Saturday, December 13, 2025

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: Judge Emil Bove Faces Ethics Complaint for Attending Trump Rally (Mattathias Schwartz, NY Times, December 10, 2025)

In his December 10, 2025 complaint "Fix the Court" Executive Director Gabe With wrote the Third Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge:  https://fixthecourt.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/Bove-complaint-GR-12.10.25ff.pdf

Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares

Third Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

James A. Byrne United States Courthouse

601 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19106

December 10, 2025

Dear Chief Judge Chagares:

My name is Gabe Roth, and I am executive director of Fix the Court, a national nonpartisan organization that

advocates for greater openness and accountability in the federal courts.

Today I file this complaint, under the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act, 28 U.S.C. §§351ff, against Third Circuit

Judge Emil Bove for his attendance at a President Trump rally in Mount Pocono, Pa., on Dec. 9.

When asked about his attendance by a reporter, Judge Bove said he was “just here as a citizen coming to watch

the President speak.” 1 There is no prohibition, of course, against a federal judge attending an event at which a

President is speaking. For example, Supreme Court justices attend the State of the Union each year as a show of

unity among the branches and their shared commitment to our tripartite form of government, and judges and

justices are at times guests at White House state dinners.

But last night’s event in Pennsylvania — prominent conservative voices are calling it a “rally,” so that’s what I

will call it here2

— was a far cry from the State of the Union or a state dinner for its abject partisanship. It should

have been obvious to Judge Bove, either at the start of the rally or fairly close to it, that this was a highly charged,

highly political event that no federal judge should have been within shouting distance of.

To offer but a few examples, President Trump attacked “the radical left” about 90 seconds in. Three minutes in,

he started talking about the 2020 election, which he falsely claimed he won, and six minutes later, he encouraged

rallygoers to boo at the “fake news.” At 18:50, the President mused about running for a third term and the crowd

started chanting “four more years”; 3 at 25:28, he called President Biden a “son of a bitch”; at 28:38, he called for

the deportation of a Democratic member of Congress; and at 38:20, he called Democrats “bad people” and “sick

people.” There are no reports that Judge Bove vacated his seat after hearing any of these injudicious comments.

The Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges is fairly clear here. Canon 2 states that a judge “should avoid impropriety

and the appearance of impropriety in all activities.” Attending a Trump event — and not leaving when it became

clear that the speech was, in fact, a partisan rally — violates this canon.

Canon 5 states that a judge “should refrain from political activity.” Last night’s event in Pennsylvania was barely

distinguishable (i.e., only temporally) from a Trump rally in 2020 or 2024, both of which were obvious political

activities.

Finally, in the coming days, if it hasn’t happened already, there will be questions from reasonable and unbiased

observers as to whether Judge Bove’s attendance imperils his impartiality when assigned cases in which Trump is

1 See https://x.com/V aughnHillyard/status/1998508313642938631.

2 Seee.g., https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1998460803553653073 and https://x.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1998575939450532097.

3 The timestamps are from a Fox News posting of the rally, available this link, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZJgbCFaM84.on either side of the “v.” This question of recusal is not something I wish to address here directly, but I do want to

make the point that the mere discussion speaks to the impropriety of the judge’s attendance. (And if a judge

attended a VP Harris, Sen. Sanders or Gov. Newsom rally, for example, that would merit a complaint and a similar

recusal discussion if said judge was assigned a case involving one of those politicians.)

For all these reasons, I believe Judge Bove has violated multiple Canons of the Code of Conduct, should be

admonished for his behavior and should be subject to any other discipline under the Judicial Conduct and

Disability Act that the Chief Judge and the Judicial Council deem fit.

Sincerely,

Gabe Roth

Fix the Court

Gabe@FixTheCourt.com

Judge Emil Bove Faces Ethics Complaint for Attending Trump Rally

One of the president’s appeals-court nominees, a former lawyer for the president, was in the crowd at a raucous event in Mt. Pocono, Pa.

Listen to this article · 4:23 min Learn more
Judge Emil Bove III attended a rally for President Trump on Tuesday.Credit...Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

Judge Emil Bove III, a federal appeals court judge who made his career as a stalwart supporter of President Trump, is now facing a complaint over his attendance at a campaign-style rally held by Mr. Trump at a Pennsylvania casino resort on Tuesday.

The complaint, which was filed on Wednesday with the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and was written by Gabe Roth, who heads the advocacy group Fix the Court, said that Judge Bove’s attendance at the rally violated rules that prohibit judges from “the appearance of impropriety” and engaging in “political activity.”

Judge Bove declined to comment. At the event, he said he was “just here as a citizen coming to watch the president speak,” according to a reporter from MSNBC who spotted him there.

Judge Bove previously served on Mr. Trump’s criminal defense team and was then chosen by Mr. Trump for a high-ranking job in the Justice Department. Mr. Trump’s selection of Judge Bove to the federal bench was a departure from his first-term judicial nominees, who were mostly well-known conservative lawyers with ties to the Federalist Society, not loyalists who had personally defended the president in court. The Senate narrowly confirmed him to the bench of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in July.

In response to what is formally known as a “judicial conduct or disability complaint,” the circuit’s chief judge has the option of dismissing it or appointing a committee to investigate further. The committee can then recommend that a larger council of judges censure the judge or consider other punishments, such as deciding the judge will be assigned no new cases for a period of time.

Before becoming a judge, Mr. Bove had drawn considerable attention from critics for his hard-charging approach to implementing Mr. Trump’s agenda. During his stint at the Justice Department, he was involved in a March decision by the administration not to return two flights carrying Venezuelan immigrants to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador, despite an order from Judge James E. Boasberg. Another senior justice department official, who has since been dismissed from the government, claimed that Mr. Bove talked openly about the possibility of flouting court orders, which he denied in his Senate confirmation hearing.

Earlier in his career, as a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York, Mr. Bove helped investigate Honduran drug traffickers, which eventually led to the 2024 conviction of President Juan Orlando Hernández. After Mr. Trump pardoned Mr. Hernández earlier this month, Judge Bove told the Times that “I completely trust and respect his judgment in exercising the pardon power, which the Constitution vests in him alone by virtue of his mandate from the American people.”

Judges are sometimes among the audience for presidential speeches, such as the State of the Union. But the complaint emphasized stridently partisan statements that Mr. Trump made at the Tuesday event, held in Mount Pocono, Pa.

In a meandering 90-minute speech that was billed as focusing on economic matters, Mr. Trump falsely disputed the fact that consumer prices were rising while lashing out at undocumented immigrants and transgender Americans. He used expletives in reference to some immigrants’ countries of origin, and said his predecessor, former President Joseph R. Biden, “destroyed our country.”

On Wednesday, a White House social media account called the event an “electric rally.”

Image
Judge Bove previously served on Mr. Trump’s criminal defense team.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

“This was a highly charged, highly political event that no federal judge should have been within shouting distance of,” Mr. Roth wrote in his complaint.

Jeremy Fogel, a retired federal judge, agreed that the rally was a “political event,” and that Judge Bove’s attendance could have created “at least the appearance of partiality, particularly given what the president said.” Sitting on an appellate court, Judge Bove could be in a position to rule on some of the hundreds of lawsuits over Mr. Trump’s policies that are now making their way through the federal system.

“I can’t understand how he could possibly think it appropriate to go there,” said Edward Whelan, a former law clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia and a prominent conservative legal commentator. “You can argue about whether the rules clearly prohibit what he did, but he showed terrible judgment.”

See more on: U.S. Politics

No comments: