Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Reckon JOHN LUIGI MICA is right about banning lithium batteries on airplanes? (Heather Beaven, unsafe at any speed?)




Yes. Heather Beaven is wrong. Dead wrong.

Congressman JOHN LUIGI MICA was right in seeking to ban lithium batteries from airplanes. They are a fire hazard. They are extremely flammable. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says that "Primary lithium batteries cannot be extinguished with firefighting agents normally carried on aircraft."

We can't carry gasoline or other flamable products on board airplanes, either. No one complains.

It is a matter of air safety. When we fly, we don't want to die.

We need fireproof containers on airplanes to contain lithium batteries.

The Valu-Jet crash in South Florida killed 105 people on May 11, 1998 and was caused by exothermic reactions from chemical oxygen generators wrongfully carried on board.

Heather Beaven's demagogic E-mailing (below) is the sort of misguided partisanship that causes people to die. We need a real Democratic nominee (Faye Armitage, who earned nearly 150,000 votes in 2008).

We don't need as a Democratic nominee an unwise, uncouth Republican act-alike wannabee, someone who prattles (below) airily, as if she were a Stepford WIfe lobbyist from the National Association of Manufacturers. She says that MICS's amendment would "greatly harm large and small business communication. Clearly John Mica is not only out of touch with today's business traveler, he does not understand today's world."

Her "greatly" is as mistaken as her "clearly," adverbs in defense of the indefensible -- a troglodytic anti-safety point of view that verges on mockery and ignorance.

Heather Beaven describes herself as a "social entrepeneur." Evidently Beaven must also be a high-stakes gambler, one who is willing to gamble on air safety with human lives.

When even JOHN LUIGI MICA, a right-wing Republican is willing to stand up for air safety, he deserves praise, not vilification.

So here goes: JOHN LUIGI MICA is right on lithium batteries. Beaven is wrong.
Beaven is unscientific. She wants to make public policy based on slogans, not facts. She's willing to go demagogic, and it is not even 2010 yet. If she's willing to sacrifice air safety, what else is she willing to sacrifice? Occupational safety and health? (Yes, see below).

In fairness, JOHN LUIGI MICA was also right in the 1990s when he voted against the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which allow banks to sell stock and investments. Time has proven that JOHN MICA was correct on that vote, too.

The difference between statesmen and politicians is that statesmen can work with people of differing political persuasions for the common good. My first boss, Senator Ted Kennedy, was a statesman. Senator Orin Hatch was one of his best friends, and he would make deals with Hatch and other Republicans to pass progressive legislation.

In contrast, Heather Beaven's reflexive anti-MICA posturing shows that she is a hack, someone with little public policy experience, more mouth than mensch.

Heather Beaven says she's "CEO & President of The Florida Endowment Foundation for Florida's Graduates who oversees all aspects of a monumental, $20 million dollar, growth campaign in stay-in-school, school-to-career and return-to-school initiatives designed to positively impact the graduation rate, employability (sic) readiness and the post secondary education enrollment of students' of untapped promise."

Questions that need to be asked about Heather Beaven's "monumental, $20 million dollar, growth campaignm" a 501(c)(3):

Who funds it? (Government and big corporations).

What does it do? (Little but fancy brochures).

What's the purpose of it (further funding, feel-good for donors, and encouraging "at risk" high school students to become docile workers who show up for work on time, but are never never taught their rights under minimum wage, occupational health and safety, and other laws).

It makes sense that someone who thinks they're doing students a favor not teaching them about OSHA would want to blast JOHN MICA for a pro-safety amendment.

It makes sense that someone who has no business experience would ascribe mean and base motives to all business travelers. Who would want to risk their fellow passengers' safety for the use of a dumb 'ole laptop computer at 30,000 feet?

Heather Beaven, the Stealth corporativist candidate from the "monumental, $20 million dollar, growth campaign" that teaches workers nothing about OSHA.

Heather Beaven: unsafe at any speed?

Heather Beaven attacks Mica on his effort to ban lithium batteries on airplanes

NEW VIDEO: JOHN MICA'S ARCHAIC IDEAS ARE OUT OF STEP WITH THE MODERN WORLD

While our families await help from Congress to spur job creation in Florida, John Mica introduced legislation prohibiting lithium batteries on airplanes. This would ban cell phones, laptops and I-pods on commercial airplane flights in America. If John Mica is successful, this would greatly harm large and small business communication. Clearly John Mica is not only out of touch with today's business traveler, he does not understand today's world. In the 20th century, we could "unplug" for days but that just isn't how the world works today.

Even his fellow Republicans in Congress disagree with John Mica on his legislation. They know that Mica's legislation would further depress innovation and job creation.

Click here to watch Mica's comments on banning laptops, cell phones and lithium batteries on commercial airplanes.

George Gardner's St. Augustine report: The REAL First Thanksgiving


The REAL First Thanksgiving
"As the Thanksgiving holiday approaches, school children everywhere are dusting off their Pilgrim costumes and asking their parents for contributions of turkey, dressing, and cranberry sauce for classroom recreations of the famous Plymouth meal. REAL Thanksgiving book cover
"But Florida schoolchildren in particular should really be researching the attire of Spanish soldiers and Timucuan Indians and asking grandma to help them find garbanzo beans and chorizo sausage for their communal school meal."
So starts a treatise on the Florida Humanities Council website, setting the record straight on America's traditional holiday.
It echoes the assertion by Historian Michael Gannon that earned him the title "The Grinch Who Stole Thanksgiving" in New England circles.
"The REAL first Thanksgiving took place in St. Augustine, Florida in 1565. . . . The meal, shared by Spanish soldiers and natives of the Seloy tribe, was a celebration of the safe arrival of the Spanish expedition of Pedro Menéndez de Avilés."
Ponte Vedra's Robyn Gioia is bringing that message to young students in her book, America's REAL First Thanksgiving.

American Bar Association Endorses Free Flow of Information Act (Federal Press Shield Law)

Senate Proposal on Federal Shield Law Wins ABA Endorsement

American Bar Association Supports Specter-Schumer Substitute to S. 448, Free Flow of Information Act

The ABA is calling on the Senate Judiciary Committee to move forward with its consideration of the newly-introduced bipartisan Specter-Schumer substitute to S. 448, the Free Flow of Information Act 2009.

The substitute for the proposed federal shield law is scheduled for mark-up this week. In a letter sent to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Patrick Leahy and all committee members, the ABA noted that the compromise “is the first to be vigorously supported by both the news industry and the Department of Justice.”

“Their joint support signifies that this substitute strikes the right balance and will protect the free flow of information to the public through a free and active press without impeding legitimate criminal investigations or threatening national security,” continued the letter.

The ABA praised the substitute measure for its definition of who is covered under the shield law, its shift in the burden of proof required for not revealing a source, a broadened national security exception, and allowances for in camera or ex parte judicial review of evidence.

A full copy of the letter, signed by ABA Governmental Affairs Director Thomas Susman, will be posted at http://www.abanet.org/poladv/letters/additional/2009nov19_fedshields_l.pdf

Additional background or interviews available upon request.

With nearly 400,000 members, the American Bar Association is the largest voluntary professional membership organization in the world. As the national voice of the legal profession, the ABA works to improve the administration of justice, promotes programs that assist lawyers and judges in their work, accredits law schools, provides continuing legal education, and works to build public understanding around the world of the importance of the rule of law.

November 20, 2009

BBC News: US pledges carbon emissions cuts

President Barack Obama is to pledge to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the US in several stages, beginning with a 17% cut by 2020, the White House has said.

The offer will be made at December's UN climate talks in Copenhagen, which Mr Obama will attend.

But he does not plan to be there for the crucial last days, when delegates including other world leaders are hoping to pull together a deal.

The talks aim to draw up a new treaty to supplant the 1997 Kyoto Protocol.

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer said his attendance could be vital for a deal.

CUTS ALREADY PLEDGED
# EU - 20% cut from 1990 levels, rising to 30% in the event of a global agreement
# Australia - 25% from 2000 levels
# Japan - 25% from 1990 levels

"It's critical that President Obama attends the climate change summit in Copenhagen," he told journalists.

The cuts Mr Obama has proposed are similar to those included in a bill passed by the US House of Representatives in June.

But with legislation currently stuck in the Senate, correspondents say the president will be unable to commit to any of the figures he is proposing at the summit.

So far more than 60 world leaders have said they will attend.

Observers say the presence of such figures as Mr Obama will raise hopes for action on climate change, although the talks are not expected to result in a new treaty.

'Momentum for talks'

Officials said the US would pledge a 17% cut in emissions from 2005 levels by 2020, 30% by 2025, 42% by 2030 and 83% by 2050.
COPENHAGEN SUMMIT
# Planning to attend: Leaders of United States, Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Australia, Japan, Indonesia and Brazil Yet to commit:
# Leaders of China and India

Mr Obama will outline a "pathway" towards the US goals at the summit, a White House statement said.

It described the cuts as "a significant contribution to a problem that the US has neglected for too long".

But most other countries' targets are given in comparison with 1990 figures.

BBC environment correspondent Richard Black says that on that basis the US figure amounts to just a few percentage points, as its emissions have risen by about 15% since 1990.

This is much less than the EU's pledge of a 20% cut over the same period, or a 30% cut if there is a global deal; and much less than the 25-40% figure that developing countries are demanding.

The US president will be in the Danish capital on 9 December, a day before receiving his Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo.

But he does not plan to return for the key last stages of the summit, which runs from 7-18 December.

White House aide Mike Froman said the decision to go to Copenhagen was "to give momentum to the negotiations there".

The decision follows intense speculation about whether the US president would go at all.

Delegations from 192 countries will be attending the summit. HAVE YOUR SAY I'm sure the event in Copenhagen will be beneficial for Planet Earth Juan Leonidas Vega G, San Salvador

Leaders saying they will attend include UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Brazilian President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva.

Hu Jintao, president of the world's largest polluter, China, is yet to commit to attending.

The US is the second largest polluter after China.

Mr Obama has made climate change a major priority for his administration, after previous incumbents had failed to ratify the Kyoto treaty.

But a bill to cap US emissions and establish a national carbon trading scheme is currently stuck in the Senate and is not expected to pass before the end of the year.

Correspondents say most nations have given up hope of a legally binding treaty because of uncertainty about the US position.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/8378890.stm

Published: 2009/11/25 17:38:54 GMT

© BBC MMIX

Letter to Florida Department of Environmental Protection regarding suitable projects for City of St. Augustine re: 611,294 gallons of sewage pollution

Good afternoon:
1. Some 611,294 gallons of sewage pollution were unlawfully deposited in the San Sebastian River (which is immediately adjacent to our office, with sewage having been detected off our deck by FDEP and COSA).

2. Regarding suitably ambitious projects for our City of St. Augustine to atone for the 611,294 gallons of sewage deposited in San Sebastian River,please see the Oak Ridger article:
http://www.oakridger.com/news/x1682934206/Draft-plan-aims-for-greener-city

3. A suitable project would be for the City of St. Augustine to:
A. Appoint a Director of Environment, Safety, Health and Archaeology (ESHA);
B. Adopt an ordinance protect environmental whistleblowers (as the
Anastasia Mosquito Control Commission of St. Johns County does);
C. Place all environmental, safety, health and archaeological
protection information online, including all MSDS. Data about
water and sewer systems and pollution.

4. As part of this project, The City of St. Augustine should endorse the proposed St. Augustine National Historical Park, Seashore and Scenic Coastal Parkway Act, www.staugustgreen.com, and work to adopt an "emerald necklace of parks."

5. The City of Atlanta created $40 million in xx did for a Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) due to its sewage pollution when John Henry Hankinson, Jr. was EPA Regional Administrator.

6. Will FDEP now kindly take steps for the City Manager to be investigated by the Statewide Grand Jury regarding all of the pollution for which he is responsible (which is a dogged pattern not remedied by DEP's paltry fines to date)?

7. Is that too much to ask? What do you reckon? Please see article below.

Sincerely,
Ed Slavin

The Oak RIdger: Draft plan aims for 'greener' city

By John Huotari | john.huotari@oakridger.com
The Oak Ridger
Posted Nov 23, 2009 @ 09:00 AM
CLINTON, Tenn. —

A climate action plan aimed at reducing local greenhouse gas emissions and making Oak Ridge a "sustainable" community will be discussed at an Oak Ridge City Council work session tonight.

The climate action plan's "draft," developed during many meetings and hours of work by the Oak Ridge Environmental Quality Advisory Board, calls for work in five areas that range from reducing energy consumption and conserving natural resources to enhancing the business community and educating the public.

Goals include promoting the production and use of local food, developing a transportation master plan, reducing waste, improving air and water quality, and encouraging new businesses that produce "green" products or services.

Possible actions include a comprehensive energy audit of city facilities and services and establishment of minimum building code compliance standards for re-selling homes, part of an effort to revitalize existing residential and commercial properties.

EQAB is recommending the formation of a public-private partnership -- the Oak Ridge Energy and Climate Collaborative -- to oversee and guide early implementation of the plan.

EQAB has recommended emissions reduction targets of 10 percent by 2015, 50 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050. Those goals, based on a 2004 baseline, are meant to help stabilize atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide, a so-called greenhouse gas, at or below levels that would avoid the most severe and catastrophic potential impacts of climate change.

An emissions study has found that most of the city government's equivalent carbon dioxide emissions -- or 52 percent of them -- come from water and sewer operations. Transporting water through the city's mountainous terrain uses a lot of energy, the draft report says.

In the community, commercial and industrial operations account for 45 percent of the emissions, the report says.

Besides reducing emissions, the climate action plan is meant to provide long-term community and economic benefits to Oak Ridge citizens.

"Future economic growth in Oak Ridge will depend on how quickly we transition to a new way of living that is based on a far more diversified energy mix, more efficient use of energy and development of our communities in ways that strengthen neighborhoods and urban centers, preserve natural areas and enhance the quality of life in Oak Ridge," the report says.

The 62-page draft plan says initial implementation of priority action items is not expected to be costly, and the return on investment should be realized quickly.

Meanwhile, delaying action on reducing greenhouse gas emissions could add to potential costs, reducing economic benefits and "making it more difficult to reach long-term goals."

"If we fail to take action, the consequences to human populations are potentially severe," the report says. "If we are wrong about the causes, but we take the actions that have been recommended, man and the environment will certainly be no worse off and arguably better off than under a business-as-usual scenario."

In the summer of 2008, city officials asked EQAB to develop a baseline inventory of greenhouse gas emissions, recommend emissions reduction targets, develop a "local action plan," and offer recommendations that could help make the city more environmentally friendly.

The draft climate action plan says the "most significant reductions in emissions will come from increasing energy efficiency in all sectors of our community, continuing to increase sources and use of renewable energy, and designing our communities to reduce our reliance on automobiles for transportation."

The plan includes 25 strategies, along with 74 tactics for possible implementation.

Development of the plan included a well-attended public forum in January that generated more than 400 ideas.

Today's work session begins at 6:30 p.m. in the Multipurpose Room at the Central Services Complex.

John Huotari can be contacted at (865) 220-5533.

Monday, November 23, 2009

NY TImes: November 23, 2009 As Sewers Fill, Waste Poisons Waterways

November 23, 2009
As Sewers Fill, Waste Poisons Waterways
By CHARLES DUHIGG

It was drizzling lightly in late October when the midnight shift started at the Owls Head Water Pollution Control Plant, where much of Brooklyn’s sewage is treated.

A few miles away, people were walking home without umbrellas from late dinners. But at Owls Head, a swimming pool’s worth of sewage and wastewater was soon rushing in every second. Warning horns began to blare. A little after 1 a.m., with a harder rain falling, Owls Head reached its capacity and workers started shutting the intake gates.

That caused a rising tide throughout Brooklyn’s sewers, and untreated feces and industrial waste started spilling from emergency relief valves into the Upper New York Bay and Gowanus Canal.

“It happens anytime you get a hard rainfall,” said Bob Connaughton, one the plant’s engineers. “Sometimes all it takes is 20 minutes of rain, and you’ve got overflows across Brooklyn.”

One goal of the Clean Water Act of 1972 was to upgrade the nation’s sewer systems, many of them built more than a century ago, to handle growing populations and increasing runoff of rainwater and waste. During the 1970s and 1980s, Congress distributed more than $60 billion to cities to make sure that what goes into toilets, industrial drains and street grates would not endanger human health.

But despite those upgrades, many sewer systems are still frequently overwhelmed, according to a New York Times analysis of environmental data. As a result, sewage is spilling into waterways.

In the last three years alone, more than 9,400 of the nation’s 25,000 sewage systems — including those in major cities — have reported violating the law by dumping untreated or partly treated human waste, chemicals and other hazardous materials into rivers and lakes and elsewhere, according to data from state environmental agencies and the Environmental Protection Agency.

But fewer than one in five sewage systems that broke the law were ever fined or otherwise sanctioned by state or federal regulators, the Times analysis shows.

It is not clear whether the sewage systems that have not reported such dumping are doing any better, because data on overflows and spillage are often incomplete.

As cities have grown rapidly across the nation, many have neglected infrastructure projects and paved over green spaces that once absorbed rainwater. That has contributed to sewage backups into more than 400,000 basements and spills into thousands of streets, according to data collected by state and federal officials. Sometimes, waste has overflowed just upstream from drinking water intake points or near public beaches.

There is no national record-keeping of how many illnesses are caused by sewage spills. But academic research suggests that as many as 20 million people each year become ill from drinking water containing bacteria and other pathogens that are often spread by untreated waste.

A 2007 study published in the journal Pediatrics, focusing on one Milwaukee hospital, indicated that the number of children suffering from serious diarrhea rose whenever local sewers overflowed. Another study, published in 2008 in the Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health, estimated that as many as four million people become sick each year in California from swimming in waters containing the kind of pollution often linked to untreated sewage.

Around New York City, samples collected at dozens of beaches or piers have detected the types of bacteria and other pollutants tied to sewage overflows. Though the city’s drinking water comes from upstate reservoirs, environmentalists say untreated excrement and other waste in the city’s waterways pose serious health risks.

A Deluge of Sewage

“After the storm, the sewage flowed down the street faster than we could move out of the way and filled my house with over a foot of muck,” said Laura Serrano, whose Bay Shore, N.Y., home was damaged in 2005 by a sewer overflow.

Ms. Serrano, who says she contracted viral meningitis because of exposure to the sewage, has filed suit against Suffolk County, which operates the sewer system. The county’s lawyer disputes responsibility for the damage and injuries.

“I had to move out, and no one will buy my house because the sewage was absorbed into the walls,” Ms. Serrano said. “I can still smell it sometimes.”

When a sewage system overflows or a treatment plant dumps untreated waste, it is often breaking the law. Today, sewage systems are the nation’s most frequent violators of the Clean Water Act. More than a third of all sewer systems — including those in San Diego, Houston, Phoenix, San Antonio, Philadelphia, San Jose and San Francisco — have violated environmental laws since 2006, according to a Times analysis of E.P.A. data.

Thousands of other sewage systems operated by smaller cities, colleges, mobile home parks and companies have also broken the law. But few of the violators are ever punished.

The E.P.A., in a statement, said that officials agreed that overflows posed a “significant environmental and human health problem, and significantly reducing or eliminating such overflows has been a priority for E.P.A. enforcement since the mid-1990s.”

In the last year, E.P.A. settlements with sewer systems in Hampton Roads, Va., and the east San Francisco Bay have led to more than $200 million spent on new systems to reduce pollution, the agency said. In October, the E.P.A. administrator, Lisa P. Jackson, said she was overhauling how the Clean Water Act is enforced.

But widespread problems still remain.

“The E.P.A. would rather look the other way than crack down on cities, since punishing municipalities can cause political problems,” said Craig Michaels of Riverkeeper, an environmental advocacy group. “But without enforcement and fines, this problem will never end.”

Plant operators and regulators, for their part, say that fines would simply divert money from stretched budgets and that they are doing the best they can with aging systems and overwhelmed pipes.

New York, for example, was one of the first major cities to build a large sewer system, starting construction in 1849. Many of those pipes — constructed of hand-laid brick and ceramic tiles — are still used. Today, the city’s 7,400 miles of sewer pipes operate almost entirely by gravity, unlike in other cities that use large pumps.

New York City’s 14 wastewater treatment plants, which handle 1.3 billion gallons of wastewater a day, have been flooded with thousands of pickles (after a factory dumped its stock), vast flows of discarded chicken heads and large pieces of lumber.

When a toilet flushes in the West Village in Manhattan, the waste runs north six miles through gradually descending pipes to a plant at 137th Street, where it is mixed with so-called biological digesters that consume dangerous pathogens. The wastewater is then mixed with chlorine and sent into the Hudson River.

Fragile System

But New York’s system — like those in hundreds of others cities — combines rainwater runoff with sewage. Over the last three decades, as thousands of acres of trees, bushes and other vegetation in New York have been paved over, the land’s ability to absorb rain has declined significantly. When treatment plants are swamped, the excess spills from 490 overflow pipes throughout the city’s five boroughs.

When the sky is clear, Owls Head can handle the sewage from more than 750,000 people. But the balance is so delicate that Mr. Connaughton and his colleagues must be constantly ready for rain.

They choose cable television packages for their homes based on which company offers the best local weather forecasts. They know meteorologists by the sound of their voices. When the leaves begin to fall each autumn, clogging sewer grates and pipes, Mr. Connaughton sometimes has trouble sleeping.

“I went to Hawaii with my wife, and the whole time I was flipping to the Weather Channel, seeing if it was raining in New York,” he said.

New York’s sewage system overflows essentially every other time it rains.

Reducing such overflows is a priority, city officials say. But eradicating the problem would cost billions.

Officials have spent approximately $35 billion over three decades improving the quality of the waters surrounding the city and have improved systems to capture and store rainwater and sewage, bringing down the frequency and volume of overflows, the city’s Department of Environmental Protection wrote in a statement.

“Water quality in New York City has improved dramatically in the last century, and particularly in the last two decades,” officials wrote.

Several years ago, city officials estimated that it would cost at least $58 billion to prevent all overflows. “Even an expenditure of that magnitude would not result in every part of a river or bay surrounding the city achieving water quality that is suitable for swimming,” the department wrote. “It would, however, increase the average N.Y.C. water and sewer bill by 80 percent.”

The E.P.A., concerned about the risks of overflowing sewers, issued a national framework in 1994 to control overflows, including making sure that pipes are designed so they do not easily become plugged by debris and warning the public when overflows occur. In 2000, Congress amended the Clean Water Act to crack down on overflows.

But in hundreds of places, sewer systems remain out of compliance with that framework or the Clean Water Act, which regulates most pollution discharges to waterways. And the burdens on sewer systems are growing as cities become larger and, in some areas, rainstorms become more frequent and fierce.

New York’s system, for instance, was designed to accommodate a so-called five-year storm — a rainfall so extreme that it is expected to occur, on average, only twice a decade. But in 2007 alone, the city experienced three 25-year storms, according to city officials — storms so strong they would be expected only four times each century.

“When you get five inches of rain in 30 minutes, it’s like Thanksgiving Day traffic on a two-lane bridge in the sewer pipes,” said James Roberts, deputy commissioner of the city’s Department of Environmental Protection.

Government’s Response

To combat these shifts, some cities are encouraging sewer-friendly development. New York, for instance, has instituted zoning laws requiring new parking lots to include landscaped areas to absorb rainwater, established a tax credit for roofs with absorbent vegetation and begun to use millions of dollars for environmentally friendly infrastructure projects.

Philadelphia has announced it will spend $1.6 billion over 20 years to build rain gardens and sidewalks of porous pavement and to plant thousands of trees.

But unless cities require private developers to build in ways that minimize runoff, the volume of rain flowing into sewers is likely to grow, environmentalists say.

The only real solution, say many lawmakers and water advocates, is extensive new spending on sewer systems largely ignored for decades. As much as $400 billion in extra spending is needed over the next decade to fix the nation’s sewer infrastructure, according to estimates by the E.P.A. and the Government Accountability Office.

Legislation under consideration on Capitol Hill contains millions in water infrastructure grants, and the stimulus bill passed this year set aside $6 billion to improve sewers and other water systems.

But that money is only a small fraction of what is needed, officials say. And over the last two decades, federal money for such programs has fallen by 70 percent, according to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, which estimates that a quarter of the state’s sewage and wastewater treatment plants are “using outmoded, inadequate technology.”

“The public has no clue how important these sewage plants are,” said Mr. Connaughton of the Brooklyn site. “Waterborne disease was the scourge of mankind for centuries. These plants stopped that. We’re doing everything we can to clean as much sewage as possible, but sometimes, that isn’t enough.”