Media Alerts on Federal Courts of Appeals
Case Name: U.S. v. Seale
Headline: Fifth Circuit Upholds Kidnapping Conviction of Alleged KKK Member
Area of Law: Criminal
Issue(s) Presented: (1) Whether the Government's forty-year delay in bringing an indictment was done in bad faith. (2) Whether the defendant's statement to the FBI should be suppressed for failure to provide a Miranda warning. (3) Whether the evidence was relevant and sufficient to support conviction.
Brief Summary: James Ford Seale was convicted of a 1964 kidnapping associated with his alleged membership in the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). A prior Fifth Circuit panel reversed his conviction as time barred, but the en banc court reinstated the conviction. Hearing the remaining issues of Seale's appeal, the Fifth Circuit rejected all of his challenges to the lower court proceedings and affirmed his conviction.
Extended Summary (if applicable): The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld James Ford Seale’s kidnapping conviction by a 2-1 vote. Seale, allegedly a member of the KKK, was charged with conspiring with fellow KKK members to kidnap and murder two African-American men in 1964. Believing the victims to be Black Panthers who were stockpiling guns and planning an insurrection, Seale and his co-conspirators allegedly beat the victims and then dumped their bodies into the Mississippi River. The Government lacked the evidence necessary to prove the elements of the crime until 2007, when Charles Edwards, one of the alleged coconspirators, provided enough information for the Government to obtain an indictment against Seale. Seale was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment by a jury in 2007. In 2008, a Fifth Circuit panel unanimously reversed his conviction, concluding that Seale’s prosecution was time barred. However, the full Fifth Circuit disagreed with the panel decision, reinstating Seale’s conviction by an equally divided 8-8 vote. The Supreme Court declined to hear the case, and the Fifth Circuit was asked to decide the remaining issues of Seale’s appeal. Although the court had already rejected the argument that Seale’s conviction was time barred, he raised the argument that the indictment was brought after unfair delay. He claimed that the Government intentionally delayed the indictment in bad faith in order to seek some tactical advantage. The court rejected this argument, noting that the primary reason for the delay was a lack of evidence. A prosecutor has a duty not to bring an indictment until he has sufficient evidence to prove each element of the underlying crime. In this case, the Government did not have enough evidence until Edwards came forward. Although the Government did not bring charges for more than forty years after the crime, there was a reasonable basis to justify the long delay. Seale also argued that statements he made to the FBI when he was first arrested in 1964 should not have been admitted at trial. He claimed that he was not given a Miranda warning and was coerced into providing a statement. The court acknowledged that Seale should have been given a Miranda warning but declined to reverse his conviction on this basis because he failed to raise the proper challenge at his trial. Seale raised several other arguments regarding the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence introduced at trial. The court held that the trial judge and jury had opportunities to consider these issues and were better-suited to evaluate issues of relevance and credibility of witnesses during the trial. Judge Harold DeMoss, who authored the original Fifth Circuit panel opinion that had reversed Seale’s conviction, dissented from the majority opinion, again stating his view that Seale’s conviction should have been reversed. He first reiterated his position that the entire prosecution was time barred by law. He also opined that Seale had raised the Miranda issue at trial indirectly, and thus that the conviction should have been reversed because Seale was not read a Miranda warning prior to his statement to the FBI in 1964. The full opinion may be downloaded here: http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/07/07-60732-CR3.wpd.pdf.
Panel (if known): Davis, Smith, DeMoss
Argument Date:
Argument Location:
Date of Issued Opinion: 03/12/2010
Docket Number: 07-60732
Decided: Affirmed
Counsel: Tovah R. Calderon and Jessica Dunsay Silver for the United States; Kathryn Neal Nester and George Lowrey Lucas for James Ford Seale
Author: Davis
Circuit: 5th Circuit
No comments:
Post a Comment