In secret, behind locked gates, our Nation's Oldest City dumped a landfill in a lake (Old City Reservoir), while emitting sewage in our rivers and salt marsh. Organized citizens exposed and defeated pollution, racism and cronyism. We elected a new Mayor. We're transforming our City -- advanced citizenship. Ask questions. Make disclosures. Demand answers. Be involved. Expect democracy. Report and expose corruption. Smile! Help enact a St. Augustine National Park and Seashore. We shall overcome!
Update April 12, 2025: We were blessed that the late Judge John Noonan was appointed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by President Ronald Wilson Reagan. Judge Noonan wrote one of my favorite books on bribery -- to this day it influences my investigative reporting and writing. It is required reading for anyone who wants to understand the corrupt political regime in Florida, where St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners voted 3-2 to approve an indecent and corrupt demand to name a secretive corporate law firm co-owned by the Florida House Speaker-designate as our County Attorney! This stinks. Having read Judge John Noonan's book. I have exposed and investigated bribe-payers and bribe-takers including the late corrupt Democratic Anderson County (Tenn.) Sheriff Dennis Owen Trotter and St. Johns County Commission Chair Thomas Manuel.
I know about bribery. I've studied bribery. I've seen the results.
The night before the late Anderson County Sheriff Dennis Owen Trotter was arrested in 1984, I took a bus from Memphis to Knoxville.
The next day, accompanied by Ernest F. Phillips, my late Publisher, DA's Criminal Investigator and County Commissioner, got to see bribe-taking Sheriff Dennis Trotter arrested by the FBI.
Ernie had three photographers to record the event for history, including two ex-deputies.
Flash forward to 2008: On the night that he was arrested by the FBI, I telephoned my friend Tom Manuel and said, "Don't do that again."
To current County Commissioners, I suggest that that every single one of those Dull Republicans might wish to contemplate the case of United States of America v. Thomas G. Manuel.
As Jack Ryan, a character in Tom Clancy novels, once said to a corrupt foreign leader whose bribery was revealed by CIA surveillance in his government airplane, "We know about your retirement plan,"
And as I said to SJC BoCC Chair Tom Manuel the night of his arrest, "Don't do that again."
Don't mess with our rights to open honest transparent government.
There are more good people than bad people in St. Johns County.
The whole world is watchin'.
----
The late Judge John Noonan of the Ninth Circuit wrote a wonderful book on bribery. It would make excellent holiday gift. Judge Noonan, appointed by President Reagan, was a wonderful scholar who also wrote a book on Eleventh Amendment state sovereign immunity. From December 22, 1984 New York Times:
My blog post from December 16, 2022:
Books of The Times; The Ageless Bribe
By D.JR. Bruckner
BRIBES. By John T. Noonan Jr. 839 pages. Macmillan. $29.95.
It stinks,'' said a Federal judge presiding at the bribery trial of a member of the House of Representatives caught in an Abscam sting. The reader of John T. Noonan's study of bribes will certainly get a noseful. In but a few of his 839 pages he mentions 43 mayors, 44 judges, 60 legislators and 260 sheriffs and policemen indicted for corruption in the 1970's, not to mention four governors and former Vice President Spiro T. Agnew, who once advised a contractor who was being asked for a Nixon-Agnew campaign contribution: ''Tell them you gave at the office.'' His office. Mr. Agnew had a point. Between a campaign contribution and a bribe, Senator Russell Long said, there is ''almost a hair's line of difference.''
It all started with religion. Mr. Noonan points out that in the Old Testament there are rules about sacrifices clearly meant to warn people that God does not take bribes. But the word ''redemption,'' he points out, meant that Christ had bought back mankind from damnation. That notion has a bearing on the 1,000-year struggle of the church to justify offerings to clergy while avoiding the charge of condoning simony - the sin named for Simon Magus who had offered money to St. Peter in return for instruction on how to gain spiritual powers. It was a dispute over simony, after all, that began the Protestant Reformation.
The church had not only the Bible to draw on for its debates, but also Roman sources, such as the great indictment speeches given by Cicero against Ver res, who seems to have been bribed by everyone in Sicily and to have bribed half the officials of the whole republic. Mr. Noonan has great fun with this lurid history, as he does with the trials of Francis Bacon in the 17th century and Warren Hastings in the 18th.
Bacon, who was a philosopher, took enormous bribes while he was Chancellor of England, and Hastings, if one believes Edmund Burke's indictment of him, was on the take from virtually everyone who wanted government favors while he was running India. Mr. Noonan, who is both a philosopher and a lawyer, pursues these histories like a good cross-examiner with a sense of irony.
But he is also a patriot; American bribery occupies most of his book. From the beginning, we have not been pikers. The framers of the Constitution fretted that a President might bribe people to increase his power and specified bribery as a reason for impeachment. But the states got down to it first. In the Yazoo land scheme in 1795, the Georgia Legislature handed out 35 million acres for almost nothing to a bunch of speculators, the legislators - and officials in other states - getting a fair chunk for themselves. Eventually the whole scheme was paid for by the Federal Government, with the approval of the Supreme Court.
Congress had its own flings. When the Union Pacific Railroad was laid down, stock was passed around to many members of the House by one of their own who was in cahoots with the builders to get vast Federal support for the project. It seems that almost every Republican in Washington with any power, including the Vice President, was hooked.
Small wonder that people like Mark Twain and Henry Adams became enormously popular for novels in which bribery ruled the rulers of the nation, or that later, Lincoln Steffens built a great reputation by simply bringing together into one volume what local papers had long reported about graft in the cities. Steffens, of course, eventually resigned his role as moralist; ''we all do it,'' he said. He may have been right. Mr. Noonan gives a wonderful account of a San Francisco newspaper that scourged public officials for being on the take while the paper itself was on a retainer from the Southern Pacific Railroad.
Ironically, with all this evidence at hand, it was in this century that universities seem to have lost interest in the subject. Mr. Noonan's account of the decline of thought on the subject in law schools, divinity schools and among social scientists and psychoanalysts makes one wonder whether these savants know much about human conduct - or want to know.
The Watergate prosecutions and Abscam operations give Mr. Noonan an opportunity to raise some not very evident questions about how puritanical we ought to be about bribery, and his analysis of the political fund used for many years by the Gulf Oil Company leads to some inspired speculation about the whole business of political campaigns. But perhaps his richest speculations about morality come in his account of Lockheed's payments to officials in many countries, including Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and a prime minister of Japan. ''I received One Hundred Peanuts'' read the receipt signed by one of the prime minister's contacts. Some peanuts. Altogether Lockheed had paid about $12 million to Tokyo officialdom.
Mr. Noonan is a fine writer and a shrewd moralist. He teaches but he also entertains. His vast learning (the 98 pages of notes reflect whole libraries of sources) is evident but gracefully used. There is scarcely a page in this huge book that does not raise an interesting question or make one redefine one's notions of the morality of public conduct. This treasure can be dipped into many times without being exhausted.
That's what Senior U.S. District court Judge Timothy J, corrigan found about Joseph McAnarney Non-Party Subpoena, demanded by
Controversial "Agrihood" Developer Robinson Improvement Company's lawyers -- Defeated Former St. Johns County CommissionerJEREMIAH RAY BLOCKER, Who Earned A University Of Miami Master Of Laws In "Real Estate Development" & ZACHARY WATSON MILLER (Scion-Son Of Robinson Improvement Company's Special Magistrate Hearing Witness, England-Thimms & Miller Founder Douglas Miller).
From St. Johns Citizen:
Federal Judge Rules On Developer’s Push To Subpoena St. Johns County ‘Agrihood’ Critic
Attorney Zach Miller, left, and retired architect Joe McAnarney, right.
A federal judge last month sided with a St. Johns County resident who sought to block a subpoena tied to the “Agrihood” development lawsuit, finding the request too broad.
In a March 10 order, U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Corrigan granted non-party Joseph McAnarney’s motion to quash a subpoena issued by attorneys for Robinson Improvement Company, which is suing St. Johns County Board of County Commissioners over a denied rezoning application.
McAnarney, a retired architect who spoke publicly against the proposed development, had been asked to turn over wide-ranging communications, including emails, messages and other records related to his opposition.
The battle over a 3,300 home development conitnues.
“The Court is wary of requiring a non-party citizen to become embroiled in a dispute between plaintiff and St. Johns County,” Corrigan wrote, according to court paperts.
The judge also determined the subpoena was overbroad, pointing to its sweeping demand for personal communications.
Instead, the order directs the plaintiff to seek relevant information through the county during discovery, including any documents McAnarney may have provided or whether officials relied on his input.
At the same time, the ruling leaves open the possibility that McAnarney could be required to provide testimony or records later.
The motion to quash was granted without prejudice, allowing the developer to revisit the issue if it can show the information is necessary.
A red barn which is part of Freehold Communities ‘Agrihood’ Arden development in Palm Beach County, Florida. A similar project is proposed for St. Johns County. (Freehold Communities)
The order also signals caution regarding similar subpoenas issued to other residents who received subpoenas after speaking at public meetings.
The court indicated that the same concerns about scope and burden apply to those efforts.
Several of the recipients said they were served on Christmas Eve, while Agrihood lawyers said the timing was accidental.
The dispute stems from a federal lawsuit filed by Robinson Improvement Company, which argues the county wrongly denied its rezoning request despite clear long-range planning policies supporting residential development.
A status conference in the case is scheduled for April 15 at the federal courthouse in Jacksonville.
This case is before the Court on non-party Joseph McAnarney’s Motion to
Quash Subpoena (Doc. 17) to which plaintiff has responded in opposition (Doc.
18).
The Court is wary of requiring a non-party citizen to become embroiled in
a dispute between plaintiff and St. Johns County. In addition, the subpoena is
overbroad. During discovery, plaintiff may inquire of St. Johns County
concerning Mr. McAnarney’s involvement, including documents he may have
provided to the County, conversations he may have had with County officials
and Board members, to what extent the County relied on Mr. McAnarney’s
testimony in its decision-making, etc. If it becomes clear later that Mr.
McAnarney’s testimony or production is necessary, plaintiff, after conferring
with Mr. McAnarney’s counsel, can seek relief. But for now, non-party JosephCase 3:25-cv-01275-TJC-LLL Document 21 Filed 03/10/26 Page 2 of 3 PageID 407
McAnarney’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (Doc. 17) is granted without
prejudice to plaintiff renewing its efforts to seek production or testimony from
Mr. McAnarney at a later stage.
Further, while the Court resolved on other grounds similar motions filed
by two other non-parties appearing pro se, to the extent those non-parties have
not yet responded to their subpoenas, the Court expects plaintiff to heed this
ruling with regard to them, as well as with regard to any additional non-party
citizens from whom plaintiff intends to seek discovery until the Court can
discuss it with the parties.
Finally, this case is SET for a status conference before the undersigned
on APRIL 15, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 10D, Bryan Simpson United
States Courthouse, 300 North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida.1
DONE AND ORDERED in Jacksonville, Florida this 10th day of March,
2026.
1 All persons entering the Courthouse must present photo identification to
Court Security Officers. Although cell phones, laptop computers, and similar
electronic devices generally are not permitted in the building, attorneys may bring
those items with them to the extent permitted by Local Rule 7.02.
