Tuesday, March 31, 2026

ANNALS OF DeSANTISTAN: Sociology no longer a general education course at Florida universities (Jay Waagmeister, WLRN, March 30, 2026

From WLRN:

Sociology no longer a general education course at Florida universities

Students at the University of Florida Warrington College of Business.
(Photo Courtesy University Of Florida)
Students at the University of Florida Warrington College of Business. 

The board governing Florida’s universities voted Thursday to remove sociology as a general education offering at the state’s public universities, leaving it available as an elective course.

The decision, while not on the agenda for the meeting at University of West Florida, comes after state rulemakers and faculty tugged back and forth over what a sociology curriculum will look like.

The motion eliminates 1000- and 2000-level sociology courses from the general education list for the 2026-2027 school year, meaning the courses no longer contribute to general education graduation requirements.

State lawmakers in recent years attacked certain concepts, putting in law that it is illegal to “distort significant historical events or include curriculum that teaches identity politics” in general education courses. Chief among the classes of lawmakers’ concerns were sociology, which commonly teaches about race, gender, and sexuality.

‘Viewpoint-discriminatory’ higher education law heard for preliminary injunction

State University System Chancellor Ray Rodrigues took issue with the approach of the American Sociological Association, saying its “mission goes beyond understanding society, and now extends to its transformation. Sociology as a discipline is now social and political advocacy dressed in the regalia of the academy.”

The University of North Florida, Florida Gulf Coast University, Florida A&M University, and University of South Florida asked the chancellor to remove Intro to Sociology from their respective general education lists.

Rodrigues one-upped that and moved for all institutions to remove sociology as a general education offering.

The courses are still available as electives. However, as professors have argued before, removal from general education reduces enrollment, giving more stable ground for a university to discontinue courses, majors, or departments.

“The path to preserve academic freedom and preserve compliance with Florida statutes is clear. Remove Sociology 1000 and 2000 courses from all general education classifications. Leave these courses as electives, free to compete in the marketplace of ideas, and leave them as the majors and the minors for the students who choose to study them,” Rodrigues said.

READ MORE: Chapters deleted, sections added: Florida's new sociology textbook is 'stop-gap,' says professor

The faculty member of the board of governors, Kimberly Dunn, an accounting professor from Florida Atlantic University, did not agree with her colleagues.

“In light of these good-faith efforts and the many programs prepared to implement this work in compliance with state law, removal may be premature and broader than necessary,” Dunn said.

“Maintaining sociology on the general education list preserves discipline, evidence-based inquiry into critically important aspects of the human experience,” Dunn said.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.SUBSCRIBE
Background
The state recently developed, through a workgroup, its own sociology curriculum that complies with state law.

Inside Higher Ed reported that the state produced a “heavily edited version of an open-source sociology textbook.” The formulation of the curriculum was controversial, including Kamoutsas’ removal of a professor from the workgroup, the Miami Herald reported.

Professors from around the state took issue with that textbook, saying it omits core concepts of the discipline and is “sanitized.”

“I’ve listened carefully,” Rodrigues said of faculty members who have disagreed with sociology changes. He then read off comments from professors complaining the state curriculum infringes on the profession and represents “a really impoverished version of our discipline.”

“Today’s ASA norms are a clear rejection of the wisdom of sociology’s founders. These challenges do appear isolated to sociology. My staff and I have not seen any of these issues in other disciplines like history or political science. The media has framed a false choice before the board today — that you either violate academic freedom and comply with state statute or you can violate state statute and comply with academic freedom,” Rodrigues said.

Former Education Commissioner and now University of West Florida President Manny Diaz Jr. said in 2023, “Sociology has been hijacked by left-wing activists.”

Reducing credit hours?In another graduation-related discussion, board members began preliminary discussions about programs that require 90 credit hours to graduate as opposed to 120.

With a goal of shortening time to completion, reducing student costs, and supporting faster workforce entry, governors and university presidents talked pros and cons of reducing credit hours for certain programs.

Florida is considering following the lead of other states pursuing similar ideas, including Arizona, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Ohio, and Utah.

In an anticipated timeline presented to the board, university system administrators said students could enroll in the programs as soon as Fall 2027, but program formulation must first begin.

Currently, bachelor’s degrees require at least 120 credit hours, unless approved by the board.

“These degrees are really great ways to respond to industry changes but the program learning outcomes must be designed in partnership with the industries so that the students have the chance for employment opportunities,” Florida Gulf Coast University President Aysegul Timur said.

The University of Florida will not institute the program, interim President Donald Landry said. FSU President Richard McCullough said his school is “not really pursuing this.”

Florida International University President Jeanette Nuñez said her school would explore the possibility.

USF President Moez Limayem wondered how lower credit hours would affect students seeking entry to graduate school.

FAMU President Marva Johnson suggested 90 credit hours could be useful for nontraditional students, such as ones exiting the military.

Levine said such a change “translates into more throughput and being able to get more students from our state into our universities,” noting rising applications to Florida’s institutions and the Florida House’s attempt this session to increase the proportion of Florida students as opposed to out-of-staters.

“I would encourage you to consider this as part of a solution to a much larger problem of access for our Florida students,” Levine said.

Governor Carson Good said he worries about “deteriorating the brand” of Florida’s schools. “Employers talk,” he said.

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.


Tags

EDGEHILL VENTURES, LLC. (Bizapedia)

xxxx 

Companies Named Edgehill Ventures LLC (Nationwide)

We found 5 companies that have an entity name matching Edgehill Ventures LLC.
EDGEHILL VENTURES LLC • GEORGIA
ENTITY TYPE
Domestic Limited-Liability Company
FILING STATUS
ACTIVE/COMPLIANCE
FILING JURISDICTION
Georgia
FILING DATE
September 7, 2021
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
768 Brookwood Drive 
Forest Park, GA 30297
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS
768 Brookwood Drive 
Forest Park, GA 30297
REGISTERED AGENT
John Browning William
EDGEHILL VENTURES LLC • NEW JERSEY
ENTITY TYPE
Domestic Limited-Liability Company
FILING STATUS
ACTIVE
FILING JURISDICTION
New Jersey
FILING DATE
January 13, 2021
MAILING ADDRESS
2 Edgehill Court 
West Orange, NJ 07052
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS
2 Edgehill Court 
West Orange, NJ 07052
REGISTERED AGENT
Edgehill Ventures LLC
EDGEHILL VENTURES LLC • PENNSYLVANIA
ENTITY TYPE
Foreign Limited-Liability Company
FILING STATUS
ACTIVE
FILING JURISDICTION
Pennsylvania
FILING DATE
April 18, 2019
REGISTERED AGENT
National Registered Agents, Inc.
EDGEHILL VENTURES LLC • TENNESSEE
ENTITY TYPE
Domestic Limited-Liability Company
FILING STATUS
ACTIVE
FILING JURISDICTION
Tennessee
FILING DATE
November 30, 2018
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
1201 16th Ave S 
Nashville, TN 37212-2901
MAILING ADDRESS
1201 16th Ave S 
Nashville, TN 37212-2901
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS
1201 16th Ave S 
Nashville, TN 37212-2901
REGISTERED AGENT
John Ryan Tyrrell
EDGEHILL VENTURES LLC • VIRGINIA
ENTITY TYPE
Domestic Limited-Liability Company
FILING STATUS
ACTIVE
FILING JURISDICTION
Virginia
FILING DATE
May 14, 2020
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
605 Edgehill Rd 
Richmond, VA 23222-3509
REGISTERED AGENT ADDRESS
605 Edge Hill Rd 
Richmond, VA 23222-3509
REGISTERED AGENT
Wanda D Stallings
The information on this page is being provided for the purpose of informing the public about a matter of genuine public interest.

ANNALS OF DeSANTISTAN: The ‘Blue Ribbon’ Projects bill died this session. Will it come back? (Mitch Perry, Florida Phoenix, March 31, 20260

From Florida Phoenix:

The ‘Blue Ribbon’ Projects bill died this session. Will it come back?

Supporters say it’s an innovative way to deal with the state’s housing needs. Critics said its passage would lead to disaster for decades to come.

BY: -MARCH 31, 2026 12:05 AM

 St. Johns County forest trail via St. Johns County

A proposal to spur intense development in some of the most rural areas of the state died in the final days of the regular legislative session, due largely to strong opposition from Republican senators who declared that their constituents didn’t want any part of it.

While its critics cheered the idea’s failure, they remain concerned it will be revived next year.

The bill (SB 354) would have established so-called “Blue Ribbon” projects for landowners who control 15,000 or more contiguous acres. That’s comparable in size to the Broward County City of Weston, and would apply only to a select number of landowners in the state.

It would require that 60% of that land be set aside as “reserve areas” and the remainder developed over 50 years into cities and towns regardless of the underlying comprehensive planning and land use allocations.

As initially proposed, there would have been no opportunity for the public to weigh in — language that prompted fierce pushback. The bill was amended to require the local government to conduct two public hearings. The local county commission could deny the project if it determined the plan was “substantially inconsistent” with the existing comprehensive plan.

Advocates hailed the proposal as an innovative way to add affordable housing in a state starved of it, but it was scorned by residents from rural areas who complained it would pave their parts of the state in contempt of established planning by local governments.

Sponsoring the measure in the House (HB 299) was Rep. Lauren Melo, R-Naples. Referring to the state’s severe housing shortage and affordability crisis, she asserted her bill offered an “innovative” approach for “unique properties that demand a unique approach.” And in her introduction to the legislation in its first committee stop last December, she slammed citizens who claim the existing growth management system in the state is working.

“Members, Florida deserves better than knee-jerk obstructionism,” Melo declared.

Her bill ultimately passed through all three of its assigned committees with minimal criticism from her House colleagues, but it never made it to the floor for a vote.

The Senate companion (SB 354), sponsored by Stan McClain, R-Ocala, actually did reach the floor, where it was temporarily postponed when it became apparent it lacked the votes for passage.

The measure could have been killed much earlier in the process by Sen. Kathleen Passidomo, R-Naples, who told her colleagues and the public that initially she was “not inclined” to give it a hearing in the Rules Committee, which she chaired. She changed her mind, she said, after being persuaded by colleagues to give it a shot.

The bill narrowly passed in the Senate Rules Committee on a 12-10 vote, with GOP Sens. Jennifer Bradley of Fleming Island and Corey Simon of Tallahassee both noting their constituents strongly opposed it. Passidomo observed on a couple of occasions that it “wasn’t a bad concept,” but as written lacked detailed information about concurrency, mobility, and other necessary requirements to assure sufficient public facilities and services necessary to support a development.

And Passidomo seconded what many other critics cited about the bill’s definition of what qualified as a “recreation area” — that it would allow utilities to be placed in those conservation areas.

“That makes no sense,” she said. “You want a nuclear power plant or wastewater treatment plant in a conservation area? This bill would allow that.”

Bradley scoffed at the notion that the bill would prove an antidote to overdevelopment.

“Local communities want to be able to plan their way of life,” she said. “They want to control the vision for their communities. They don’t want their communities governed by a hedge fund.”

Financial contributions

Seeking Rents reporter Jason Garcia wrote in January that Ruane Cuniff, a New York investment firm, was behind the proposal. He also reported that entities associated with that group had showered financial contributions upon various state elected officials, including $10,000 each to political committees controlled by Melo and McClain.

The Phoenix reached out to both Melo and McClain’s offices for comment. McClain did not respond and Melo’s office said the representative “could not respond to this inquiry at this time.”

The definition of what would constitute recreation areas in the bill was a trigger for many. It included pickleball or basketball courts and other sports facilities that could prove inimical to the conservation reserves, as well as retention ponds and utility sites. The bill was later amended to explicitly say that the reserve areas could not include golf courses, data centers, or solar farms.

The incoming Senate President, Jim Boyd-R, Bradenton, told the Phoenix earlier this month that he thinks “it’s a good initiative.”

“Obviously, there were some challenges that were illuminated along the way, and there’s some tweaks that [McClain] can make that I think can make it better,” he said following a bill signing ceremony by Gov. DeSantis at Pier 22 in Bradenton.

“For rural communities, maybe not all of them, but some rural communities, that could be a grand slam for them. I know the area that was proposed for this particular project. They were very excited about it in that area. If you do something statewide, there’s other attendant factors you have to address, and we will, but I believe it will come back and, hopefully, it will be a better product next year.”

Residents from St. John’s and Clay County in Northeast Florida trekked to Tallahassee to complain the lands being groomed for Blue Ribbon projects were in their communities, but that they wanted no part of it.

Affordable housing component

Regarding housing, the bill said a maximum residential density of 12 units per gross acre would be “permitted” within the development area, with at least 20% of any housing built on the project designated as affordable “missing middle” housing for people eligible for the Florida Hometown Hero Program.

But would anyone want to live there?

Clay County Commissioner Betsy Condon (via Clay County government website)

“I could get behind that if any of this land was where people that need housing actually are going to live,” said Clay County Commissioner Betsy Condon.

“I have kids in their 20s and they don’t want to live in the middle of a timber forest, whether it’s an apartment or not. They want to be close to things that they want to go do. This is a utopian concept where you live, work, and play together. I have trouble buying that there would be people who would want to go where you’re 30 minutes from any grocery store, and now are the businesses going to go there? Are you going to have enough going on in the area where businesses are going to want to locate there?”

Beth Alvi of Audubon Florida agreed, saying the bill lacked “the specificity that is required for something this large and with this many giveaways. And what you say could be protected today could be moved, could be reduced, could be reconfigured tomorrow in the way that the bill is written.”

St. Petersburg Democratic Rep. Lindsay Cross, an environmentalist scientist, voted for the bill during one of its committee stops. But she says she only did so because she wanted to be able to add amendments before it went to the House floor, such as adding teeth to the definition of conservation areas.

State Rep. Lindsay Cross (Photo via Florida House)

“I would have liked to have seen the areas of public benefit decoupled from the conservation areas, because I don’t think stormwater retention or utilities — that’s not true conservation. So, I don’t think that should have been included in that 60%.”

Additionally, Blue Ribbon projects would not be required to demonstrate need based on projected population growth or any other basis. That was a problem, Cross insists.

“That was very troubling to me, because you know that this could be something that just pops up in the middle of nowhere and there’s going to have to be a lot of new infrastructure, whether its roads or water, electricity, to support that community. And often that does fall on existing taxpayers and residents and businesses for that infrastructure investment.”

Broader question

During the Rules Committee’s final meeting, Passidomo said that although she didn’t believe the proposal was ready for primetime, the way the state regulates land use needs to be reviewed. She noted that over the past decade, the Legislature has been pressured to push preemption bills to appease developers because of accusations that local governments have rejected, slow walked, or thrown up roadblocks to economic development.

“Our state desperately needs to shift away from piecemeal changes to local and state development laws,” Passidomo said.

Julianne Thomas, senior environmental planning specialist with the Conservancy of Southwest Florida, argued for recognition that ever since Rick Scott became governor in 2011, the planning process “has significantly changed and has significantly been more pro-development.” It’s more the exception than the rule that county commissions are denying or slow walking development projects, she said, noting how the state planning process is actually controlled the Florida Department of Commerce.

In Scott’s first year in office, the Department of Community Affairs, the state agency that typically would have evaluated “Blue Ribbon”-type projects was eliminated, giving the power to local governments to approve or deny such projects.

“I think that having an agency that had oversight over these big DRIs (Development of Regional Impact) and sector plans and other things to look for consistency and all of that is no longer there,” Alvi said. It makes one question the point of Florida Chapter 163, specifically Part II, the Community Planning Act, which governs local comprehensive planning, land development regulations, and growth policy, she said.

“I think there’s value in sitting down and evaluating what’s in [Chapter] 163 and seeing how does it fit in with Florida’s current growth and how things have been changing and how we can best fix that so that we continue in a sustainable way,” she said.

If the bill does come back in a future legislative session, Thomas said, state lawmakers need to understand the implications of allowing such developments to be green-lit outside the comprehensive planning process.

“I think before we make such a dramatic change in approving things top down instead of bottom up, there needs to be some discussion and understanding of why we’re doing that. What’s the ultimate purpose and goals for doing that, and not just think that by changing the rules a little bit we’re going to suddenly solve the affordable housing crisis, because it’s simply not that simple.”

Independent Journalism for All

As a nonprofit newsroom, our articles are free for everyone to access. Readers like you make that possible. Can you help sustain our watchdog reporting today?

Creative Commons License

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. AP and Getty images may not be republished. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of any other photos and graphics.

Mitch Perry
MITCH PERRY

Mitch Perry has covered politics and government in Florida for more than two decades. Most recently he is the former politics reporter for Bay News 9. He has also worked at Florida Politics, Creative Loafing and WMNF Radio in Tampa. He was also part of the original staff when the Florida Phoenix was created in 2018.

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

Monday, March 30, 2026

Nashville, Tenn. Real estate developer charged with sexual battery in St. Augustine. (Hoodline, WZTV Nashville)

On November 22, 2025, JOHN RYAN TYRRELL, 51, a real estate developer from Nashville Tennesssee allegedly committed sexual battery, a felony, upon a drugged or drunk woman in the historic area of St. Augustine. 

Felony charges are pending in Circuit Court, where Judge Christopher Ferrebee set a $2 million bond and confirmed Defendant to his $2.2 million Nashville mansion without advance court permission, requiring Defendant to return immediately to Nashville upon his release from St. Johns County Jail.

 Defendant JOHN. RYAN TYRRELL of EDGEHILL VENTURES LLC of  Tennessee, Georgia, New Jersey and Virginia is charged under Florida Statute 794.011 with sexual battery upon a helpless person.

TYRRELL and a friend allegedly checked out of their short-term rental two days earlier, returning to Nashville. 

TYRREKLL is represented by lawyer Henry Coxe, III, prominent Jacksonville criminal defense lawyer.   Prosecution by Assistant State's Attorney Monica V. Smith.


Pioneer Technology Group
Click LINKS below for Registration Forms and Calendar Instructions


blank
Judge:
FEREBEE, CHRISTOPHER S 
Case Number:
26000310CFMA 
Clerk File Date:
3/3/2026 
Total Fees Due:
0.00 
Agency Report Number:
26060330A03 
Court Type:
Criminal Felony 
Uniform Case Number:
552026CF000310XXAXMX 
Status Date:
3/3/2026  
Custody Location:
COUNTY JAIL 
Case Type:
 
Status:
OPEN  
Waive Speedy Trial:
Agency:
STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 
TYPEPARTY NAMEATTORNEY
DEFENDANT 
Active COXE, HENRY M III
PLAINTIFF 
STATE OF FLORIDA
Active SMITH, MONICA V (Main Attorney)
0
COUNTDESCRIPTIONLEVELDEGREEPLEADISPOSITIONDISPOSITION DATE
SEXUAL BATTERY ON A HELPLESS PERSON (794.011 4be1)     
DATEEVENTJUDGELOCATIONRESULT
3/23/2026 3:00 PM FELONY HEARING FEREBEE, CHRISTOPHER S Courtroom 328 COMPLETED  
3/12/2026 2:30 PM FELONY HEARING FEREBEE, CHRISTOPHER S Courtroom 328 CONTINUED  
SEQ#IMAGEDINDATEENTRY
37  36 3/25/2026ORDER ON STATE'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION 
36  37 3/24/2026EVIDENCE CHANGE OF CUSTODY 
35  35 3/23/2026EVIDENCE LIST 
33  33 3/23/2026HEARING NOTES 
32  31 3/23/2026EVIDENCE LIST 
31  30 3/23/2026DEFENDANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO STATE'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION 
30   29 3/23/2026PROSECUTOR: SMITH, MONICA V ASSIGNED 
29  28 3/23/2026DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WITNESS TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY 
28  27 3/23/2026ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WITNESSES TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY 
27  26 3/18/2026ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF CREDIT RECORDS 
26  25 3/18/2026STATE'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR PRODUCTION OF CREDIT RECORDS 
25  24 3/18/2026NOTICE OF DISCOVERY 
24  23 3/13/2026DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES PURSUANT TO RULE 2.516 
23  22 3/13/2026NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 
22  21 3/12/2026CORRECTED HEARING NOTES 
21  20 3/12/2026ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WITNESS TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY 
20  19 3/12/2026HEARING NOTES 
19  18 3/12/2026ACKNOWLEDGMENT FILED 
18   17 3/12/2026FELONY HEARING SET FOR 03/23/2026 AT 3:00 PM IN 328/ , JDG: FEREBEE, CHRISTOPHER S 
17  16 3/12/2026DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR WITNESS TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY 
16 26  15 3/12/2026DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO STATE'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION 
15  14 3/12/2026STATE'S MOTION FOR WITNESS TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY 
14  13 3/12/2026ORDER ON STATE'S MOTION FOR WITNESS TO APPEAR VIRTUALLY 
13  12 3/9/2026NOTICE OF HEARING 
12   11 3/9/2026FELONY HEARING SET FOR 03/12/2026 AT 2:30 PM IN 328/ , JDG: FEREBEE, CHRISTOPHER S 
11  10 3/9/2026PRE-TRIAL RELEASE NO CONTACT ORDER 
10  3/6/2026STATE'S MOTION FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION 
 3/6/2026FIRST APPEARANCE FORM 
  32 3/5/2026ARREST COUNT: 1 - (794.011 4BE1) SEXUAL BATTERY ON A HELPLESS PERSON 
 3/5/2026WARRANT FOR ARREST EXECUTED ON 3/5/2026 BY ST JOHNS COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE 
  3/3/2026WARRANT FOR ARREST STATUS SET TO SENT TO SHERIFF ON 03/03/2026 
 3/3/2026WARRANT FOR ARREST ISSUED FOR SWORN COMPLAINT FILED 
  3/3/2026SWORN COMPLAINT COUNT: 1 - (794.011 4BE1) SEXUAL BATTERY ON A HELPLESS PERSON 
  3/3/2026PROSECUTOR: OFFICE, STATE ATTORNEY'S ASSIGNED 
  3/3/2026JUDGE FEREBEE, CHRISTOPHER S: ASSIGNED 
  3/3/2026CASE FILED 03/03/2026 CASE NUMBER 26000310CFMA 
blank