Monday, March 16, 2026

ANNALS OF De$ANTI$TAN: DeSantis’ resolve to pass his vaccine policies strengthens as measles cases continue to rise (Christine Sexton, Florida Phoenix, March 16, 2026)

From Florida Phoenix: 



DeSantis’ resolve to pass his vaccine policies strengthens as measles cases continue to rise

Will the Legislature give him a victory before he’s term limited out of office?

BY: -MARCH 16, 2026 12:05 AM
A nurse gives an MMR vaccine at the Utah County Health Department on April 29, 2019, in Provo, Utah. The vaccine is 97% effective against measles when two doses are administered. (Photo by George Frey/Getty Images)

 Gov. DeSantis' push to change Florida's vaccine requirements for school children failed during the 2026 session, but the governor promises to keep working to pass it before being term-limited out of office. Will the Legislature go along? (Photo by Scott Housley/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)

His attempt to alter the state’s vaccine policies for school children failed during the now-concluded legislative session, but Gov. Ron DeSantis said late Friday that he remains committed to seeing his policies pass before having to leave his post in January 2027.

The 2026 regular session was DeSantis’ last as governor, but the Republican could have as many as three more opportunities in the form of special sessions to strong-arm his policies through a reluctant Legislature.

DeSantis already has called a five-day special session for congressional redistricting. The Legislature also must at some point reconvene to agree upon and pass a state budget after it was unable to do so during the regular session, although no official dates have been announced.

A potential third opportunity could be the special session on property taxes that DeSantis has indicated he wants.

“There’s more than one way to skin the cat on some of this stuff,” DeSantis said when asked about having the Legislature address some of his priorities this year. “I’m committed to seeing the policies ultimately prevail. And we’ll look to see what options that we have.”

DeSantis made those remarks during a press conference at a senior living facility in Jacksonville, during which he highlighted his legislative successes and disappointments in the session.

As he has done for most of the last two years, DeSantis criticized the Florida House specifically for the demise of his vaccine proposal, which he calls “medical freedom.”

With roughly two weeks left in the regular 2026 session, House Speaker Daniel Perez all but declared the medical freedom bill in the House (HB 917) dead when he said on March 4 that his chamber would not consider any bills during the last two weeks of the session that hadn’t already been heard by a House committee.

Despite Perez’s comments, the Senate continued to debate and ultimately voted, 23-15, to pass its version of the medical freedom measure, SB 1756

The House and Senate bills were not identical, although they shared similar provisions. Both bills would have allowed ivermectin to be sold by Florida pharmacists, a permanent ban on mandates for any mRNA-based vaccines, and establishing in statute a non-medical exemption from immunization requirements for school children based on a parent’s conscience. The exemption also would have applied to children in day care.

HB 917 also would have forced a broad range of health care providers, including physicians, dentists, nurses, and therapists, to treat unvaccinated patients by amending  the statutorily created “Patient’s Bill of Rights and Responsibilities” to make clear people have the right to access health care regardless of their vaccine status.

The House bill would have allowed the Florida Department of Health, the agency with oversight over medical professionals, to discipline any health care provider who refuses to accept unvaccinated people as patients or to treat them.

That provision was never part of the Senate bill.

Push coincides with increasing measles infections

The back and forth over vaccine exemptions came as the latest available Department of Health data show the number of measles cases in the state had increased to 132 as of March 7.  As the cases increase, so do the number of counties with reported outbreaks. While most (98) of the cases are in Collier County, there now are confirmed cases in 13 other counties: Alachua, Broward, Collier, Duval, Escambia, Hillsborough, Lee, Manatee, Miami-Dade, Osecola, Pasco, Pinellas, and St Johns.

About 76% of the reported cases (100) are in the 15-24 year age cohort.

Of the 132 cases, 15 are listed as probable, meaning they haven’t been confirmed. All the listed probable cases in Collier County.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

During his press conference, DeSantis credited the House in 2025 for passing what he called similar legislation, and offered that he’d thought the Senate would be the obstacle again this year.

“On the medical freedom. they have engaged on that and they’ve actually been very good on it. The members, the individual members in the House, have been very good on it,” DeSantis said. referring to a bill that cleared the chamber by a near unanimous vote but ran into trouble in the Senate.

DeSantis, though, was describing a different bill.

The House in 2025 did vote to pass legislation that would have required physicians to accept unvaccinated people as patients, another position advocated by people who oppose vaccine mandates and has been endorsed by DeSantis and First Lady Casey DeSantis. Similar to the 2026 bills HB 1299 also would have made the permanent the ban on mRNA vaccine mandates.

But last year’s House bill didn’t address school vaccines or whether parents should be allowed to opt out of them based on conscience.

In 2025, it was the Senate —specifically Stuart Republican Sen. Gayle Harrell — whose husband was a physician, who put the brakes on the bill.

It wasn’t until the mandate to treat unvaccinated patients was eliminated and the mRNA bans altered that HB 1299 received final passage from the Legislature.

Senate President Ben Albritton talks to reporters following the 2026 session Sine Die on March 13, 2026. (Photo by Jay Waagmeester/Florida Phoenix)

DeSantis acknowledged it was a “really tough lift” to get the Senate to agree with his positions on vaccines, and credited GOP Senate President Ben Albritton for helping to maneuver the 2026 bill through the chamber.

And despite Perez’s statements, DeSantis said he thought his health care priority would pass the regular session.

“I really believe that once it passed the Senate, I think everyone felt it was going to end up passing. I don’t know why the House, you know, didn’t put it in the end zone given that they  already had passed it.”

Assistance from Albritton again?

In a media availability last week, Speaker Perez said any substantive policy not passed during the regular session wouldn’t be revisited.

“Whenever we sine die [adjourn session] I would expect things to die,” Perez told a reporter. 

Albritton, on Friday suggested unresolved policy issues could be revisited during a budget special session.

The Senate president noted budgets can be accompanied by conforming bills — budget-related bills that, similar to other legislation — make permanent changes to statutes. There’s also “proviso” language in the budget that can be used to direct specific spending of appropriations, as well as implementing bills, which can make statutory changes but remain in effect for one year, like the budget.

“I’m expecting that there’ll be a conversation about a lot of things. What specifically, I don’t know,” Albritton said, mentioning the various types of bills that could be in play during a budget session.

DeSantis’ recent push on vaccines, though, wasn’t included in either the House or Senate proposed spending plans, or either chamber’s implementing or confirming bills, the Phoenix flagged during the press availability.

When asked if, given that, it would be appropriate to tie the issue to the budget, Albritton replied, “I would say that is a decision the Legislature would make. And we will see.”

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Independent Journalism for All

As a nonprofit newsroom, our articles are free for everyone to access. Readers like you make that possible. Can you help sustain our watchdog reporting today?

Creative Commons License

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. AP and Getty images may not be republished. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of any other photos and graphics.

Christine Sexton
CHRISTINE SEXTON

Christine Sexton has spent more than 30 years reporting on Florida health care, insurance policy, and state politics and has covered the state’s last six governors. She lives in Tallahassee.

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

MORE FROM AUTHOR

Sunday, March 15, 2026

Florida attorney general tries to make it easier to pave over wetlands: We all should object to Ashley Moody joining this anti-environment lawsuit (Craig Pittman, Florida Phoenix)

Why are our other-directed wealthy elected officials so hostile to wetlands and so prone to be fawningly obedient and obeisant to feculent foreign-funded corporate greed? You tell me. 

From Florida Phoenix: 


COMMENTARY

Florida attorney general tries to make it easier to pave over wetlands

We all should object to Ashley Moody joining this anti-environment lawsuit

FEBRUARY 23, 2023 7:00 AM

 Source: Southwest Florida Water Management District

Court cases can be quite entertaining. And I don’t just mean the fictional courtroom dramas on TV, ranging from “Perry Mason” to “LA Law” to “Law and Order: No Not That One, The Other One.”

In the four years I spent covering criminal courts for Florida’s largest newspaper, I saw some amazing cases. I saw one involving a pair of bumbling hit men who got lost trying to find their victim. I watched as a pair of identical twins got the court system tied up in knots trying to figure out which one had done what. I saw the trial of a guy accused of bigamy whose defense was, “I forgot I was married.” He was acquitted, too!

There’s a case going on right now involving Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody that is more outrageous than entertaining.

 Attorney General Ashley Moody attending the designation of Sen. Kathleen Passidomo as the next Senate President on Oct. 19, 2021. Credit: Danielle J. Brown

Moody, a Plant City native, is a former federal prosecutor, judge, high school cheerleading captain, and all-around overachiever. She was even the Strawberry Festival Queen.

As the state’s chief legal officer, she’s got her hands full. The A.G.’s office is supposed to protect consumers from fraud, enforce the state’s antitrust laws, go after drug traffickers and gangs, represent the prosecution in criminal appeals, and issue formal legal opinions at the request of public officials.

When Moody ran for attorney general in 2018, she vowed that she wouldn’t politicize the Cabinet-level office. The A.G.’s role, she said during a televised debate, “is not to advance a political agenda or pick topics that are personal to me and use the office to sue anybody I can come up with.”

Avoiding politics would be a big change from her hyper-political predecessor, Pam “Trump Can Do No Wrong As Long As He Gives Me Campaign Cash” Bondi.

Moody reiterated the point a year later in an interview with Politico:

“I did not campaign to be the attorney general to play politics with this office. In my term as attorney general, I will never do the bidding of anyone except the people of the state of Florida.”

Woo-eeeee, folks, it’s a good thing Moody wasn’t under oath when she said that. Otherwise, she’d be facing a perjury charge right now.

Rather than staying politically neutral and focusing on what’s best for Floridians, as she promised, Moody has jumped aboard every right-wing clown car that’s driven past her. She has done so even if the cause she champions is bad for Floridians.

She joined a Texas lawsuit to overturn Obamacare even though Florida has repeatedly led the nation in Obamacare signups. She pushed for including a citizenship question in the Census, despite warnings it would hurt the Florida headcount. She signed onto a lawsuit challenging the Biden administration’s cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, which would have been built nowhere near Florida.

She even joined a longshot bid to overturn the 2020 election and reelect Donald “You Say You Want a Revolution?” Trump. It failed, as did all these other kooky crusades.

In each case she’s been taking her cues not from Floridians but from the Republican Attorneys General Association, or RAGA (not to be confused with the Indian musical genre of the same name).

But now she’s signed onto the most raggedy RAGA lawsuit of all, one that’s aimed at hurting the environment. It’s an attack on our wetlands.

And from what I can see, Florida’s top lawyer has gotten herself mired in a legal swamp.

Land by the gallon

To the early pioneers, wetlands were synonymous with wastelands. You couldn’t plant or plow them, so what good were they? Better to drain them dry or fill them in and build something on top.

Boy howdy, were those early pioneers a bunch of morons.

 This area of the Wekiva River headwaters, as seen in 2015, in Orlando has been cleared for an industrial park project. Critics want FL to do more to protect wetlands. Credit: Wanda Jones

We know now that wetlands are vital to our existence. They recharge our drinking water supply, protect our property from flooding, filter pollutants from stormwater, and offer habitat for important species. They even soak up the carbon that’s been heating up our atmosphere and causing climate change.

A slab of concrete can’t do any of that.

Florida boasts more wetlands than any state except Alaska. It also has a greater diversity: mangrove forests where shrimp and fish spawn, freshwater marshes that feed migrating ducks, cypress domes offering a refuge for wading birds.

To developers, though, they’re still just an obstacle to be overcome on the way to the bank.

Selling swampland to unsuspecting buyers is a Florida tradition dating to at least 1908. That’s when an ambitious huckster named Dickie Bolles bought a big chunk of the Everglades from our cash-strapped state government.

Bolles dispatched salesmen to the Midwest to fool as many suckers as possible into buying a stake in a phony development named “Progreso.” They told the buyers they were investing in a “Garden of Eden,” a “Tropical Paradise,” a “Promised Land.”

There were lots of promises but not much actual land. What the buyers were sinking their life savings into — literally — was property that was still under water.

When the truth came out, one victim commented that he’d bought land by the foot and by the acre, but this was the first time he’d bought land by the gallon. A national scandal and federal indictments ensued.

‘Just kidding!’

The Clean Water Act, first passed in 1972, was supposed to change things.

It was supposed to protect wetlands from rampant destruction by requiring developers to get permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before dumping fill into any “water of the United States.” You will not be surprised to hear that a lot of the first enforcement actions the feds pursued under the new law were against greedy Florida developers.

But the anti-regulatory Reagan administration pushed the Corps to stop regarding developers as someone to be regulated and instead treat them as customers. Ever since then, the Corps has regularly issued more wetlands destruction permits in Florida than any other state.

Meanwhile, we’ve had years of fussing and fighting (and suing) over what constitutes the “waters of the United States,” or as the bureaucrats call it, WOTUS.

That acronym, by the way, is pronounced “Whoa-tus,” not “What, US?” But a lot of the people caught violating the Clean Water Act have blurted out the latter statement when apprehended.

The most recent wrangling over WOTUS began when the Obama administration came up with a new, broader definition in 2015 that developers, farmers, and oil companies — those great champions of the environment — claimed was too broad.

Then, in 2019, the Trump administration wrote a new definition that was — surprise! — much narrower. The Trumpian definition removed protections for more than half the nation’s wetlands and hundreds of thousands of miles of upland streams. In Florida, that worked out to about 6 million acresthat suddenly had no federal protection at all.

Not even the Trumpified Supreme Court could stomach that and overturned it.

In December 2022, the Biden administration unveiled a new definition, one designed to fix the errors of the Trump rule while also meeting the requirements of various court rulings of the past. The new rule “restores protections to waterways that have a ‘significant nexus’ to navigable U.S. waters,” according to Reuters.

Of course, the developers, oil industry, and Big Agriculture are not fans of saving the swamps and opposed the new definition.

Taking their cue from these corporate masters, Moody and 23 other members of the RAGA army — I call ‘em the Raga-naroks — filed suit last week to toss it out.

In the suit, the Raga-naroks argue that the new wetland definition is “unusually aggressive” and would harm “ranchers, farmers, miners, homebuilders and other landowners.” Apparently “water-drinkers” don’t count.

I asked Moody’s staff to explain why she enlisted Florida in this kooky crusade.

“Florida already has strong laws to protect our waterways, and we cannot allow the federal government to usurp the states’ traditional power over their own waters,” Moody spokesman Whitney Ray told me.

As I have pointed out before, Florida’s “Clean Waterways Act” is a sham, a law designed to fool the public into thinking we’re stopping pollution while not requiring the polluters to lift a finger. Everything in it is voluntary.

We might as well insert “JK” for “just kidding!” after the first word of the law’s name.

A waste of tax money

When I have legal questions about wetlands, the first person I call is Royal Gardner. To me, Royal is the King of Swamp Law.

He’s a professor at the Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport and co-director of Stetson’s Institute for Biodiversity Law and Policy. When he’s not teaching classes, he travels around the world offering his insights on wetlands protection. His Twitter handle is “@swamp_prof.”

 Royal Gardner. Credit: Stetson Law

The reason I value his views is simple. From 1989 to 1993, he was the top wetlands lawyer for the Corps of Engineers, the folks who issue those wetlands-destroying permits. He’s been on the inside as well as the outside.

So, I asked him what he thought of the new definition of WOTUS.

“EPA’s new regulation is a reasonable interpretation of the statutory term ‘waters of the United States,’” he said. He called it “a great improvement” over the lax regulations that the Trump administration put forward, which he labeled “an abdication of EPA’s Clean Water Act responsibilities.”

Then I asked what he thought of Moody and the Raga-naroks trying overturn it. He didn’t pull any punches, so if you’re politically hypersensitive you may want to skip the next paragraph.

“The lawsuit is a waste of taxpayer money and only underscores that the state is not serious about providing clean water for its citizens,” Gardner told me.

He also answered a question I hadn’t asked, but it’s one that any good lawyer would be wondering about: What happens if these anti-environment A.G.s win?

“If the lawsuit is successful, it’s unclear what the practical implications would be,” he told me. “The immediate effect is that we would revert back to the pre-2015 regime, which is currently being applied by the EPA and is very similar to the new rule.”

In other words, even if the Raga-naroks succeed, they’d fail.

‘You’re out of order!’

You may be wondering if I am — not unlike the OG swamp hustler, Dickie Bolles — making a lot of noise about a lot of nothing.

“So, Florida’s supposedly nonpolitical attorney general is wasting tax money on a political crusade,” you say. “So what? Sure, this bunch of yahoos uses government resources to grab a headline or two and please their big-money contributors. But does it matter?”

In Florida, the answer is yes.

In the waning days of the Trump administration, his Environmental Protection Agency agreed to something that Florida builders had been calling their “holy grail” for 15 years. Trump’s EPA said yes to handing off the job of issuing federal wetland permits to the state Department of Environmental Protection. Florida’s only the third state to do that.

“This action allows Florida to effectively evaluate and issue permits under the Clean Water Act to support the health of Florida’s waters, residents, and economy,” then-EPA Administrator Andrew “Industry Stooge” Wheeler said then. And he kept a straight face, too!

The DEP promptly started giving developers federal wetland permits with all the care and cautious deliberation of a NASCAR racer roaring into the last lap of the Daytona 500.

To make matters worse, the DEP’s wetland permitting decisions have been following the Trump-era narrow definition of wetlands, even after it was thrown out for being legally laughable.

The EPA under Biden has formally objected to Florida’s swampy chicanery, so far to no avail. As a result, the DEP is damaging groundwater recharge, flood protection, pollution filtering, and all the other functions of wetlands.

Is Moody’s move to join this foolish lawsuit a way to give the DEP cover for continuing to kowtow to developers? It wouldn’t surprise me.

But that, dear reader, is where I think you can do something.

You know that scene in the movie “And Justice For All” when Al Pacino’s angry defense attorney flips out and starts shouting “You’re out of order” at everyone? I think it’s time we tell Ashley Moody that she’s out of order.

Drop her a line at Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, PL-01, The Capitol, Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050. Or you can email her using the form found on her website at http://myfloridalegal.com/contact.nsf/contact?Open&Section=Attorney_General

Tell her you think she stinks for doing what the developers and Big Ag want instead of what’s best for Florida’s environment and citizens.

Use the subject line of “I Object!” That should work. It always does on TV.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Craig Pittman
CRAIG PITTMAN

Craig Pittman is a native Floridian. In 30 years at the Tampa Bay Times, he won numerous state and national awards for his environmental reporting. He is the author of six books. In 2020 the Florida Heritage Book Festival named him a Florida Literary Legend. Craig is co-host of the "Welcome to Florida" podcast. He lives in St. Petersburg with his wife and children.