Wednesday, July 15, 2026

ANNALS OF DeSANTISTAN: Environmental group drops ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ pollution suit after site shuts down (Liv Caputo, Florida Phoenix, July 14, 2026)

Happy Bastille Day!  We, the People, won another one, after months of effort. 

From Florida Phoenix:

Environmental group drops ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ pollution suit after site shuts down

‘We achieved the desired result with our Clean Air Act lawsuit. This detestable facility’s air pollution will not continue.’

BY -

 Protesters line the highway outside Alligator Alcatraz (Photo via Jessica Namath).

An environmental group seeking to punish state operators of the “Alligator Alcatraz” immigration lockup for alleged pollution of the Florida Everglades has withdrawn its case, the Center for Biological Diversity announced Monday.

Because the nation’s first state-run migrant detention center is fully closed, the environmental nonprofit says, its goal has been accomplished and there’s no need to continue its federal lawsuit.

“We achieved the desired result with our Clean Air Act lawsuit. This detestable facility’s air pollution will not continue,” Ryan Maher, a staff attorney at the center, said in a written statement.

The center filed the case two months ago in the federal Southern District of Florida, alleging the detention center was emitting hundreds of tons of toxic gases into the atmosphere without a permit, flouting the Clean Air Act, and demanded more than $120,000 per environmental violation per day.

It alleged the site’s 100 diesel-powered lighting towers and up to 200 diesel-powered generators — employed without a special air quality permit — consumed nearly 8 million gallons of fuel on an annualized basis and emitted hundreds of tons of carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides.

But the June closure of the facility, officially cleared out last weekend, has brought an end to any potential air pollution. Gov. Ron DeSantis confirmed last month that the center had been emptied of detainees and was being torn down. This came on the heels of persistent, weeks-long rumors that officials were quietly planning to end the temporary facility — which saw more than 22,000 detainees in its 11-month lifespan — despite federal and state authorities denying any “official” closure talks were taking place.

Despite this, the center vowed that its legal battles with the state are far from over.

“The fight continues to ensure that the site is fully remediated and the Trump and DeSantis administrations are held accountable,” Maher said.

He referred to another suit against the state brought by the center and environmental groups including Friends of the Everglades, the Miccosukee Tribe, and Earthjustice. That case alleged that Florida violated the National Environmental Policy Act in constructing the facility because they failed to complete a federal environmental study ahead of building.

First filed in June 2025, mere days after work began on the Everglades site, the case has ping-ponged across the state — with vastly different results. At first, a federal trial judge in Miami sided with the advocates and ordered the facility quickly torn down and deactivated.

But a federal appellate court in April found that the facility didn’t have to comply with federal environmental law because it was entirely state-run and — at the time — lacked federal funding. That three-judge panel kicked the case back to the lower court, which is expected to reexamine the matter sometime this summer.

The federal dollars referred to in the court decision involves a $608 million reimbursement long promised to Florida for operating the facility. At the time of the ruling, the state had received nothing but vague assurances that the money would come. In May, officials received the first $58 million tranche.

“We and our partners will not stop until every piece of infrastructure tied to this facility is gone for good, the damage is assessed, and Big Cypress is restored,” Maher added.

Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Will 7/14 SJC candidate forum limit free speech? Ed Slavin e-mail defends First Amendment rights

Update, July 14, 2026 at 9:00 PM.

In the words of Saint Augustine, "An unjust law is no law at all."  Apparently no one paid attention to Dick Williams' ukase. Three cheers for the 100+ who attended.  

Here is my July 14, 2026 e-mail to Dick Williams: 


On Tuesday, July 14, 2026 at 04:05:18 PM EDT, Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com> wrote:


Dear Mr. Williams:
2.  The milieu for tonight's session is  credible election fraud corruption charges by FDLE.   https://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2026/07/corruption-county-commissioners.html 
3. St. Johns County needs to get back to "regular order," too.  Don't presume to change the rules for tonight's forum at the last minute.  Due to your past receipt of developer contributions, people would perceive your new rule, ex nihilo, as a conflict of interest.
4. Alexander Hamilton once compared New Jersey to a "cask tapped at both ends," with New York at one end and Philadelphia at the other end.  
5. Likewise, St. Johns County faces pressures from real estate developers and extractive industries.  Our quality of life here is why people move here. 
6. We, the People have a right to ask questions, to demand answers, and to expect democracy. Jesus removed the money-changers from the temple.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleansing_of_the_Temple
7. We. the People have likewise repeatedly voted to remove monied special interests from the temple of our democracy.
8.  We, the People, have a reasonable expectation of probity in our officials, candidates and community fora. 
9.  Please cease and desist from your reported indecent demand of candidates to trim their sails.
10.  Please call me today to discuss your purported coup, belatedly changing the rules of tonight's forum.
11.  Mr. Williams, I have good and fond memories of your service on our St.  Planning and Zoning Board.
12  Mr. Williams, please don't attempt to chill, coerce, restrain or intimidate our rights to free speech tonight.  
13. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said St. Johns County was the "most lawless" in America. 
14. While citizens here have repeatedly won First Amendment victories here, it's like President John Fitzgerald Kennedy said during the Cuban Missile Crisis -- "there's always some poor S.O.B. who doesn't get the word."
15. Please see our St. Johns County Commission Chair Clay Murphy's written response, and St. Johns County Attorney Richard Christian Komando's written response, to my concerns about illegal gag orders, here:  https://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2026/06/let-freedom-ring-celebrate-independence.html

SJC Candidates forum set for Tuesday. (Ponte Vedra Recorder, July 8, 2026)

From Ponte Vedra Recorder:

Candidates forum set for Tuesday

Posted 

The Ponte Vedra Community Association, in collaboration with the Palm Valley Community Association, will host a public forum on Tuesday, July 14, featuring all candidates for the St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners in Districts 2 and 4.

The event will be held in the Contemporary Worship space on the second floor of Christ Episcopal Church at 400 San Juan Drive, Ponte Vedra Beach. Doors open at 5:30 p.m., and the event begins at 6 p.m. 

The Ponte Vedra Beach Candidate Forum is a nonpartisan event designed to ensure a fair discussion. An experienced moderator will lead the forum, during which candidates will answer questions and present their positions on the issues most important to St. Johns County voters.

Questions will be developed in advance based on community concerns; there will be no audience participation or open-floor questions. 

“Of particular note this year, both races are open to all registered voters in St. Johns County and will appear on all ballots,” explained Vicky Oakes, St. Johns County supervisor of elections. “All voters will have the opportunity to vote in both Republican races. This is known as a universal primary contest, in which the winner in each district will not face opposition in the general election.”

“We are thrilled to partner with the Palm Valley Community Association to engage and educate our community, especially in a year when every registered voter can vote for the candidates,” added Lori Wells, president of the Ponte Vedra Community Association. 

“Our two community associations are always seeking opportunities to encourage constructive discussion of issues important to our community,” said Greg Leonard, president of the Palm Valley Community Association. “With a universal primary this year, we expect strong voter turnout. We are proud to offer this opportunity for people to learn about all the candidates.” 

The primary will be held on Aug. 18.

The Ponte Vedra Community Association, established in 1946, strives to build a sense of community and preserve the unique qualities that make Ponte Vedra Beach a desirable place to live. The association communicates news and information about community activities and important matters through its newsletters, website and social media presence and fosters fellowship through great member events. 

The Palm Valley Community Association, one of the oldest continuously operating community organizations in North Florida, engages residents, celebrates community life and advocates for the Palm Valley way of life — through regular meetings, community events and its weekly in-season Farmer’s Market at the Palm Valley Community Center, 148 Canal Blvd.

CORRUPTION: Medicaid Fraud Control Units aren’t doing enough to control fraud. (WaPo editorial, July 14, 2026)

Washington Post editorial:

Medicaid Fraud Control Units aren’t doing enough to control fraud


Indictments and convictions are down, despite a surge in funding.

3 min
 
Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, speaks in Milwaukee on July 8. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Every state has a Medicaid Fraud Control Unit that is responsible for investigating and prosecuting health care providers who bilk the system. Many of these offices have been neither aggressive about nor effective at policing the spending of federal money.

Spending on Medicaid increased 68 percent from fiscal years 2019 to 2025, and federal grants to the anti-fraud offices grew 40 percent. Yet the rate of new investigations being opened fell 17 percent, indictments dropped 16 percent and convictions decreased 22 percent during that period.

These are the findings of a new study by the Foundation for Government Accountability, a conservative think tank. “As waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid has continued to climb, it’s clear that the entities responsible for prosecuting, deterring and convicting those fraudsters have let the American taxpayer down,” Hayden Dublois, the report’s author, said in an interview.

The inspector general at the Department of Health and Human Services reported in March that Medicaid Fraud Control Units have recovered $4.64 for every $1 spent. That impressive top line oversimplifies underwhelming performance.

The new study shows that the total amount of fraudulently spent Medicaid money recovered by states has been flat in nominal dollars but fallen when adjusted for inflation. There have been some exceptional recoveries, like a $650 million case in Virginia, but 19 of the 53 anti-fraud units recovered less money than they received in federal grants last fiscal year. (In addition to the 50 states, the other three offices are in D.C., Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.)

For every $1 billion in Medicaid spending, an average MFCU conducts only 15 investigations — and achieves less than one conviction, according to the report.

Scrutinizing these offices has become a focus of the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on fraud following scandalous abuses in Minnesota. Two weeks ago, HHS decertified New York’s unit, which cuts off federal funding.

Last month, the agency also declined to recertify Hawaii’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit on the grounds that the office obtained no indictments or criminal convictions from 2022 to 2025. The state responded that it has recovered $14 million from civil cases since 2021.

Targeting waste and abuse is necessary but not sufficient to save Medicaid, whose costs have ballooned in unsustainable ways because of the Affordable Care Act. Advocates for expanding coverage should be the angriest that states aren’t fighting harder, because the more fraud is allowed to fester in the system, the harder it becomes to justify spending more than $900 billion a year on Medicaid.



Senate Democrats Block Defense Bill Over War in Iran (Robert Jimison, NY Times, July 14, 2026)

From The New York Times:

Senate Democrats Block Defense Bill Over War in Iran

The vote reflected how the political debate over the conflict in the Middle East has sapped bipartisan support for a normally popular measure.

Listen · 4:46 min
The fate of the National Defense Authorization Act, a vital measure setting Pentagon policy and program funding, was left uncertain.Credit...Kenny Holston/The New York Times

Senate Democrats on Tuesday blocked the annual defense policy bill, registering their discontent about President Trump’s handling of the war in Iran just days after the administration formally notified Congress that U.S. military operations had resumed.

The vote reflected how the National Defense Authorization Act, sprawling legislation that outlines pay for American troops and almost always advances with broad bipartisan support, has become the latest political battleground over the war in Iran, which Mr. Trump undertook without congressional authorization.

On a nearly party-line vote of 50 to 46, Republicans fell short of the 60 votes they needed to bring up the bill for debate, leaving uncertain the fate of a vital measure setting Pentagon policy and program funding.

Democrats argued that Congress could not move ahead with the bill, which would authorize more than $1 trillion in military spending, while the administration was pressing forward with a war that has been rebuked by bipartisan majorities in both chambers.


Republicans want the Senate to take up the N.D.A.A., the defense bill, as though none of this is happening,” Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader, said on the Senate floor. “As though Congress can debate the nation’s central national security bill while ignoring the nation’s most urgent national security crisis. We cannot.”

He said backing the defense policy measure would be akin to Democrats signing “a permission slip for that recklessness that we see occurring in Iran.”

The move came just days after the United States and Iran resumed fighting, marking the collapse of the month-old cease-fire, and Mr. Trump notified lawmakers in a letter that hostilities with Iran had resumed on July 7. The administration argued that notice began a new 60-day period under the War Powers Resolution during which the president can continue military operations without authorization from Congress.

The standoff over the defense bill was the latest escalation in a monthslong political fight over the war, which has spilled into nearly every major national security debate on Capitol Hill.

Senator Mark Kelly, Democrat of Arizona and a member of the Armed Services Committee, said he had tried unsuccessfully to improve the defense bill through amendments before ultimately concluding he could not support even beginning debate.

“I tried to get it into a much better place,” Mr. Kelly said, explaining that several of his proposed changes were rejected before he voted against proceeding to the legislation.

Senator Peter Welch, Democrat of Vermont, argued that the legislation ignored the war in Iran.

“This National Defense Authorization fails to address the critical question that is before this country right now, and that is the war in Iran,” Mr. Welch said in a floor speech urging colleagues to oppose advancing the bill.

He also criticized the legislation more broadly, saying it “fails to address the changing nature of warfare, by spending half a trillion dollars more on weapons systems that are the weapons systems of yesterday,” while committing taxpayers to enormous new expenditures “with absolutely no outline of how we’re going to pay for it.”

Senator Tammy Duckworth, Democrat of Illinois and another member of the Armed Services Committee, likewise tied her opposition directly to the conflict.

“The Senate cannot authorize $1.14 trillion in defense spending — the largest defense budget ever proposed in our nation’s history — for Donald Trump to continue his illegal and disastrous war that Americans do not want,” she said in a statement.

“Simply throwing more money at an out-of-control military operation is not strategy; it’s a recipe for a forever war,” she added. “The stakes couldn’t be higher, and I cannot support a defense authorization bill that doesn’t include my amendment to end this illegal war.”

Republicans countered that Democrats were jeopardizing one of Congress’s most important responsibilities by injecting unrelated political disputes into legislation that directs spending for the nation’s armed forces.

Senator Deb Fischer of Nebraska, a senior Republican on the Armed Services panel, accused Democrats of putting politics ahead of national security.

“It’s really disappointing,” Ms. Fischer said. “I think it shows just how much politics has gotten to the point that it’s putting our country’s security in jeopardy. They’re putting party above country.”

The failed procedural vote left uncertain when, or under what conditions, Senate leaders would be able to begin consideration of the defense policy bill.

Robert Jimison covers Congress for The Times, with a focus on defense issues and foreign policy.