Sunday, May 24, 2026

National Eucharistic Pilgrimage’s Florida kickoff roots US history in the Mass. (Catholic Standard, May 23, 2026)

How cool is that!  Street closings expected, including on San Marco, on Sunday, May 24, 2026. Blessings!  From Catholic Standard: 

National Eucharistic Pilgrimage’s Florida kickoff roots US history in the Mass

A graphic depicts the 2026 route of the National Eucharistic Pilgrimage, which begins May 24 in St. Augustine, Fla., and ends in Philadelphia July 5. (OSV News graphic/National Eucharistic Congress)
National Shrine

Before the Declaration of Independence was boldly signed in 1776, before pilgrims feasted at what became popularly regarded as the “First Thanksgiving” in 1621, there was St. Augustine, Florida.

The coastal Florida city was founded in 1565 by Spanish Catholic explorer Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, is celebrated as the longest continually inhabited European-founded city in the U.S., and is home to the United States’ oldest continuously operating parish, the Cathedral Basilica of St. Augustine.

It is also the May 24 starting point for the 2026 National Eucharistic Pilgrimage, themed “One Nation Under God” in honor of America’s 250th year.

The pilgrimage begins on the historic grounds of America’s oldest Marian shrine: the National Shrine of Our Lady of La Leche at Mission Nombre de Dios, which Bishop Erik T. Pohlmeier of St. Augustine has described as “the oldest site of continuous Catholic presence in the United States.”

With its founding, St. Augustine became the site of an early Mass in what is now the United States, celebrated in 1565 to commemorate the landing of a Spanish explorer, his crew and Catholic clergy.

“As we focus this year on the Declaration of Independence and the 250th anniversary of that, St. Augustine helps us begin not with politics, but with worship,” said Jason Shanks, National Eucharistic Congress president. “And I think that’s critically important.”

Both the shrine and the mission, its caretakers say, “stand as living witnesses” not just to the founding of St. Augustine, but also to the practice of the Mass in the United States. The site roots its history in the landing of Spanish Admiral Pedro Menéndez de Avilés. In 1565, his crew sighted land on Aug. 28, the feast of St. Augustine, and Menéndez came ashore Sept. 8. The admiral claimed the land for Spain, “establishing the settlement that would become the first permanent European settlement in what is now the continental United States,” according to the shrine’s website.

Soon after landfall, the expedition’s chaplain, Father Francisco López de Mendoza Grajales, celebrated a Mass of thanksgiving.

The shrine and mission grounds, known as “The Sacred Acre,” still yield discoveries, said the shrine’s rector, Father Timothy Lindenfelser.

“We’re constantly doing archaeological excavations. Most recently, we found the foundations of the Franciscan church that was on the property. That was found with burials of Indigenous people around it, and then the kitchen that was connected to it,” he said. “Every time we do a renovation or do archaeological digs, we’re always finding new things.”

The mission and shrine’s website describes Father Francisco’s Mass as the “first Catholic Mass of Thanksgiving in what is now the United States, establishing the first parish and planting the roots of the Catholic faith in the New World.”

However, “we do not claim to be the first Catholic Mass in what is today the United States,” said Father Lindenfelser. “The first that’s documented would have been in Pensacola in 1559. The Spanish established a settlement there, so we know there were priests and Mass was celebrated. But the settlement didn’t last.”

Kathleen Bagg, the Diocese of St. Augustine’s communications director, elaborated, telling OSV News, “What makes St. Augustine historically significant is that the Sept. 8, 1565, Mass of Thanksgiving was connected to the founding of the first permanent European settlement in what is now the continental United States, and to a Catholic community whose presence has continued into the present day.”

“The phrase ‘first Catholic Mass of Thanksgiving in what is now the United States’ is intended as a historical distinction connected to the founding of St. Augustine, rather than a claim that no earlier Masses had ever been celebrated elsewhere in territories that later became part of the United States,” she said.

If the wording seems intentionally careful, it is because there is some historical wrestling over the location of the first Mass celebrated in what would become the United States of America.

“There are a whole series of Spanish expeditions into Florida and elsewhere in the Southeast, long before Pensacola was established in 1559,” said J. Michael Francis, a history professor and chair of Florida studies at the University of South Florida.

He noted expeditions led by Juan Ponce de León – the first of which made landfall in 1513, probably south of Cape Canaveral – as well as subsequent expeditions, and the settlement of San Miguel de Guadalupe.

“It hasn’t been located archaeologically,” Francis told OSV News, “but it was likely somewhere in present-day South Carolina in 1526. That settlement lasted for less than one year – but assuredly there were many Masses said at San Miguel. Then you have the 1539 Hernando de Soto expedition, and there were likely dozens – if not hundreds – of Masses said between 1539 and 1543 during the course of that expedition.

“So,” he emphasized, “this is where it gets really tricky.”

The 1565 Mass at St. Augustine, held on the feast of the Nativity of Mary, “is often attributed to an account written by the priest” – Father Francisco López de Mendoza Grajales – “who allegedly said that Mass. But he never says that in his account. What he says is that on Sept. 8, 1565 – when Menéndez, the founder of St. Augustine, comes ashore – they greet him singing the ‘Te Deum laudamus,’” a hymn of rejoicing.

Father López, Francis continued, “said Menéndez – and all of the others with him – approached him on their knees, and they kissed the cross. … But he never specifically says, ‘I said Mass.’ He says there were ‘other ceremonies.’ There’s another account – that has been attributed to Pedro Menéndez de Avilés’ brother-in-law – in which he says that on that day, Menéndez ordered that a solemn Mass be said.

“So what often happens with these kind of stories is that different sources get conflated,” Francis stressed.

Bagg pointed out what she described as another “important historical nuance.”

“While St. Augustine remained continuously inhabited as a city, Catholic parish life was interrupted during the British period (1763–1784), when Spanish clergy departed and public Catholic worship ceased until the arrival of the Minorcans and Father Pedro Camps in 1777,” she told OSV News. “Even with that interruption in sacramental life, the broader Catholic presence associated with the founding of St. Augustine and Mission Nombre de Dios remains foundational in American Catholic history.”

Ultimately, the St. Augustine site remains a place of witness. When the tourist trolleys stop at the National Shrine of Our Lady of La Leche at Mission Nombre de Dios, Father Lindenfelser says visitors often find themselves deeply affected.

“Many people have come back to the faith,” he said. “Some people have for the very first time heard the message of the Gospel, just because they were sitting there – and one of the chaplains or one of the staff, we come up and talk to them,” Father Lindenfelser said.

“So, it’s still today a great place of evangelization,” he added, “by just being present to those who come.”


"The Control Game": How PR Manipulates the Public, by Environmental Information Network


As Moses said, "
Be sure your sin will find you out." Numbers 32:23.

To the putative bosses, owners and controllers of St. Augustine, Florida, St. Johns County, Florida and St. Augustine Beach, Florida, including: HUTSON COMPANIES, DAVID HUTSON, his son, State Senator TRAVIS J. HUTSON and other-directed elected officials; insouciant and impertinent administrators; Russian investors and other secretive developers; unregistered lobbyists; GATE PETROLEUM; JOHN AND HERB PEYTON; D.R. HORTON; LOUIS JOHN ARIZZANI; ROGERS TOWERS corporate law firm; St. JOHNS LAW GROUP corporate law firm; devious developer puppets like Commissioners CHRISTIAN (sic) WHITEHURST, former Commissioner JEREMIAH RAY BLOCKER, defeated by 175 votes by Krista Keating Joseph, a Bold Gold Star mother, defeating the moneybags aligned with disgraced ex-SHERIFF DAVID SHOAR, et al.:

We've got your numbers.

(Photo credit: 2020, Ponte Vedra Recorder, showing State Senator TRAVIS J. HUTSON, newly elected Commissioner CHRISTIAN WHITEHURST and St. Johns County Clerk of Courts BRANDON J. PATTY).

Then there's creepy corporate conman convicted felon criminal President DONALD JOHN TRUMP

Then there his crass carping harpies like Vice President J.D. VANCE (could it be that J.D. stands for "JUVENILE, DEMAGOGIC"?) and wacky self-nominated "Secretary of War" PETER HEGSETH. Check out the new PBS Frontline documentary May 26, "The War Cabinet.  

I just watched two of these twisted twit tools, lousy louche lugubrious goobers, VANCE and HEGSETH give speeches on C-SPAN. Bothe spew animus, with lukewarm reception -- HEGSETH to West Point graduates and VANCE to Missouri rallygoers.

During the Great Depression, FDR taught Ameridans that "the only thing have to fear is, fear itself." In contrast, fear is the defining feature of TRUMPERY, along with flummery, dupery and nincompoopery.

We, the People are revolting against corporate oligarchs and their energumen unjust laws, war crimes and crimes against nature.
As our Nation's Oldest City's nameske, Saint Augustine said, "An unjust law is no law at all."

Watching the January 25 and April 26, 2022 and other "dog and pony shows" at the Saint Johns County Commission made me want to share the wonderful classic work, "The Control Game" by the Environmental Information Network," which figured out PR manipulation tactics at the Rockwell International/Department of Energy Rocky Flats Plant in Colorado.

We're on to your "control game" and all your works and pomps.

Your attacks on our rights will be vanquished. We, the People will be heard and heeded. Our concerns will be vindicated against the violence of your attacks on our nature and history.

Thanks to Paula Elofson-Gardine and Susan Hurst from the Environmental Information Network in Colorado, who made it their mission in life to expose the flummery, dupery and nincompoopery arising out of the Rock Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant and the government and corporate criminals who ran it:

Environmental Information Network: The Control Game

http://www.actionpa.org/activism/controlgame.html


THE CONTROL GAME

By E I N
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT OR PUBLIC RELATIONS: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
Originally Published 5/94, converted to HTML 7/97.
A REFERENCE GUIDE FOR RECOGNIZING POLITICAL/SOCIAL CONTROL TACTICS BY POWER BROKERS, LARGE CORPORATIONS, PUBLIC RELATIONS FIRMS, AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES.
Environmental Information Network (EIN), Inc.TM
P.O. Box 280087, Lakewood, CO 80228-0087 -- pjelofson@aol.com
Paula Elofson-Gardine, Executive Director/Susan Hurst, Publications Director
Tactic 1 -- Make it impossible for people to be involved: These typical control tactics set things up so that it's difficult and inconvenient for interested parties such as the affected public to participate.
Examples:
• Meetings are scheduled at inappropriate locations or times; i.e., during regular working hours, highway rush hours, dinner times, or deliberately conflicting times with similar interest meetings. Strict meeting "guidelines" and use of question cards discourages real dialogue and keeps attendees under control.
Variations:
• Schedule lengthy one-way presentations that will not allow give and take exchange. This precludes the public (including the press) from asking questions or clarifications.
• Conveners may insist that all questions be held until the end, by which time people are tired, the meeting area must be vacated, and the press has had to leave to meet deadlines.
• Allow the public limited time, and a limited number of questions that must pertain to their predetermined set of allowable topics; while the conveners drag out their answers, essentially filibustering away the rest of the time for the meeting -- and coincidentally time for open discussion of issues and answers that many attendees showed up for.
• Staff may be trained to be nice, while having been trained to handle the public by using subtle harassment or baiting techniques, which also discourages public involvement.
These tactics are used to fulfill requirements for public outreach in order to legitimize the process. If attendance is sparse it will be blamed on public apathy, rather than a deliberate effort to exclude public participation. Reject this pretense for public involvement. Short circuit this tactic by standing up as a group and announcing an immediate press conference that will give the press the real story from the citizens outside of the meeting room or across the street from the building, then get up and leave as a group. If this is not immediately possible, let the conveners know that your group will hold its own meeting, protest, and/or press conference the next morning and will continue to inform the media of their non-cooperation on these issues.
Tactic 2 -- Divide and Conquer: This is a well-established tactic that effectively places similar interest groups at odds against each other, when they would otherwise be a formidable force for bureaucratic responsiveness and accountability. This tactic uses existing tensions and divisions between organizations. Name this tactic as soon as you recognize it to short circuit its effectiveness. Make sure that everyone understands what interests they share in common, and why it is in their best interest to continue to work together. A few favorite tactics are described below.
Examples:
• Divide a large issue into many small ones. This forces people and/or organizations to fight many small battles, dispersing their energies. Small groups working in isolation of each other may not be as effective as coordinating efforts to maximize through solid communication and networking.
• Provide enough resources to cover only part of the problem. This can include preparing only a few copies of handouts or important documents so that self-imposed constraints prevent them from being able to provide x, y, or z service -- while it is obvious that there is plenty of budgetary allowance for gratuities, amenities, or items that fulfill their bias or agenda.
• Appoint a committee using key members of the public -- including appointees with views similar to the convener, funder, or directing agency to maintain their control of the committee. Their involvement is then publicly highlighted -- whether or not they attend or participate. Their names will be used strategically (sometimes in absentia), or photos are used to imply consent, agreement, or consensus with the committee -- although they may object or disagree with the viewpoint or findings of the committee. Citizens (token) used in this manner may or may not be aware of their names or pictures being used to artificially lend credibility to the committee or findings in question. In some cases, they may be unaware that they are considered to be a member of the committee.
• Many separate tables are used in large banquet or meeting rooms to break a meeting up into small discussion groups. This effectively keeps valuable information that would otherwise be revealed in the general discussion from being heard by the larger group, which would have enhanced communal brainstorming and questioning of the process or problem at hand. These small group discussions may then be summarized and reported back to the larger group. Carefully placed shills or committee members may serve as group leaders to control group feedback. This suppresses any controversial discussions that don't fit the convener's agenda, and inhibits networking or brainstorming on the issue.
• Seating arranged in "audience fashion" delegates you to a passive role in these meetings. Short-circuit this by playing Musical Chairs. Insist that the tables and/or chairs be moved (circle or horseshoe shape) so that everyone can be an active participant with the conveners or presenters. Put yourselves at the same level and/or table with the power brokers so there is no distance to allow them to feel comfortably in control (no shield). Convert their agenda to your agenda.
• Public relations campaigns (blitzes) into the community will seek out homeowners associations, service groups, schools, and so on, to present biased, incomplete, or misleading information to sidestep opposition to mould and win over public opinion about key issues.
Variations:
• Conduct private (behind closed-door or impromptu) meetings with civic groups, government, or public officials (i.e. city council, county commissioners, etc.) of similar political or philosophical leanings -- without informing citizens or organizations with opposing viewpoints of these meetings.
• Wrong information regarding time and location is provided -- too late to be corrected (The scavenger hunt). This ensures that their message will be presented without all sides of an issue being recognized or openly discussed.
The Government in the Sunshine Act legislation was passed by the U.S. Congress to discourage clandestine or private meetings of government bodies or officials for the purposes of excluding general public or interested parties.
Tactic 3 -- Pack the Meeting: The power brokers will encourage employees to attend x, y, or z meeting. They may also establish telephone trees (which we should be doing) to get employees and supporters to pack a meeting to simulate public support for their position on an issue, and to set the tone of the meeting.
Variation:
• Comment or question cards are used in place of a communal microphone for participants to go to, so everyone can hear and participate in the discussion. Their supporters will stack the deck of comment cards with time wasters, and may continue filling out more cards throughout the meeting to defuse opposition discussion (see tactic 1 -- filibustering).
Short circuit this by meeting with your neighbors, colleagues, or constituents for a pre-meeting conference to discuss opposition tactics and strategy that are barriers to getting your views aired. Come up with your own list of strategy and critical points, then divide them up among yourselves. Go to the meeting prepared with fact sheets, questions, and comments that support your views. Brainstorm with your colleagues, refine the information, then pass it around the neighborhood, or the target audience for and after the meeting. Call the tactics as you see them occur in the meeting to defuse them. Insist on a fair airing of the issues, within everyone's hearing.
Tactic 4 -- Economic Blackmail: When dealing with politically heated issues, especially "company town" polluters, the first threat may be that massive layoffs will occur if they have to: change a process, stop polluting, fix safety problems, clean up contamination, and so on. This is a Red Herring scare tactic that should be immediately brought to everyone's attention.
• In 1988, the Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Facility (RFP) was faced with changes that included decommissioning, the contractor threatened massive layoffs. Economic developers and chambers of commerce predicted local devastation. To the contrary, the cleanup has been a huge economical boost for subcontractors and RFP personnel, who have nearly doubled the numbers of employees that were needed for full production and chemical recovery of plutonium pits for nuclear warheads.
• Retraining and educational programs have blossomed at local colleges. The people to watch are the Developers and Chambers, who will attempt to create new projects, while "dumbing down the workforce" by bringing in minimum wage workers for cleanup jobs, lay off union people, and funnel profits to special interest chums. Stay united, call that tactic, and make them accountable.
No one likes to be picketed, boycotted, or pictured negatively in the press -- these citizen tactics are relatively easy to implement.
Tactic 5 -- Give the appearance of action without doing anything: When faced with an obvious need for change, bureaucrats may try to give the appearance of taking action without actually doing anything. These tactics may sound like this:
• "We have decided to appoint an advisory, special, sub-committee, or commission to study or handle the problem. We want (or need) members of our group to volunteer assistance because we do not have money for staff."
• "Your knowledge, input, or time is so valuable (and so on), we would like you to help us with x, y, or z to work out solutions" (but they will fail to assimilate your information, suggestions, or concerns).
• "We would like to help you by doing x, y, or z for you" -- but the reciprocal help never appears (carrot on the stick).
• "We plan to issue a policy or statement regarding that problem next week, month, year..., so that everyone will know what to do in the future..." Beware of bureaucrats stealing your uncompensated time to tie you up, keeping you out of circulation in the community. Volunteerism can be abused, becoming a time quicksand.
Don't accept inconsequential actions, excuses, and "donothingitis". Set a reasonable amount of time for genuine action, and then tell everyone that you expect action by that date. Think twice before joining "study committees or advisory groups" that are not policy-changing bodies that have no real power to do anything about the issue or problem in question, are funded and directed by your adversary, or by those that represent the other side of your issue. There may not be an accurate record of what has happened from the beginning, during, or at the end of these efforts. Refusal to allow the recording of meetings, or have an accurate paper trail to document important meetings and proceedings is a serious red flag of cover-ups and problems.
Tactic 6 -- Give them a Red Herring, or Get them to Chase the Wrong Bunny: This is an issue or information offered to belittle, patronize, or confound and derail your efforts. When a bureaucrat tries to change the subject from what you are concerned about to what they want you to focus on, they are using a "Bait and Switch" routine.
Examples:
• "I don't know what you're talking about; You don't know your facts; That issue is not important; Why are you interested in that issue?; You have not done enough research; You aren't an expert; Your issue is beside the point, irrational, emotional, or not practical; Why don't you check into, or work on x, y, or z, instead?"
• Engaging attendees in detailed explanations or debates that are intended to sidetrack the issue of concern, hoping that in the heat of debate, you will: Give up, get tired, go home, and forget the key issue.
Be aware of time wasters that will eat up meeting time, and are designed to wear you down. When confronted with this tactic, don't get side tracked. You don't have to be an expert to ask questions, ask for information, or to have legitimate concerns.
Write notes throughout the meeting -- this will help keep you on track. Stick to the issues you want to discuss, while making a special note to follow up, or address the other person's issue later, if they genuinely desire to do so.
Tactic 7 -- Refuse to give out information, or make it impossible to get it: Bureaucrats plan that this tactic will discourage you, so that you will give up and go away. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) format may have to be invoked to get cooperation. You must know what information you need, what agency to request it from, and what to look for. The "Key and Lock" buzzwords and descriptions must be included, or the very information you seek may be withheld from you.
Examples:
• Bureaucracies protecting damaging information may try to charge exorbitant fees for information to be searched, copied, and sent to you. Request fee waivers based upon public interest needs and public right-to-know laws.
• The requestor may be flooded with huge amounts of useless information that is out of order and out of date. This is called a data dump in legal circles. This is a common tactic used by legal rivals on cases to eat up valuable pre-trial discovery time. It takes a critical eye, speed reading, and some research or historical knowledge to be able to weed through the useless information to find what you want.
To deal with the system effectively, you need the facts. If you have the facts, the system has to deal with you more openly. Democracy depends on people having the information needed to allow meaningful input and interaction with the system. The refusal to give out information may sound like this:
• "We don't have that information; x, y, or z is not in today, and I'm not authorized to fulfill this request; We can only give out a summary (They decide what is meaningful, included, excluded, or redacted); Why do you think that's important?; Justify your interest, or legitimize your need; We don't think you need that information."
Recognize these tactical phrases meant to put you off the track of the information you need to level the playing field with your opponent, and don't accept lame excuses for non-performance or non-compliance.
________________________________________
STRATEGIES TO SHORT CIRCUIT THE CONTROL GAME
• AS SOON AS A TACTIC HAS BECOME APPARENT, LABEL IT: When you name that tactic publicly, it loses its power. You can counter these tactics with a minimum of wasted effort by keeping the lines of communication open with your colleagues and other similar interest organizations.
• BE OBSERVANT OF INTERACTIONS, TACTICS, AND WHO MAY BE CALLING THE SHOTS BEHIND THE SCENES: Recognize that although individuals make up the bureaucracy, they should not be the targets of your efforts. Evaluate where strategic counter-tactics would be the most effective. Good mottoes to keep in mind. Always go to the top, and the squeaky wheel gets fixed.
• DO NOT ALLOW BUREAUCRATIC FIGUREHEADS TO LABEL YOU as a troublemaker, or as someone with emotional or personal problems (i.e.: "Psychiatrically" linked to a site or set of issues, don't have a life because you volunteer a lot of your time, are a paid staffer or knowledgeable citizen, so your opinion doesn't count, or don't have "x" number of constituents behind you.) to legitimize side stepping serious issues and/or your concerns. Be alert to the evaluative patronizing concern look. This is contrived to give the appearance of questioning your mental or emotional stability to elicit a reaction. Keep cool and don't give them the reaction they want from you. Any person might become dedicated to seeking solutions, and become angry or frustrated over the distancing treatment bureaucracies and corporations use to keep the public at arm's length over difficult issues.
• MAKE YOUR ISSUE OR ADVERSARY AN OBJECT OF INTENSE STUDY: Never stop questioning your previous conclusions about them. Get all the information you can and keep getting it. Put this information to productive and meaningful use, then network it around.
• NEVER RELAX AFTER A VICTORY, and don't underestimate the power of determination.
• RENEW YOUR OWN OUTREACH REGULARLY by having current concerns and information prepared and ready to distribute at every opportunity. Use their meetings for opportunities to pass out your own targeted information. Use several people to see that all attendees end up with copies of your information. Ask local copiers or businesses to help duplicate materials.
________________________________________
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." -- Margaret Mead, Anthropologist
"Ignorance is compounded by the sins of omission." -- Dr. Edward A. Martell, Radiochemist
"Reports based on faulty foundations of inconsistent, missing, or biased data are meaningless, misleading, and worthless. To deliberately present bad data as if it were meaningful is scientifically invalid and immoral." -- Environmental Information Network (EIN), Inc.
EIN -- A think-tank involved in researching and analyzing hazardous waste and radiotoxic environmental information and issues in order to disseminate technical information for public education.
Environmental Information Network
P.O. Box 280087
Lakewood, CO 80228-0087
pjelofson@aol.com
Paula Elofson-Gardine, Executive Director
Susan Hurst, Publications Director
PLEASE NOTE: EIN is a 501(C)(3) non-profit public education and networking organization that accepts contributions. Permission is granted for copying or transfer of this publication, so long as contact information for EIN is kept intact. The EIN logo is a unique trademark that belongs exclusively to EIN. The EIN logo may not be copied or isolated from EIN publications for use by other organizations or individuals, without specific written permission from the trademark owner, Paula Elofson-Gardine.

This page coded by the ACTION Center. Direct any web-related inquiries to catalyst@actionpa.org.

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: SHERIFF ROBERT HARDWICK'S TRIP TO TRUMP WHITE HOUSE

Here is my e-mail and acknowledgement from SJSO: 

RE: Sheriff Hardwick travel to Washington, D.C.
Aol/Old Mail
  • Shumaker, Ashton 
    From:ashumaker@sjso.org
    To:easlavin@aol.com
    Cc:Mickler, Elizabeth,SO Records
    Mon, May 18 at 2:09 PM

    Your request has been received and will be added to our GovQA portal. Please monitor your email for any updates, invoices, questions, or completion.

     

     

    Stay Safe,

     

    Ashton Shumaker

    Records Specialist | General Services Division 

    ST. JOHNS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE |Robert A. Hardwick, Sheriff

    4015 Lewis Speedway, St. Augustine, FL. 32084

    Office 904.810.6610 | Desk 904.209.1424

     

     

     

     

    From: Mickler, Elizabeth <emickler@sjso.org>
    Sent: Monday, May 18, 2026 1:58 PM
    To: SO Records <sorecords@sjso.org>
    Subject: FW: Sheriff Hardwick travel to Washington, D.C.

     

    Good afternoon! Could someone please add this to GovQA? Thank you!

     

    ELIZABETH MICKLER

    EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE SHERIFF | Office of the Sheriff

     

    ST. JOHNS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE | Robert A. Hardwick, Sheriff

    4015 Lewis Speedway, St. Augustine, Florida. 32084

    Office 904.209.2209 | Cell 904.923.4591

     

     

    From: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
    Sent: Monday, May 18, 2026 1:54 PM
    To: Sheriff, Sheriff <sheriff@sjso.org>; St. Johns County Sheriff Records Department <sjso@govqa.us>; Betty Dixon <bdixon@sjcbcc.mail.onmicrosoft.com>
    Cc: waltbog@nytimes.com; Glenn Silber <gsilber@aol.com>
    Subject: Sheriff Hardwick travel to Washington, D.C.

     

    CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Sheriff's Office. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you believe this message is fraudulent or malicious, please contact SO IT for further assistance by email so_it_group@sjso.org , or phone 904-209-3138.

     

    Dear Sheriff Hardwick:

    Would you please be so kind as to send me PDFs of the documents on your 2026 visits to Washington, D.C.,  including but not limited to invitations, expenses, spreadsheets, reimbursements, invoices, schedules, travel arrangements, notes, correspondence, legislative proposals, trade and law enforcement association meetings etc.? 

    Thank you.

    With kindest regards, I am,

    Sincerely yours,

    Ed Slavin

    Box 3084

    St. Augustine, Florida 32085-3084

    (904) 377-4998


ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: Lamar Alexander Wants Republicans to Stand Up to Trump. (Carl Hulse, NY Times, May 17, 2026)


From The New York Times:

Lamar Alexander Wants Republicans to Stand Up to Trump

Credit...Caroline Gutman for The New York Times
SKIP TO CONTENTSKIP TO SITE INDEX

In a new memoir, the former senator, governor and cabinet member says President Trump committed an impeachable offense on Jan. 6 and calls on Congress to assert its power.

Listen · 6:55 min

Lamar Alexander played a crucial role in short-circuiting the first impeachment trial of President Trump when, as an influential Republican senator from Tennessee, he opposed calling witnesses and said the president’s attempts to pressure Ukraine didn’t meet the test for removal from office.

His role in the second impeachment might have been quite different had he remained in office just a few more weeks.

In his new memoir, “The Education of a Senator,” Mr. Alexander, 85, who is also a former governor, cabinet secretary and presidential candidate, writes with disgust about how the president exhorted the crowd that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and penetrated the Senate chamber in an effort to block certification of the election.

He asserts that the president undermined the Constitution and assaulted the hallowed concept of the peaceful transfer of power.


ImageSenator Lamar Alexander smiles while giving a sideways glance from a booth.
Mr. Alexander at the Capitol on the day of the first impeachment trial of President Trump in February 2020. Credit...Al Drago for The New York Times

But Mr. Alexander had just left office and did not have the chance to weigh in against Mr. Trump, with whom he had an off-again, on-again relationship.

Ever the careful statesman, the ex-senator said in an interview that it would be “self-righteous and disingenuous” for him to declare how he would have voted on the second impeachment when he was not on the jury.

But he does render a verdict on the conduct of his former colleagues as Mr. Trump has steamrolled over a compliant Senate in his second term. He finds them guilty of failing to assert themselves as the Constitution intended.

“To me, the most disappointing difference between the first and second Trump terms was not what Trump did, but what the Senate majority did not do,” Mr. Alexander wrote. “Republican senators rarely checked abuse of presidential authority.”

From Mr. Alexander, those amount to fighting words from an understated, die-hard institutionalist and loyal Republican who spent years running key committees and experienced Washington from both the legislative and executive branch perspectives.

The former senator thinks the current occupants of the Senate could do with a constitutional refresh, and says he knows how he would approach it.

“I think I’d organize a bipartisan breakfast meeting every week of senators, and we would read Article One to each other,” Mr. Alexander said. “Article One says Congress shall be in charge of spending, in charge of taxes, in charge of tariffs, in charge of declaration of war. The least a Senate can do is preserve its constitutional prerogatives.”

Mr. Alexander arrived in the Senate in 2003 with an extraordinary amount of political experience for a freshman. Beginning his Washington career in 1967, he served on the staff of Senator Howard Baker, a revered leader both on Capitol Hill and in Tennessee, and then as an aide in the White House.

Image
Two men in suits speak from behind a panel desk. Senator Russ Feingold’s nameplate is partly out of frame.
Mr. Alexander with Senator Russ Feingold during a hearing in 2003. Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

For a time, he roomed with another ambitious young Republican from the South, Trent Lott of Mississippi, whom he would later join in the Senate. Mr. Lott would also defeat him in a Senate leadership election in 2006 when some colleagues who had committed to Mr. Alexander evidently voted otherwise when they cast secret ballots.

“I will be writing 27 thank-you notes for 24 votes,” Mr. Alexander recounts telling his colleagues after the votes were tallied and he came up short.

Between those early stints in Washington and the Senate, Mr. Alexander had notable success as a two-term Tennessee governor credited with boosting the state’s economy by attracting Japanese automakers. He also served as education secretary in the administration of President George H.W. Bush and mounted two presidential bids in which he drew as much notice for his checkered flannel shirts and the exclamation point after his name in his campaign logo as he did votes. He cut them both short — the campaigns, not the shirts.

His political history, personal connections and expertise in compromise gave him a leg up when he came to the Senate. In a period when many in his party were railing against government, Mr. Alexander saw it as a potential force for good.

“I think the Senate job is a three-term job,” he said. “It took me about midway of my second term to get enough clout and understanding to get things done.”

Mr. Alexander found himself working closely with President Barack Obama, whom he describes as “superior to most presidents in terms of policy but not in human relations,” on major education and health bills.

Mr. Obama also saw Mr. Alexander as someone who could help him on another issue — the stalled Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland — because of his close relationship with Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader who was blocking him. He encouraged Mr. Alexander to intervene.

“It is important that an independent voice like yours be heard,” Mr. Alexander remembers Mr. Obama urging him in a phone call shortly before the 2016 election. “A lot is at stake here.”

A few days later, Mr. Trump was elected, Merrick Garland’s nomination was officially dead and the conservative stamp was soon to be put on the high court.

The lame-duck session following that election did produce a surprise victory for Mr. Alexander, the chairman of the health committee, with the approval of the 21st Century Cures Act, a bipartisan, multibillion-dollar infusion of federal money for health research.

It was signed into law on Dec. 13 by Mr. Obama, who, according to the book, told him that “if it had been just you and me these eight years, everything would have been fine.”

Four years later, that legislation helped provide the means and the money to develop the Covid vaccines under Mr. Trump’s administration, an achievement that many Republicans have come to disdain.

“It puzzles me that he would not take satisfaction and credit for such a great accomplishment,” Mr. Alexander said in the interview.

Mr. Alexander clashed with Mr. Trump on tariffs, trade and spending issues and said that he had seen some recent signs from a few Republican senators of a willingness to challenge the president on those subjects and war powers. But he called for more pushback.

“To put it charitably, senators aren’t realizing the great opportunity they have,” Mr. Alexander said in the interview. “Hold him accountable. Help him come up with a better idea than the one he had. You want the president to succeed, but your oath is not to Trump. Your oath is to the Constitution. You swore that on your first day as a senator. You should follow it.”

Carl Hulse is the chief Washington correspondent for The Times, primarily writing about Congress and national political races and issues. He has nearly four decades of experience reporting in the nation’s capital.





Lamar Alexander Wants Republicans to Stand Up to TrumpLamar Alexander Wants Republicans to Stand Up to Trump