Orange County sets rules for statewide Live Local Act. Some worry they’re too restrictive. (Orlando Sentinel)

Rather than write rules, like Orange County, St. Johns County Commission Chairman CHRISTIAN WHITEHURST has at least twice asked if developers would waive their rights under the Live Local Act. 

This makes me uncomfortable.  Bottom line: Sounds like SJC BoCC Chair CHRISTIAN WHITEHURST's questions about Live Local Act may violate Fair Housing Act and Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. 

Why would he do this?  

This is the same unqualified, willful County Commissioner who on January 17, 2023, blocked adoption of a Public Housing Authority on a 3-2 vote by saying he didn't want "the kind of people" who receive HUD Section 8 Housing Vouchers living in his County.  

On January 23, 2023, I filed a Title VI and Fair Housing Act complaint with HUD on this refusal.  

On August 17, 2023, St. Johns County refused HUD's offer to conciliate between the parties.  

This is bad faith.  

It was a local law firm purporting to represent St. Johns County that refused, rather than the actual County Attorney, or actual County Commission! 

I have requested records on this firm's authority and hiring.

As Thomas Jefferson said, "I have sworn upon the Altar of Almighty God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of [humankind].

From Orlando Sentinel:

Orange County sets rules for statewide Live Local Act. Some worry they’re too restrictive.

Orlando-based Parramore Development Group is proposing to use the Live Local Act to build 140 affordable units in a 7-story tower on commercial-zoned land along Orange Blossom Trail just outside of Orlando’s SoDo neighborhood. But on this property, county code only allows multifamily townhomes or quadplexes. (Handout courtesy of Parramore Development)

By DUSTIN WYATT | dwyatt@growthspotter.com | GrowthSpotter

PUBLISHED: August 19, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. | UPDATED: August 19, 2023 at 9:28 a.m.




As four developers are looking to use Florida’s new Live Local Act to deliver lower-cost apartments to the Orlando area, Orange County established its playbook on how projects like these should be handled and where they’re allowed to go.

Some worry the policy, adopted by the commission on Aug. 8, is too restrictive and could actually derail good affordable housing projects. Developers looking to use Live Local to build on commercial property within 100 feet of a single-family home would be limited to constructing only townhomes or quadplexes, per the county’s rules.

“That’s just a shame,” said Carolyn Haslam, a local land-use attorney with the Ackerman law firm, according to a report in Growthspotter.

County officials say the provision reflects what’s already in the county code regarding multifamily development projects.




“The state legislation only pre-empted local government policies and codes with respect to density and height in certain zoning districts,” said Deputy County Manager Jon Weiss, “It was clear that the proposed multi-family development must meet all other multi-family standards and regulations. Those include setbacks, buffers, etc, which were intended to address potential compatibility issues.”

The Live Local Act, which was signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis in March and took effect on July 1, requires counties and cities to approve a multifamily development project in an area already zoned for commercial, industrial, or mixed-use if at least 40% of the units are affordable for households making up to 120% of the Area Median Income.

In addition to speeding up the approval process, the new rule is intended to give developers more flexibility with density and make them eligible for tax incentives.

Orange County officials say the law doesn’t give clear direction to local government jurisdictions about how it should be implemented, leaving it open to interpretation.

“Like everyone else, Orange County has had a very short timeframe to modify its processes and standards to comply with the new mandates,” Alan Marshall, an assistant director of the county’s planning, environmental, and development services department told the commission at the Aug. 8 meeting. “Aspects of the Live Local Act are unclear and in need of a board decision. …A resolution is needed to ensure clear direction to our staff and to the development community by adopting a process and identifying standards.”

According to the county’s policy, Live Local projects would be prohibited on land with a planned development designation. Planned developments make up the majority of the land across unincorporated Orange County, covering approximately 92,308 acres, according to county data. These are where most multifamily projects are built.

For the Live Local Act, “the legislature did not describe PDs. They did not say that PDs were an eligible zoning district,” Marshall said. “Secondly, PDs are generally negotiated districts with very specific conditions and agreements, kind of like a contract.”

He noted that substantial changes to PDs, including the addition of multifamily, require a public hearing under the county’s code.

“The mechanics of putting multifamily in PDs requires public hearings, and Live Local does not allow for public hearings,” Marshall said. “The mechanics just don’t work.”

The county commission adopted a policy saying that Live Local projects can only go on land zoned for commercial, industrial, and mixed-use. That accounts for 17,688 acres.

But it was another rule that generated the most discussion during a county meeting Wednesday when two developers sought input on two different projects.

The policy says that Live Local projects planned for property within 100 feet of a single-family home would be required to follow R-2 zoning standards, meaning only smaller-density products with up to four units per building could be built.

Haslam told county staff that a “very large percentage” of C-1 properties where affordable housing could go under the Live Local Act are near single-family homes.

“It essentially throws almost every project that qualifies for Live Local into the townhome standards,” she said. “For a parcel like this, you can’t even qualify for the tax exemptions if you do a townhome project. So it essentially makes the Live Local Act unworkable for the vast majority of those commercial sites.”

Deputy County Manager Weiss told GrowthSpotter that there are plenty of vacant commercial and industrial sites that would be eligible for higher-density projects under the Live Local Act.

Meanwhile, county commissioners say that state legislators need to tweak the Live Local Act.

“I believe the Live Local Act has promise,” said County Mayor Jerry Demings, “but the legislature does need to clarify the ambiguity in the law.”

For now, Orange County attorneys say they are taking a safe approach with their interpretation of the law.

“There are obviously some points of this law that are unclear,” Assistant County Attorney Whitney Evers told commissioners. “ So what you’re seeing…staff is erring on the side of caution. Because we aren’t sure where this is going to go.”

With the new policy in place, Lee Steinhauer, the general counsel of the Apartment Association of Greater Orlando, said he’d like to see the county give some leeway to developers attempting to build good Live Local projects.

“The question everyone is going to have is: How strictly is this (policy) going to be interpreted?” he said. “Is it going to go to the letter of the policy or is there going to be some level of flexibility in terms of allowing good projects that provide some of the affordable housing that we need?”

Osceola County received its first Live Local Act application this week when Texas-based SHIR Capital submitted preliminary plans to convert all 444 hotel rooms at Holiday Inn at Celebration into studio apartments. The Live Local Act hasn’t been tested yet on a hotel conversion.

To read more about early-stage development in Central Florida, go to GrowthSpotter.com and subscribe.



Dustin Wyatt | Journalist

Dustin Wyatt is a reporter for Growthspotter.

dwyatt@growthspotter.com