Circuit Court Could Reject Lenient Plea Agreement With Sheriff's Embezzler CFO RAYE BRUTNELL

As United States District Judge John J. Sirica wrote in his memoirs about an honor he was given by the City University of New York after his zealous questions exposed the Watergate break-in and coverup:

'Two quotations were included in my citation. The first is from Edmund Burke, who said, “It is the duty of the Judge to receive every offer of evidence, apparently material, suggested to him, though the parties themselves through negligence, ignorance, or corrupt colllusion, should not bring it forward. A judge is not placed in that high situation merely as a passive instrument of parties. He has a duty of his own, independent of them, and that duty is to investigate the truth.” The second is Thomas Aquinas’ definition of Justice as “a certain rectitude of mind, whereby a [person] does what he ought to do in the circumstances confronting him.”  

United States District Judge John J. Sirica, To Set the Record Straight – The Break-in, The Tapes, The Conspirators, the Pardon (1979) at 83 (Emphasis added).

I hope that the Circuit Judge will closely question learned counsel about their stinky plea deal. 

Is BRUTNELL required to give testimony about others in the Sheriff's office?

What are the findings of the forensic audit?

Who chose the auditors?

How did  BRUTNELL get away with embezzlement under Sheriff SHOAR's nose for five years?

Ask questions. Demand answers.  Expect democracy.  Strive ceaselessly for justice.