Wednesday, November 04, 2026

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: Musk threw his fortune at the midterms. Voters handed him a stunning defeat. (Faiz Siddiqui, WaPo, November 4, 2026)

xxxx 

From The Washington Post:

Musk threw his fortune at the midterms. Voters handed him a stunning defeat.

He deployed his wealth to elect Republicans. Their defeats raise questions about the limits of Musk’s political influence.

6 min
Elon Musk spent more than $400 million backing Republican candidates. (Evan Vucci/Reuters)

In the closing days of the midterm elections, Elon Musk, the largest individual political donor in modern American history, lobbed increasingly alarmist barbs about Texas U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico.

Musk, a Texas resident, said the Democrat sought to “open the borders” and “abolish democracy.” Talarico, he said, “will vote to trans your kids.”

But Texas voters on Tuesday resoundingly rejected that messaging, electing to send Talarico to the U.S. Senate.

“We just proved that all the money in the world is no match for the people of Texas,” Talarico declared in a victory speech, singling out Musk. “We just sent a message to every billionaire megadonor — every trillionaire megadonor.”

The win was part of a wave of Democratic victories that saw the party retake Congress — effectively neutralizing Musk’s massive political war chest and dealing the world’s richest man stunning defeats. 

Musk had retreated from the political spotlight since serving in the Trump administration during the first half of 2025. Instead, he made the midterms a full-scale spending war against Democrats, deploying his fortune on a scale unprecedented in modern American politics. 

He spent more than $400 million backing Republican candidates — eclipsing his contributions to President Donald Trump’s 2024 election — and used his massive platform on X to promote Republican campaigns and attack Democrats. 

Early Wednesday, Musk lamented the results, writing, “Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now,” before joking that his “election-interfering space lasers” had failed. He also reposted a warning that congressional investigations and heightened scrutiny could slow SpaceX’s progress. He reposted comments that appeared to blame the results in Texas and Georgia on demographic shifts. And he reacted to exit polling reflecting the centrality of the Iran war to voters, writing: “Interesting.”

The stakes were unusually high for the world’s richest person: Democrats had vowed to investigate Musk if they retook Congress, and Musk has mused about the possibility of political “vengeance” if they took power.

Days before the election, in a post pinned on his X account, Musk said a 2028 Democratic sweep would “result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.” 

“That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election,” he said, appearing to allege without evidence that Democrats would use their victories to reshape the electorate. 

The defeat in Texas is likely to sting for Musk, who relocated his residence and businesses out of California and into the Lone Star State following frustrations over covid-related closures in 2020. Musk found a welcoming regulatory and political environment among Gov. Greg Abbott (R) and Ken Paxton, the state’s attorney general. Tuesday’s results, including Abbott’s loss in the governor’s race to Democrat Gina Hinojosa, have reshaped the landscape. 

Among Musk’s largest donations was $168 million allotted to the Senate Leadership Fund, a majority of which was transferred to a political action committee backing Paxton, Talarico’s opponent in the Senate race.

The results also raised questions about the political influence Musk — and his vast fortune — can wield. They marked the latest setback for the tech entrepreneur, whose tenure overseeing the U.S. DOGE Service ended in turmoil and whose increasingly prominent role in Republican politics made him a polarizing figure.

Musk’s spending on races across the country through the Senate Leadership Fund, Congressional Leadership Fund and his America PAC largely fell flat, as Republican candidates were defeated in Ohio, Maine and Texas.

For Musk, it continued a string of recent political defeats — including a 2025 Wisconsin Supreme Court race that Musk said “might decide the future of America and Western Civilization.” Musk’s midterm spending exceeded the roughly $290 million he put toward sending Trump back to the White House and electing other Republicans in 2024. 

But the world’s richest person, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, kept a lower profile than in 2024 and early 2025, when he appeared alongside President Trump at campaign rallies and political events. 

Musk urged his more than 240 million X followers to support Republicans on Tuesday.

“Vote red today!” he posted shortly after 9:30 a.m. Eastern time. By Wednesday, the post no longer showed up on Musk’s account and appeared to have been deleted.

Musk poured more than $400 million into the midterms, pushing Republican candidates through an array of political action committees focused on Senate and House races and on Texas. He emerged as the largest individual donor to the midterms less than two years after a public break with Trump. 

Musk, a key Trump adviser during the early days of his second term, ultimately reconciled with the president — despite having accused himof being in the Jeffrey Epstein files. And he went all in for Republican candidates. 

In some cases, Musk’s involvement appeared to backfire, presenting his opponents a tantalizing foil. 

In the final days of the campaign, Talarico compared the race to a David-and-Goliath battle, casting Musk and other wealthy donors as the powerful forces arrayed against him.

“We are going up against our own Goliaths — those billionaire megadonors, those corporate PACs, the entire Washington D.C. establishment,” he said. “... On November 3rd, those goliaths aren’t going to know what hit them.” 

On Tuesday, the world’s richest person appeared to have been dealt a blow. 

“Tonight we defeated Goliath,” Talarico declared.







ANNAL$ OF TRUMPI$TAN: Trump taxed imports. Voters sent Republicans the bill. (WaPo Editorial)

From The Washington Post: 

Trump taxed imports. Voters sent Republicans the bill.


The midterms delivered a verdict on two years of protectionism.

4 min
Vice President JD Vance campaigns on Monday at the Toledo airport for Vivek Ramaswamy and Jon Husted. Both lost. (Tom Brenner/Getty Images)

Vice President JD Vance posted 617 words on X on Wednesday explaining the Republican midterms wipeout. “The reason we lost is the war” in Iran, he wrote, then called for the GOP to change “our relationship to Israel.” One word that did not appear in Vance’s postmortem: tariffs.

President Donald Trump won in 2024 partly because voters who were angry about inflation trusted him to make life more affordable. Two years later, the economy was again the dominant issue for voters, but this time, it was an enormous liability for his party.

More than half of voters named the economy and jobs among the three most important issues facing the country, according to a survey of more than 90,000 midterm voters by the research firm NORC in partnership with The Post and other sponsors. Those voters favored Democrats by 15 points. Two years ago, voters who identified the economy and jobs as a top issue favored Trump by more than 20 points.

The reversal was most dramatic among Americans feeling the pain. Voters who said their families are falling behind financially favored Democrats by 31 points. In 2024, such voters backed Trump by 30 points.

The Iran war certainly contributed to Republicans’ defeat. The conflict has driven up energy prices, and more than one-third of voters in the Post-sponsored NORC survey listed the war as one of the country’s three biggest issues. More than 6 in 10 of them voted Democratic.

But the economy ranked as a substantially larger worry. According to a separate Fox News Voter Poll, which had a sample of about 80,000 people, 66 percent of midterm voters said Trump’s tariffs have hurt the national economy and 64 percent said tariffs have hurt the economy in their area. Eighty-nine percent said the cost of living was a crucial or major factor in their congressional vote, and 63 percent blamed unusually high prices more on Trump’s policies than on factors outside his control.

Republican candidates saw the danger coming. Five battleground Senate nominees avoided mentioning tariffs at the party’s September convention in Dallas. So did Vance. Trump, on the other hand, boasted that tariffs were “making us much richer than we ever thought.”

As Election Day approached, the administration’s own actions suggested otherwise. Trump suspended tariffs on certain ground beef imports to lower grocery prices. After Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) appealed to administration officials, the White House exempted nine categories of Canadian products important to agriculture in her state. Collins lost anyway.

As red states in the Midwest such as Kansas and Iowa turned into competitive battlegrounds, farmers received some protection from protectionism. Tariffs raised equipment costs while trade wars reduced foreign markets for American crops. Instead of removing those costly distortions, the administration compensated farmers. A promised $8 billion bailout shortly before the election brought projected direct federal payments to farmers this fiscal year to about $55 billion.

Vance’s second prescription for Republicans, after “end the war,” is to “focus on cost of living.” He should follow that thought to its logical conclusion. For a generation, Republicans argued that prosperity comes from competition, open markets and letting American consumers decide what to buy and American businesses decide where to source their supplies. The party lost its way, and the past two years tested Trump’s proposition that Washington can make Americans richer by taxing imports, restricting choices and picking winners.

Voters have now rendered their judgment on that failed experiment. Trump doesn’t need to wait until 2028 to respond. If he wants to lower the cost of living, he has one tax he can cut immediately: his tariffs.