Two weeks ago three speakers rejected the idea of mayor election by fellow commissioners.
Judith Fox Fliesser said, "Having the mayor elected by the commissioners rather than directly by the people would be a way of limiting public participation. I understand there has been friction in recent years between the mayor and commissioners but I think friction is part of what democracy is."
Ed Slavin noted, "The charter was amended to provide for direct election of the mayor. Those are vested rights. Are you going to take away our right to vote for mayor because you didn't like (a) Mayor?"
And B.J. Kalaidi suggested, "It is not in the best interests of the public health, welfare and safety to have four politicians decide who will be mayor."
The idea was originally aired by first term Commissioner John Valdes, who said separate election of mayor, "makes it appear we have a strong mayor (form of government)."
A second election process amendment, requiring a year's residency to qualify to run for City Commission, was advanced to ordinance form for commission action Monday.
Any amendments to the election process would go to public referendum.
No comments:
Post a Comment