Google ad revenue supporting St. Augustine hate website cyberbully MICHAEL GOLD, in violation of Google ad policies?

Google(R) policies plainly forbid ads being placed on pages that promote hate. Google states:

Sites with Google ads may not include or link to:

Pornography, adult or mature content
• Violent content
• Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any individual, group or organisation
• Excessive profanity
• Hacking/cracking content
• Gambling or casino-related content
• Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content
• Sales of beer or hard alcohol
• Sales of tobacco or tobacco-related products
• Sales of prescription drugs
• Sales of weapons or ammunition (e.g. firearms, firearm components, fighting knives, stun guns)
• Sales of products that are replicas or imitations of designer or other goods
• Sales or distribution of coursework or student essays
• Content regarding programs which compensate users for clicking ads or offers, performing searches, surfing websites or reading emails
• Any other content that is illegal, promotes illegal activity or infringes on the legal rights of others

Is Google monitoring MICHAEL GOLD, who previously urged his Plazabum hate website viewers to click on ads to put money in his pocket? Is Google supporting hate? Do Google stockholders and directors know about it yet?