Wednesday, April 22, 2026

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: Navy Secretary Is Fired as Infighting Roils Pentagon (Greg Jaffe, Eric Schmitt & Helene Cooper, NY Times, April 22, 2026)

From New York Times:

Navy Secretary Is Fired as Infighting Roils Pentagon

John Phelan is leaving the Pentagon after months of tension with Pete Hegseth and other Pentagon leaders. The tumult comes as the Navy has been engaged in war with Iran.

Secretary of the Navy John Phelan championed a major investment in new ships including a “Trump-class” battleship, but his superiors were dissatisfied with his handling of the initiative.Credit...Eric Lee for The New York Times

Navy Secretary John Phelan was fired on Wednesday after months of infighting with senior Pentagon leaders and disagreements over how to revive the Navy’s struggling shipbuilding program.

Mr. Phelan is leaving the Pentagon and the Trump administration effective immediately, wrote Sean Parnell, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman, in a terse statement.

In his role leading the Navy, Mr. Phelan had championed the “Golden Fleet,” a major investment in new ships including a “Trump-class” battleship. But Mr. Phelan’s leadership was marred by feuds with senior leaders in the Pentagon, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, Pentagon and congressional officials said.

Mr. Phelan is the first service secretary to leave the administration, though he is the second one to clash with the defense secretary. Mr. Hegseth also has butted heads with Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll over promotions and a host of other issues. Mr. Hegseth fired the Army’s chief of staff, Gen. Randy George, earlier this month.

The Navy secretary has no role overseeing deployed forces, and Mr. Phelan’s firing is not likely to have significant implications for the conduct of the Iran war or U.S. Navy operations to blockade Iranian ports or open the Strait of Hormuz. As the Navy’s top civilian leader, his main responsibility is to oversee the building of the future naval and Marine Corps force.

But the tumult could make it harder for the Navy to replenish its stock of Tomahawk missiles and high-end air defense systems, which have been in heavy use in Iran.

Tensions had been simmering for months between Mr. Phelan and his two bosses — Mr. Hegseth and Mr. Feinberg — over management style, personnel issues and other matters.

Mr. Feinberg, in particular, had grown increasingly dissatisfied with Mr. Phelan’s handling of the Navy’s major new shipbuilding initiative, and had been siphoning off responsibility for the project from him, said the congressional official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss personnel matters.

Mr. Phelan, a White House appointee, also had a contentious relationship with his deputy, Under Secretary Hung Cao, who is more aligned with Mr. Hegseth, especially on some of the social and cultural battles that have defined the defense secretary’s tenure, the officials said.

A senior administration official said that Mr. Hegseth informed Mr. Phelan before the Pentagon’s official announcement that he and President Trump had decided that the Navy needed new leadership.

A spokeswoman for Mr. Phelan referred all questions on Wednesday evening to the Defense Department.

Last fall, Mr. Hegseth fired Mr. Phelan’s chief of staff, Jon Harrison, who had clashed with senior officials throughout the Pentagon. The unusual move highlighted the broader tensions between Mr. Hegseth and Mr. Phelan.

Still, the timing of Mr. Phelan’s firing caught some Pentagon and congressional officials off guard. On Wednesday, Mr. Phelan was making the rounds on Capitol Hill, talking to senators about his upcoming annual hearing with lawmakers to discuss the Navy’s budget request and other priorities.

“Secretary Phelan’s abrupt dismissal is troubling,” Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said in a statement Wednesday night. “In the midst of President Trump’s war of choice in Iran, at a moment when our naval forces are stretched thin across multiple theaters, this kind of disruption at the top sends the wrong signal to our sailors and Marines, to our allies, and to our adversaries.”

Mr. Phelan also had a close relationship with Mr. Trump. In December, Mr. Phelan appeared alongside Mr. Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort to announce the “Golden Fleet” and the new class of battleships bearing Mr. Trump’s name.

“John Phelan is one of the most successful businessmen in the country — in our country,” Mr. Trump said. “He’s been a tremendous success.”

Before joining the Trump administration, Mr. Phelan ran a private investment fund based in Florida. 

“He’s taken probably the largest salary cut in history, but he wanted to do it,” Mr. Trump said at the December press conference. “He wants to rebuild our Navy. And you needed that kind of a brain to do it properly.”

But Mr. Trump’s effusive praise masked deeper tensions with Mr. Phelan’s Pentagon bosses.

Bryan Clark, a naval analyst at the Hudson Institute, said that Mr. Phelan was “driving the Navy in a different direction” than what Mr. Hegseth and Mr. Feinberg wanted.

“He was championing initiatives like the battleship and frigate that don’t align with where the D.O.W. leadership is taking the military, which is toward submarines, stealth aircraft, unmanned systems and software-driven capabilities like electronic warfare and cyber,” Mr. Clark said in an email, using the abbreviation for Department of War, as the administration calls the Defense Department.

Mr. Phelan also clashed with Mr. Hegseth over personnel issues in the Navy and Marine Corps, a former senior military official said. Mr. Hegseth has directed service secretaries to scrub the social media accounts of general- and admiral-level promotion candidates to ensure they are not deemed too “woke” by Mr. Hegseth’s standards, the official said.


Maggie Haberman and Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.

Greg Jaffe covers the Pentagon and the U.S. military for The Times.

Eric Schmitt is a national security correspondent for The Times. He has reported on U.S. military affairs and counterterrorism for more than three decades.

Helene Cooper is a Pentagon correspondent for The Times. She was previously an editor, diplomatic correspondent and White House correspondent.

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: A judge halts Trump administration actions aimed at throttling renewable energy. (Brad Plumer, NY Times, April 21, 2026)

From The New York Times:



Reporting from Washington

A judge halts Trump administration actions aimed at throttling renewable energy.

Image
Wind turbines stand in a field against a blue sky with some wispy white clouds.
The case centers on actions by the Interior Department that slowed or restricted federal approvals for wind and solar projects on both public and private lands.Credit...David Robert Elliott for The New York Times

A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a series of decisions that wind and solar developers say have throttled hundreds of renewable energy projects across the country.

Judge Denise J. Casper of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted a preliminary injunction in a lawsuit that a coalition of renewable energy developers filed against the Interior Department in December. The developers argued that the Trump administration was unlawfully discriminating against wind and solar power, impeding projects on public and private land.

In her ruling, Judge Casper, an Obama appointee, said the developers were likely to prevail on the merits and ordered the Interior Department to stop implementing a series of memos, issued last year, that subjected renewable power to intensified reviews and new restrictions.

The coalition that filed the lawsuit — including RENEW Northeast, the Alliance for Clean Energy New York, the Southern Renewable Energy Association and Interwest Energy Alliance — applauded the ruling. “Our coalition has demanded and received an immediate halt to the Trump administration’s unlawful permitting actions, which have discriminatorily placed wind and solar technologies into second-class status,” the coalition said in a statement.

It is unclear whether the Trump administration will try to appeal the ruling. The White House referred questions to the Interior Department, which said that it does not comment on litigation.

The ruling marked the latest legal setback for the Trump administration in its efforts to thwart wind and solar power. In five different cases this year, federal judges have struck down efforts by the Interior Department to halt construction of wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean.

President Trump has largely scorned wind and solar power, seeking instead to promote fossil fuels like oil, natural gas and coal. The latest case centers on a series of Interior Department actions that greatly slowed or restricted federal approvals for wind and solar projects.

In July, the agency issued a memo saying that a wide array of federal decisions and consultations on wind and solar projects that are typically carried out by career employees would be subject to new layers of review by Interior Secretary Doug Burgum’s office. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers also issued new restrictions for renewable energy projects.

Those actions brought federal permitting for many renewable energy projects to a standstill, developers have said. Career staffers were unsure how to move forward with once-routine work such as approving plans for access roads. Former Interior Department officials said it was unworkable for the secretary to review each of the hundreds of small decisions needed to approve projects, creating lengthy delays.

While fewer than 5 percent of solar and wind projects are on lands directly overseen by the Interior Department, even developers that build on private land often need federal approvals. If, for instance, a solar or wind farm is going to disturb nearby wetlands, the developer may need a water permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which in turn often consults with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to gauge the effects on sensitive habitat.

The renewable energy developers gave examples of numerous projects that had been blocked by the permitting slowdown. One planned wind farm in Illinois had been delayed indefinitely while waiting for wildlife and water permits, the filings said. The project lost its spot in line to connect to the electrical grid after its developer had already invested $10 million.

Image
Doug Burgum wearing a dark suit and a gold tie.
Doug Burgum, the interior secretary, last month.Credit...Eric Lee for The New York Times

The Interior Department had also barred wind and solar developers from using a taxpayer-funded database known as IPaC, which they needed to document the effects that projects might have on wildlife, even though that data was often required for projects to get federal permits.

In her ruling, Judge Casper said that wind and solar developers were likely to suffer “irreparable harm” if the restrictions on renewable energy remained in place. She ordered the Interior Department to stop implementing the July memo that had required all permitting actions to undergo extra layers of review from Mr. Burgum’s office.

She also blocked implementation of a policy that required the Army Corps of Engineers to consider the “energy density” of a power plant when issuing approvals, an action expected to favor fossil fuels. And the judge blocked the ban on access to the IPaC database.

Renewable energy developers had said that the Trump administration’s restrictions on wind and solar power violated the Administrative Procedures Act, which governs executive branch rule-making, in part because they were not sufficiently justified. Judge Casper suggested that the developers were likely to prevail on those points. She noted, for example, that the July Interior memo was a “significant departure” from precedent that would require “more detailed justification” than had been provided.

The ruling does not address all of the Trump administration’s moves to restrict renewable energy. For instance, many proposed wind farms have been stalled because the Defense Department has stopped finalizing agreements designed to address the risk that turbines interfere with radar, developers have said. That issue was not part of this lawsuit.

More on renewable energy and the Trump administration