We need more elected officials with courage and character like those on the Manatee County Commission. From Florida Phoenix:
Powerful Florida developer hears a rare response from Manatee County: No!
Billionaire builder Pat Neal wanted to put houses in a flood-prone area despite neighbors’ objections, but commissioners rejected his request.
There’s a tradition that when someone sings Handel’s “Hallelujah Chorus,”everyone has to stand. So please rise as I warble several heartfelt hallelujahs over what the Manatee County Commission did last week.
The headline in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune tells only half the story: “Manatee County commissioners deny development of hundreds of homes in Parrish.”
Missing words from this summary include “in a flood-prone area.” Also missing: “Wetlands were going to be wiped out” and, most surprisingly, “The developer is one of the most politically powerful people in the state.”
Oh, and, “The commissioners were unanimous in rejecting it.”

Of course, the developer, former state senator Pat Neal, told the Herald-Tribune he plans to fight the decision: “Standby. This is not over.” I picture him singing this like King George III in “Hamilton” telling the rebellious Americans, “You’ll be back!”
We’ve seen a lot of discouraging environmental news lately. Gov. Ron DeSantis has decided that reviving his national political profile by building a detention center with a catchy nickname is more important than saving the Everglades. He also vetoed money to tear down the old Rodman Dam and restore the Ocklawaha River. Meanwhile, the Legislature slashed the funding for buying more land to preserve it.
In so dark a world, a move like Manatee County’s shines like a rare beacon of hope.
“The board’s denial … is the first time commissioners have outright denied a project pitched by one of the region’s most prominent developers,” the Herald-Tribune reported.
Here’s how it happened: “A few of us strangers who are neighbors banded together; that’s what made it possible,” one of them told me this week.
‘Make me an offer’
Neal’s Linkedin page says he’s been the CEO of Neal Communities since 1970, which is a loooooong time to be doing just one thing. He’s built 25,000 homes so far.
He’s also taken control of a lot of land. In 2014, the Bradenton Heraldreported that Neal was trying to snap up as much ranch and farmland as he could to convert it to residential and commercial buildings, regardless of size, location, or zoning.
“If you have land, we want it,” Neal told the paper. “You can even put my personal cellphone number in the newspaper. Make me an offer.”
Forbes magazine ran a more recent profile of Neal noting the current economic slowdown. The headline said, “He made a billion building bouses for Florida’s ‘Marvelous Middle.’ Now things aren’t so marvelous.”
Yes, you read that right. The business magazine estimates Neal’s company, Neal Communities, is worth $1.2 billion-with-a-b.
He hasn’t been shy about sharing his wealth with quite a few political entities. In just the last three years he’s donated $50,000 to the Florida Republican Party and $45,000 to Senate President Ben Albritton — ironic, considering Albritton claims to be a champion of the state’s remaining rural areas.
His biggest contribution of all, $200,000, went to a PAC named Better Roads for Florida that’s — surprise! — headed by an executive of Neal Communities. I wonder if he just moved the money from his left pants pocket to his right one.
Because of his generosity, when Neal wants something, he usually gets it.
For instance, he wanted this year’s Legislature to block local governments from making any changes in their development codes that would better protect people from hurricane damage. With Senate Bill 180, he got what he wanted. Gov. DeSantis, apparently feeling he hadn’t done enough horrible things to our state this week, signed it into law on Monday.
Like the Wizard of Oz, though, Neal prefers not to be seen pulling the levers of power. He deploys a cadre of consultants to speak for him. In April, when he made a rare personal appearance at a Manatee County Commission meeting to talk about more road construction as a solution to developer-caused traffic congestion, he admitted it was his first time standing before the board since 1979.
He didn’t show up in person to push Porter Ranch. Instead, the petitioner was one of Neal’s companies, this one named SimplyDwell, which had requested a rezoning of 217 acres of agricultural land.
SimplyDwell would use that rural land to build a new subdivision of 440 homes. But the board said a word Neal seldom hears: No.
“The county commission is correct to reject Pat Neal’s proposal to build in a flood zone,” Glenn Compton of the venerable environmental group ManaSota-88 told me. “It’s encouraging to see locally elected officials place the public’s interest ahead of a developer’s profits, something that rarely happens.”
Parrish is perishing
Parrish is an old farming community, named for a pioneer rancher named Crawford Parrish. Like a lot of Florida farming communities in recent years, parts of it have been smacked by sprawl.
Cows got moved out as developers moved in, building 1,000-home subdivisions. Out went the pastures, in came the pickleball courts and dog parks. Longtime residents fear their quiet, old Parrish is perishing.
The previous version of the county commission threw their door open wide to allow in all of that change. They approved every developer request, no matter how damaging to its neighbors.
They even voted 6-1 to get rid of the county’s strict wetlands protections, despite how important wetlands are for flood control and groundwater recharge.
Voters could see what was going on. Many had turned out to oppose the wetlands rollback, only to see their commissioners ignore their wishes and kowtow to developers.
Meanwhile, all the new development made their traffic and stormwater problems much worse, especially when Hurricane Debby hit last August.

“My whole house had a moat,” recalled Ariel Lowe, whose Parrish property backs up to the site of the Pope Ranch development. She keeps goats, chickens, and other livestock: “My animals looked like they needed snorkels.”
The Pope Ranch property fared about the same as she did, she told me: “Where they were trying to build got saturated from being totally flooded.”
The neighbors could all picture Neal’s development pushing the floodwaters off the Pope Ranch property and onto their own.

After the storm, “there was a flooding forum and I was a part of that,” said Abbey Tyrna, executive director of the environmental group Suncoast Waterkeeper. “A lot of the people who showed up seemed surprised to see that they weren’t alone.”
The forum, organized in part by the East Manatee Preservation Association, drew a packed house, said other participants. County officials at the forum acknowledged that much of their floodplain data are outdated and obsolete, which was far from comforting.
Tyrna told me her main message to the forum attendees was how important wetlands are for soaking up flooding. Get rid of them and the flooding is bound to get worse.

Another of the neighbors of Pope Ranch, Kate Horne, told me that they’ve already lost too many wetlands because “the previous commission just approved everything.” She could tell the loss of wetlands has gone too far because “I’ve had flooding on days when we had no rain.”
Snow in Florida
Whenever I have questions about Manatee County, I call up former commissioner Joe McClash, who publishes the Bradenton Times. He told me the unpopularity of the wetlands rollback, followed by the flooding, helped doom the pro-development county commission.
Then, making the voters even angrier, DeSantis appointed one of the pro-developer county commissioners to be the new supervisor of elections, despite having zero experience at running elections.

McClash joked that DeSantis, by removing one of the commissioners, deserves the credit for allowing the voters to flip a majority of the commission seats during the fall election. So did the decision by the most pro-development incumbent to run against the lone anti-sprawl commissioner – and then he lost.
Suddenly, there was a new commission majority — still all Republicans, but for a change willing to listen to their constituents. The new commissioners were talking about imposing a one-year development moratorium and requiring developers to pay much more in impact fees.
The developers, not accustomed to such independence, made noises about not negotiating.
“They told me it would have to snow in Florida before I could get the builders to come and see me,” one of the new commissioners said.
Meanwhile, when the commissioners tried to restore the wetlands rules that had been in place before, they were slammed against the hall lockers. The bullies were four, count ’em, FOUR state agencies that answer to DeSantis, each one questioning whether being so protective of wetlands could possibly be legal.
“This is bat s*** crazy,” one of the newer commissioners said in disbelief.
This should give you a good idea of why the commissioners reacted the way they did to seeing the proposal from Neal to build more than 400 new homes at Pope Ranch.
The ranch, by the way, is in a designated Coastal High Hazard Area. And the plans called for destroying wetlands to make room for the entrance and exit roads, Lowe told me.
If the plans had been approved, Lowe said, she knew what would happen during the next flood. The roads in and out would have been underwater.
“He would’ve left everybody in that development landlocked,” she said.
Selling swampland
To speak for this unpopular project, Neal dispatched a platoon of planners, consultants, and engineers, plus his longtime attorney, Ed Vogler. Vogler insisted that the development wouldn’t make the region’s flooding worse.
“We sympathize, we empathize, we understand” the objections of the neighbors, he told commissioners during a May meeting. He said Neal was willing to take “extraordinary measures” to deal with the flooding, adding, “We can’t solve the historical problems, but we can make it better.”

Nobody bought it, though. One opponent, Mark Van De Ree, joked, “I’ve lived in Southwest Florida almost my whole life, but I didn’t know we were still selling swampland to Yankees.”
Indeed, Tyrna pointed out to me that the Porter Ranch plans submitted to the county showed no buffers along Gamble Creek, the source of much of the flooding. Instead, she said, “they showed some Adirondack chairs lining the creek.”
Those chairs look nice, but they don’t do much to soak up floodwaters.
Because Neal was asking the county for a rezoning, that made it easier for the commissioners to tell him no, McClash said.
The developer knew that land was zoned for agriculture when he bought it. There was no legal guarantee that he would be able to change the zoning to build a subdivision.
That’s something for other counties to bear in mind when destructive projects like this come up. Given how the governor and Legislature have tied their hands to keep them from restricting development, the smart thing to do is to stick to what’s in their growth and zoning plans. Don’t let builders build in places that have been deemed inappropriate.
Another is to focus on the needed infrastructure, such as roads, stormwater ponds, and sewage lines. Urge your county to require those facilities be built upfront.
“We know we can’t stop development, but we can slow it down long enough to get everything in place,” said Lowe.
Several people mentioned to me the importance of networking for pulling the neighbors together to fight damaging development. Whether meeting in person or virtually over social media, connect the community so they can all rise up together.
Another piece of advice: Stick to what the evidence shows.
“We can’t fight with emotion,” Horne told me. “We have to fight with facts.”
If you live in another part of Florida that’s being inundated by a flood of poorly planned development, follow these steps in shoring up your defenses.
Then, if you succeed in saving your slice of paradise, feel free to cut loose with a whole chorus of hallelujahs. I promise that when you do, I’ll stand up, and so will everyone else who really cares about our state.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. AP and Getty images may not be republished. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of any other photos and graphics.





25 comments:
Powerful Florida jobs creator takes nun chucks to the head of Karen Keating Josephus... rapid and repeated nun chuck blows to the head of Ed Slavin as well.
Anonymice hatred of two citizens who care about our County and its future. So juvenile. Pray for the Anonymice. Who are they?
Foreign-funded, landraping developers are "worse than any carpetbaggers," in the immortal words of reform former County Commissioner Ben Rich, Sr.
"What we need in the United States is not division; what we need in the United States is not hatred; what we need in the United States is not violence and lawlessness, but is love, and wisdom, and compassion toward one another, and a feeling of justice toward those who still suffer within our country, whether they be white or whether they be black." -- Senator Robert F. Kennedy, April 4, 1968, in Indianapolis, after the murder of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in Memphis.
"Pete" and the other Anonymice -- who are they? Why so violent in their imagery? They can't handle criticism of developers, so the emit violent words and imagery. No class. No character. No honor. Your sins have found you out. (Psalm 2)
Violent bloody imagery depicting four (4) wonderful women who have had the fortitude to speak out against overdevelopment landraping clearcutting destruction of nature. Who does that?
Spelling is not their strength. Pray for them.
SJC has the same engineering firm as developers, ENGLAND-THIMS & MILLER. One former PZA member, ZACHARY WATSON MILLER, served for 1.5 years. His father is DOUG MILLER, co-founder of the engineering firm of ENGLAND-THIMS & MILLER. Confounded by lack of conflicts checks, as when County Commission voted 3-2 to hire RICHARD CHRISTIAN KOMANDO and the corporate law firm of BRADLEY, GARRISON & KOMANDO, P.A. as County Attorney, by 3-2 vote on April 15, 2025.
One former County Commissioner said that he had never heard the term "organizational conflicts of interest." When we get a new County Attorney, I know they will give higher quality legal advice than the current and prior County Attorneys, who seem to count to three (as in three Commissioners) to figure out what to say. The fact that KOMANDO issues ukases instead of written legal opinions is, at best, inculpatory. I don't believe that KOMANDO is a very good attorney. Neither is "Pete," his chauvinistic defender on this blog. Did they ever study the IRAC method? We need logical legal scholars and dogged investigators, not lapdogs in such cushy County jobs.
How would St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners attract and retain qualified attorneys after how they treated County Attorney David Michael Migut and County Attorney applicant Thomas McFarland? Several of our Commissioners don't respect independent legal advice. They want hey-boys and hired hands.
Then-Commissioner JEREMIAH RAY BLOCKER had a Masters of Law degree in real estate development law from the University of Miami. Smart guy, but a smart aleck who failed to protect the interest. He scorned County Attorney Thomas McFarland, four (4) times elected County Attorney in Roane County, Tennessee. BLOCKER said there were "cultural differences," and another Commissioners said they preferred "St. Johns County experience." Thomas McFarland soon thereafter went on to be elected the Chancellor (Chancery Court Judge) for four (4) Tennessee Counties.
By "cultural differences," what did BLOCKER mean?
Tom McFarland had a valid Florida law license and more varied and diverse legal experience than BLOCKER. Not one Commissioner voted for Tom McFarland. Wonder why? Our hopelessly provincial SJC Commissioners feared fresh eyes in the County Attorney's Office, fearing that they would give good legal advice. Ask questions, demand answers and expect democracy.
When you have a $1.6 billion annual budget and hesitate to hire the best people, you're betraying SJC citizens and taxpayers.
We need a County Charter, an elected County Attorney, an Ombudsman, closer controls, better data and major reforms.
But we do have eight (8) full-time equivalent (FTE) Public Relations employees, up from one (1) a few years ago.
Adlai Stevenson said, "As scarce as truth is, the supply seems greater than the demand."
"Cultural differences?" Prejudice against Tennessee and Appalachia on the part of defeated developer-funded Commissioner JEREMIAH RAY BLOCKER? You tell me.
Of course, Attorney "Pete" sides with powerful developers and disregards flooding hazards. So what if dozens are missing and dead in Texas from floods? Throw 'em a life preserver! The almighty dollar rules, right "Pete?" Slash and burn and clearcut those wetlands for another development! Hey Ed, did you know that Pete/Atheist Pizza News is a "social Democrat" but an environmental Genghis Khan?
You got proof and evidence for violent imagery? No, you don't. You got proof and evidence for corruption and wrongdoing by BKG? No, you don't. You dislike democracy... move to Russia.
Flood damage is way more prevalent on the coast... let's get some protest over counties allowing homes to be built basically IN the water at this point. Also affordable housing. Let's complain about that AND good luck with that because of some of the political thought prevalent in N Florida.
Looks like it's going pretty good to me. Too bad people try to gain validity and credibility from false narratives, exaggerations, libel, and bogus claims. That's what I think. People should get a new hobby basically.
Things are going pretty good for Pete because the developer cartel is in control of the county. And he's a developer attorney. The only false narrative here is that he's not a developer attorney.
And if I cared enough to prove that I wasn't a developer attorney you'd never make another bogus claim again right? Probably not. I got no incentive to prove anything to people who make a plethora of bogus claims.
"And if I cared enough to prove that I wasn't a developer attorney you'd never make another bogus claim again right?"
An anonymous commenter can't prove any such thing, no matter how much he "cares." You're blowing smoke, as usual.
Post a Comment