FRIDAY, JUN 9, 2017, 11:03 AM
Behind the Big AT&T Strike: Years of Shipping Jobs Overseas
BY BRUCE VAIL
The outsourcing is hitting vulnerable communities in the United States hard. (Photo by David McNew/Getty Images)
A recent three-day strike against telecommunications operator AT&T attracted nationwide attention, even though the modern incarnation of the company is a far cry from the gigantic “Ma Bell” monopoly of old. The strike took nearly 40,000 workers off the job. The Communications Workers of America (CWA) union was sending a message to management: Stop stalling, start negotiating.
The immediate cause of the strike was the slowness of the company to reach new contracts with the union for improved wages and benefits for some workers, including those in AT&T’s wireless communications network. But underlying the dispute is a long-term strategy by the company to degrade the quality of its U.S. jobs as it shifts much of its business to lower-paid workers overseas, the union says.
In a recent report, CWA details some of the facts. Since 2011, the company has closed about 30 U.S. call centers while reducing the number of jobs at dozens of others, the union says. These actions resulted in the elimination of about 12,000 U.S. jobs, with much of the work transferred to call centers in low-cost countries like India and the Philippines.
According to the report:
“AT&T employs global contractors to run a large portion of its customer service operations. And AT&T is not simply turning to vendors when its in-house call centers are overloaded. The company has established a permanent global network made up of thousands of low-wage workers around the world who handle a significant share of AT&T’s customer service, sales, tech support, and other services.
The so-called “business process outsourcing” (BPO) industry is a large and growing global sector that competes intensely to offer corporate clients and lowest prices and most technologically and culturally adept services. Some vendor companies depend on AT&T for a substantial part of their business, and AT&T has come to depend on these companies to provide access to a flexible labor supply across many countries.”
In addition to India and the Philippines, other major destinations for these outsourced AT&T jobs are the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, El Salvador and Colombia, the union reports. Outsourcing contactors include the large international companies Teleperformance, Convergys and Sutherland, among others.
Another recent study, this one reported by the Hindustan Times, estimated the global size of the BPO industry at $186 billion, with India representing about 36 percent of the market. The newspaper also reported that the Philippines and other Asian countries are challenging India’s dominance.
“(I)t will be a challenge for India to maintain its leadership position as major countries like US (and) UK continue to look for low-cost options towards south-east Asian countries to remain competitive in the global market,” according to the Hindustan Times article.
The CWA reports that the Philippines has the largest number of AT&T-contracted call centers of any country outside of the Unites States. There are at least 16 such centers, across contracted eight companies, the union says.
According to the report, surveyed workers at AT&T vendors in the Philippines earn the equivalent of $1.60 to $2.05 per hour for a 40-hour week. Besides low pay, they also have very little say in their working conditions, and reportedly face retaliation when they join together to push for change.
Labor crackdowns have also been endemic in the Dominican Republic. Here’s more from the CWA report:
“Workers at Teleperformance formed a union in June of 2016. From the beginning, they have faced an intense anti-union campaign from management, including ongoing attempts to deregister the union through the courts, firing of union leaders, threats of black listing, a prohibition on employees making pro-union comments, false accusations of fraud against workers involved in the union, and other forms of intimidation. Union leaders have faced intense harassment from management and some have been forced to quit.”
The outsourcing is hitting vulnerable communities in the United States hard. Ridgeland, Mississippi, a working-class suburb of Jackson, lost 110 jobs when AT&T closed a call center in December of last year (the center provided nearly 500 jobs back in 2004). Rural Atwater, California, lost 400 jobs when AT&T closed a center there in 2014. And in Pittsburg, the company closed a call center employing 225 workers in 2013. (Twelve people transferred to other AT&T positions.) Back in the 1990s, the Pittsburg center had employed more than 1,000 workers.
Union spokeswoman Candice Johnson tells In These Times that the union has seen some progress on contract negotiations since the strike. A tentative agreement covering about 17,000 workers in California and Nevada has been reached and a contact ratification vote is being scheduled. Talks covering a larger group of 21,000 union members in other parts of the country are ongoing, but no settlement appears imminent.
Whatever the results of the stalled contracts, the union wants an end to the outsourcing (although that is not an explicit contract demand this year), Johnson says. Outside observers are predicting a long struggle ahead, with the possibility of further strikes in the future.
"The strike really united the workers (at AT&T),” Johnson said. “We are in the fight.”
Full disclosure: In These Times staff are members of the Communication Workers of America, and the union is a sponsor of the magazine. Sponsors play no role in editorial content.
Like what you’ve read? Subscribe to In These Times magazine, or make a tax-deductible donation to fund this reporting.
BRUCE VAIL
Bruce Vail is a Baltimore-based freelance writer with decades of experience covering labor and business stories for newspapers, magazines and new media. He was a reporter for Bloomberg BNA's Daily Labor Report, covering collective bargaining issues in a wide range of industries, and a maritime industry reporter and editor for the Journal of Commerce, serving both in the newspaper's New York City headquarters and in the Washington, D.C. bureau.
No comments:
Post a Comment