Tuesday, July 21, 2026

NURSING HOME ELDER ABUSE CRIME: Nurse, CNA arrested in death of 93-year-old found in the snow at CT nursing home (Livi Stanford, Hartford Courant, July 21, 2026)

Thankfully, there's no snow in St. Augustine Florida.  But is there elder abuse and elder financial abuse, brought to you by billionaires and private equity, which has gobbled up formerly non-profit nursing homes, like our once-beloved BAYVIEW? You tell me.


From Hartford Courant:


Nurse, CNA arrested in death of 93-year-old found in the snow at CT nursing home

From left, Detective Heriberto Resto and Detective Jeff Lampson speak during a press conference Tuesday at Windsor Locks Police Department regarding arrests made related to the death of Margaret Healey, a 93-year-old resident at Bickford Health Care Center. (Jess Hill)
PUBLISHED:  | UPDATED: 

Two employees were arrested Monday in connection with the death of a 93-year-old resident at Bickford Health Care Center in Windsor Locks, who was outside for more than three hours on Feb. 8 before being found unresponsive in the snow by staff, Windsor Locks police said.

The resident, Margaret Healey, was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, had a history of wandering and was supposed to be secured in her room at the time.

Papy Bibo, a registered nurse at Bickford Health Care Center, which was closed April 10 by the Department of Social Services after Healey’s death, surrendered himself to the Windsor Locks Police Department and was charged with criminally negligent homicide and tampering with evidence, according to police. He was later released on a $25,000 bond, police said.

Uchenna Obi, a CNA who was reportedly overseeing Healey’s wing at Bickford Health Care Center at the time, also surrendered herself to Windsor Locks Police Department and was charged with first-degree reckless endangerment and tampering with evidence. Obi was released on a $10,000 bond, police said.

Both are scheduled to appear in Harford Superior Court on Aug. 7.

When staff found Healey on Feb. 8, police have said, she was unresponsive in the snow about 40 feet from the building. Staff brought a wheelchair to bring her back inside, where they changed her out of her wet clothes and used blankets to try to raise her body temperature, Lt. Paul Cherniack of the Windsor Locks Police has said. Police were not called until 6:23 a.m., Cherniack said, and EMTs on the scene pronounced Healey dead at 6:46 a.m. at the long-term care facility.

According to the arrest warrants, paramedics found Healey unresponsive in her bed hours after she was found but possibly alive. Due to a DNR order, paramedics’ lifesaving efforts were stopped, the warrants said.

A DPH investigation found the facility “failed to ensure its physician was notified of a resident’s change in condition; failed to notify the local police department within 15 minutes when a resident was missing from a facility; and failed to notify emergency services timely when a resident was found unresponsive outside the building in below freezing temperatures.”

Video surveillance of Bickford showed that Healey exited the facility through an employee entrance at the rear of the building. That door is not equipped with the alert system equipment, police said, “but is designed to remain closed and locked. A keypad adjacent to this door requires a code to unlock the door. Investigators learned that this door is often left propped open, but the access code is also printed by the keypad.”

The circumstances surrounding Healey’s death prompted the Windsor Locks Police Department to initiate a criminal investigation, which lasted several months.

Cherniack said at a news conference Tuesday that “over the months that followed, our detectives conducted an extensive investigation” which included reviewing surveillance video, interviewing and reinterviewing witnesses, examining medical and facility records and working in collaboration with DPH and in regular contact with the state attorney’s office.

“It is our hope that the completion of this investigation and the judicial process now moving forward will finally provide answers regarding the circumstances surrounding Miss Healey’s tragic death,” Cherniack said. “While nothing can undo the loss, we hope these actions represent an important step toward accountability and provide some measure of closure.”

Joining Cherniack were Detectives Sgt. Jeff Lampson and Heriberto Resto, who shared updates on the investigation, including that they believe there was an intent to cover up the incident.

“So they were trying to, in my words, to do some type of damage control, but they reached the point where they had to call 911,” Lampson said. “They didn’t call 911, which is what they should have done. That’s the basis of the warrants. Anybody that has any type of medical background, even at the lowest level, knows in a situation like that, you immediately call 911. And they didn’t.”

The detectives said they believed that Bibo and Obi worried that they were going to be trouble and that a statement was made that they feared going to jail if they didn’t fix the situation.

Resto said everybody in the facility was cooperative with police during the investigation.

“No one really had anything bad to say about Bickford with regard to the family and other employees I spoke to,” Resto said.

Lampson also said Obi, in a statement to police, said she “poked her head” in Healey’s room and saw her blankets at the foot of her bed and made the “assumption that she was still in bed.”

“She clearly didn’t give a thorough inspection like she probably should have,” Lampson said.

Resto said that decision “resulted in the death of Miss Healey.”

Lampson said there was nothing to suggest that Obi and Bibo were under the influence of anything when they were caring for residents at the facility.

Asked if staffing was an issue at the facility, Lampson said it is his understanding that staffing levels “were typical for that shift, with three CNAs and one supervisory nurse.”

As far as questions about how Healey was able to leave the facility through the back door, Lampson said the keypad was not functioning.

“The door was unlocked and I don’t think we were able to establish whether it was actually left ajar, but it was not locked,” Lampson said. “So somebody could have just walked out whether it was ajar or not.”

Lampson said when Healey left the building she walked all the way around the building down the long driveway to Main Street “where she fell in a snowbank on the sidewalk.

“It was frigid cold that night and she did not recover,” he said.

Clare Kindall, Healey’s niece, told the Courant that “the family is relieved that the arrests have been made.

“We are looking for justice for Aunt Peggy,” she said. “We believe there was clearly criminal conduct associated with her death and are looking forward to the process where justice can be done. We are hoping no other family will have to suffer what we did and we look forward to working with the legislature this fall to come up with legislative proposals to strengthen protections for residents.”

Kindall said staffing levels were clearly an issue but that “the existing staff did not do their job.”

Rep. Jane Garibay, a Windsor Democrat and co-chair of the Aging Committee, said overall that the “system isn’t built to oversee the amount of nursing homes we have.”

There are 233 nursing homes in the state.

“We don’t have the staffing,” she said. “We don’t have the training. I am worried about every nursing home in the state, in the country, to be honest.”

Garibay said she was troubled that the door was unlocked in the facility where Healey exited on the frigid night in February.

“That’s a violation,” she said.

She said at Bickford they were staffing employees out of an agency instead of hiring.

“It takes time to interview, hire, get the right people and give incentives,” she said. “And they chose to hire from an agency?”

Bibo reportedly is facing other open criminal cases, which Garibay said was also troubling.

Currently, the law in Connecticut does not prohibit someone from working in such a role if they are facing charges.

Garibay said that needs to change.





Monday, July 20, 2026

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects (Dan Diamond & Jake Spring, WaPo, July 20, 2026)

From The Washington Post:

Trump officials seek to weaken historic-preservation reviews of projects

The reviews under the law, known as Section 106, have bound up the president’s planned arch.

7 min
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters about construction at the former site of the East Wing on May 19. (Samuel Corum/Pool/FTWP)

AI Overview

The Trump administration is moving to rewrite federal historic-preservation rules to give agencies broader authority to advance projects with less public input and narrower protections for historic sites.

AISummary is AI-generated, newsroom-reviewed.


The Trump administration is seeking to loosen federal rules intended to protect historic sites, alarming outside groups who say the changes would allow government agencies and developers to pursue major projects — such as President Donald Trump’s planned triumphal arch — without soliciting public input.

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, a low-profile federal agency that oversees preservation reviews and advises the president and Congress, on Friday proposed significant revisions to a federally required process that governs changes to landmarks such as the National Mall, sites that are significant to Indian tribes and other properties eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The process currently applies to any construction projects that are on federal land or receive federal funding, as well as private projects that require any type of federal approval.

Under the current rules, federal agencies must undertake a multistep Section 106 review assessing the potential effects of construction projects and soliciting public input, among other requirements. The revised rules would let federal agencies build their own projects or grant approval for construction by private developers without public input, according to a proposed rule and an accompanying document obtained by The Washington Post. 

Trump officials have previously said the 60-year-old rules can hamper development projects and needed renovations and had called for the regulations to be overhauled. But the timing of the administration’s announcement and the breadth of the proposed changes caught many historic preservation groups off guard. 

“What is going to happen regularly is communities are not going to know that major projects are happening in their backyard until the bulldozers show up,” said Marion F. Werkheiser, a founding attorney at Cultural Heritage Partners, who has reviewed the proposed changes. Werkheiser’s firm is involved in litigation against the Trump administration over plans to alter the Eisenhower Executive Office Building and the Kennedy Center.

Scaffolding and tarp cover the building name at the Kennedy Center on June 30. (Al Drago/For The Washington Post)

Sara Bronin, who led the ACHP under the Biden administration, called the proposed rules a “sloppy, ill-conceived draft” and predicted they would be challenged in court.

Travis Voyles, a Trump appointee who serves as the council’s vice chairman, asked council members to vote on the proposed changes to Section 106 by this coming Friday, according to an email obtained by The Post. If council members support the new regulations, they could advance to the White House for the next step in the formal rulemaking process, Voyles wrote.

ACHP did not immediately respond to questions about the planned changes and whether the White House had directed them. The White House declined to comment. The Atlantic previously reported the proposed changes.

Experts said the rules govern changes to 1.4 million properties across the country, ranging from several thousand national landmarks to local historic districts and sites in many communities.

Several Trump administration projects, such as the president’s planned triumphal arch near Arlington National Cemetery, have been bound up in the ACHP’s historic-preservation reviews. Outside groups have said that the rules are essential to protecting key sites and public spaces and warned that the planned changes would undercut decades of precedent.

A scaled-down model of an arch proposed by President Donald Trump at the Great American State Fair along the National Mall on July 3. (Matt McClain/FTWP)

“This is not only a massive assault on laws that have benefited that nation for some 60 years, it almost completely eliminates the role of the public,” Charles A. Birnbaum, the CEO of the Cultural Landscape Foundation, an education and advocacy organization, said in a statement. “The proposal actually eliminates language that says: ‘The views of the public are essential to informed Federal decisionmaking in the section 106 process.’ How unAmerican is that?”

The proposal narrows what is considered a “historic property” that can be protected, tightens the scope on what is considered an “undertaking” affecting that property under the law, and makes the process of consulting states and the public optional. What qualifies as a historic property is now limited to places that are “geographically compact” and have been improved by humans at some point.

“For the avoidance of doubt, noncompact, unimproved natural features such as mountains, valleys, bodies of water, or landscapes, including ethnographic landscapes, do not qualify as property,” according to the proposal.

Outside groups said they had little chance of stopping this week’s vote. Twenty of the 24 seats on the ACHP are either directly appointed by the president or are reserved for the heads of federal agencies, such as the Interior Department, which are controlled by Trump.

The Trump administration has separately remade other federal panels, such as the Commission of Fine Arts and the National Capital Planning Commission. Those panels have swiftly advanced some of Trump’s pet projects, such as his planned White House ballroom.

Several Trump officials at an ACHP meeting last month shared their frustration about the existing Section 106 rules and said they supported reforms.

Michael Boren, an Agriculture Department official who oversees the Forest Service, said that some efforts to replace unsafe, decades-old infrastructure at ski areas that are on national land had been stymied by the regulations.

“When they’re over 50 years old, they’re historic structures and when we’re trying to replace them, we sometimes are delayed for years just by the historic piece,” Boren said.

Werkheiser said the change would exclude landscapes that tribes hold sacred that would have been previously considered under the existing rules, potentially opening them up to development and destruction by industry. That could also remove the law’s protections against projects such as one that would build power lines near Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello estate and spoil the view from the historic site, she said.

Bronin said that provision would allow the Trump administration to expedite some controversial projects, such as a planned copper mine in Arizona located on a sacred Apache site known as Oak Flat. Democrats and historic preservationists have said that the planned mine will destroy the site.

“In the urban context, taken to the extreme, this phrase may be used to limit protected properties to just a building or a handful of buildings — making larger historic districts, like the French Quarter in New Orleans or historic Savannah vulnerable to needless destruction,” Bronin wrote in a message.

Construction workers place a tarp over the scaffolding that surrounds the columns at the North Portico of the White House on July 9. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The proposal would also give federal agencies a new way to approve projects without reaching agreement with states, tribes or other parties involved in the review process. Historically, those decisions were memorialized through a “memorandum of agreement” negotiated with state or tribal authorities and other interested parties. 

The new rules would create an alternative called a “memorandum of decision,” allowing an agency to move forward on its own, without consultation with the states or the public. States and tribes would no longer be able to try to block a project or invoke a dispute-resolution process if they object. Agencies would still have to consult affected tribes but would not have to incorporate their feedback.

Several experts also noted that the current Section 106 rules have required the Trump administration to take public feedback on some of Trump’s projects. Under the new regulations, the federal government could unilaterally decide that public input is not in the general interest, exclude the public from the process, and issue its decision unilaterally.

“The agency is going to decide if it’s in the public interest to inform the public about what they’re getting ready to do in that public’s local community. And that just seems so Orwellian to me,” Werkheiser said.