Monday, September 17, 2018

City Attorney sues blogger for libel (Miami Herald)

What flummery, dupery, nincompoopery and chutzpa!

Some thin-skinned Florida public officials never have a happy day. This one just filed an unconstitutional civil lawsuit the violates the First Amendment and seeks to inflict a chilling effect upon First Amendment protected activity by a South Florida blogger in North Bay Village.

IMHO: This is an illegal Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation, violates Florida law and the First Amendment and will likely be dismissed, with the offending strip club lobbyist and City Attorney likely being ordered to pay the defendant and counter plaintiff's attorney fees. Don't take my word for it -- read the statute:


Florida Statute 768.295 Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) prohibited.—
(1) It is the intent of the Legislature to protect the right in Florida to exercise the rights of free speech in connection with public issues, and the rights to peacefully assemble, instruct representatives, and petition for redress of grievances before the various governmental entities of this state as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and s. 5, Art. I of the State Constitution. It is the public policy of this state that a person or governmental entity not engage in SLAPP suits because such actions are inconsistent with the right of persons to exercise such constitutional rights of free speech in connection with public issues. Therefore, the Legislature finds and declares that prohibiting such lawsuits as herein described will preserve this fundamental state policy, preserve the constitutional rights of persons in Florida, and assure the continuation of representative government in this state. It is the intent of the Legislature that such lawsuits be expeditiously disposed of by the courts.
(2) As used in this section, the phrase or term:
(a) “Free speech in connection with public issues” means any written or oral statement that is protected under applicable law and is made before a governmental entity in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a governmental entity, or is made in or in connection with a play, movie, television program, radio broadcast, audiovisual work, book, magazine article, musical work, news report, or other similar work.
(b) “Governmental entity” or “government entity” means the state, including the executive, legislative, and the judicial branches of government and the independent establishments of the state, counties, municipalities, corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities of the state, counties, or municipalities, districts, authorities, boards, commissions, or any agencies thereof.
(3) A person or governmental entity in this state may not file or cause to be filed, through its employees or agents, any lawsuit, cause of action, claim, cross-claim, or counterclaim against another person or entity without merit and primarily because such person or entity has exercised the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue, or right to peacefully assemble, to instruct representatives of government, or to petition for redress of grievances before the various governmental entities of this state, as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and s. 5, Art. I of the State Constitution.
(4) A person or entity sued by a governmental entity or another person in violation of this section has a right to an expeditious resolution of a claim that the suit is in violation of this section. A person or entity may move the court for an order dismissing the action or granting final judgment in favor of that person or entity. The person or entity may file a motion for summary judgment, together with supplemental affidavits, seeking a determination that the claimant’s or governmental entity’s lawsuit has been brought in violation of this section. The claimant or governmental entity shall thereafter file a response and any supplemental affidavits. As soon as practicable, the court shall set a hearing on the motion, which shall be held at the earliest possible time after the filing of the claimant’s or governmental entity’s response. The court may award, subject to the limitations in s. 768.28, the party sued by a governmental entity actual damages arising from a governmental entity’s violation of this section. The court shall award the prevailing party reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in connection with a claim that an action was filed in violation of this section.
(5) In any case filed by a governmental entity which is found by a court to be in violation of this section, the governmental entity shall report such finding and provide a copy of the court’s order to the Attorney General no later than 30 days after such order is final. The Attorney General shall report any violation of this section by a governmental entity to the Cabinet, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. A copy of such report shall be provided to the affected governmental entity.
History.—s. 1, ch. 2000-174; s. 1, ch. 2015-70.


From the Miami Herald:





North Bay Village attorney Norman Powell (left) and local blogger Kevin Vericker (right)

City attorney sues blogger for libel. Is it ‘a threat designed to silence?’

September 17, 2018 06:30 AM
Updated 8 minutes ago 

1 comment:

Warren Celli said...

The scam 'rule of law' SLAPP statutes mean nothing.

What counts is corrupt money gained on a tilted playing field used to strangle, choke, and murder, any opposing viewpoints.

Melania Trump, who prostituted herself to gain 'brand' value, 'won' her suit against Wester Griffin Tarpley and like the bully that she is made him apologize on bended knee.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/melania-trump-libel-suit-settled-another-filed/

A high profile precedent setting immoral chill of the publics voice!!!!!

Murderous scum bag pretenders all.