They fought for the United States of America as "U.S. Colored Troops." They helped liberate Fort Sumter, S.C., helped free slaves and helped occupy Jacksonville, Florida. Some 155 years after the Civil War ended, St. Augustine's black Civil War veterans will finally get a monument.
On August 25, 1879, City burghers tabled/rejected Thomas House's request for a monument to Union veterans, while allowing one for Confederate veterans, relocated from Roman Catholic church property where it resided since 1873.
During 2017-2018, St. Augustine residents debated Confederate veteran monuments. Our City decided to leave the Confederate monument alone, but to contextualize it.
Meanwhile, University of Florida Historic St. Augustine, Inc. made a recommendation to preserve the 1920 cenotaph to General William Wing Loring, located west of Government House.
Then, when UF approved a nearby U.S.C.T. monument design, it never asked U.S.C.T. veterans' descendants. Why?
UF never hired an architect. Why?
UF had a cemetery monument company design a big 'ole tombstone. Why?
UF's unforced errors on U.S.C.T. veterans must be remedied. Now.
"The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice." (Attributed to Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)
Thanks to historian David Nolan for his February 15 letter, "Monumentally bad design." Thanks to our St. Augustine Historic Architectural Review Board, UF will now do its homework, hire an architect and seek public involvement in the design process. How about an heroic sculpture, not just an eight foot wall with words? How about a colorful statue of a U.S.C.T. soldier reading a book?
Our Vietnam Veterans memorial in Washington, D.C. is instructive. Some thought the design was too stark. America added a sculpture of soldiers. That compromise works.
Likewise, HARB believes we need human scale to draw people to learn about U.S.C.T. history. I agree. Come speak out at HARB on April 16, 2020 at 1 pm.
A stark wall, unadorned by art or anything on its backside, does not fit in our Plaza. It is, however, perhaps symbolic of UF's strange relationship with St. Augustine residents and our City's cherished history. Impressions of UF's "historic" operations here include:
o sports bars;
o no-bid leases;
o never asking locals before "rebranding" Government House as "Governor's House";
o evisceration of historic interpretation;
o historical inaccuracies, air-brushing history;
o omitting names of historic re-enactors from credits for PBS documentary on St. Augustine;
Enough flummery. An educational institution "must not be run as a dictatorship," as my mother once wrote a New Jersey college president.
Rose Kennedy's favorite Bible verse was "To whom much is given, much is expected." UF has a $1.825 billion endowment. The State of Florida asked UF to preserve and protect our historic properties. Is UF an unjust steward? Is UF a good neighbor? You tell me.
Mayor Nancy Shaver said, "government is a customer service enterprise." We need higher standards in the place that Dr. King called "the most lawless" in America. UF works for us, not the other way around.
What's next? How will UF respond to HARB?
Let's welcome everyone to speak out on UF in St. Augustine, starting with UF's U.S.C.T. monumental debacle.
UF must learn humility and stewardship. UF must expand and enlarge its St. Augustine board.
UF must hold nighttime meetings and encourage dialogue, debate and diverse views.
UF's future role here will eventually be determined by the legislature.
Preserving St. Augustine's incomparable 12,000 years of history and breathtaking nature requires a St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore, with first-rate National Park Service staff work.
Our City's future is up to you.
Ask questions, demand answers, expect democracy.
With kindest regards, I am,
Lena H. Sun and
Feb. 27, 2020 at 4:18 p.m. EST
The whistleblower is seeking federal protection, alleging she was unfairly and improperly reassigned after raising concerns about the safety of these workers to HHS officials, including those within the office of Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar. She was told Feb. 19 that if she does not accept the new position in 15 days, which is March 5, she would be terminated.
The whistleblower has decades of experience in the field, received two HHS department awards from Azar last year and has received the highest performance evaluations, her lawyers said.
The complaint was filed Wednesday with the Office of the Special Counsel, an independent federal watchdog agency. The whistleblower’s lawyers provided a copy of a redacted 24-page complaint to The Washington Post. A spokesman for the Office of the Special Counsel confirmed that it has received the complaint and assigned the case.
The complaint alleges HHS staffers were “improperly deployed” and were “not properly trained or equipped to operate in a public health emergency situation.” The complaint also alleges the workers were potentially exposed to coronavirus because appropriate steps were not taken to protect them and staffers were not trained in wearing personal protective equipment, even though they had face-to-face contact with returning passengers. The workers were in contact with passengers in an airplane hangar where evacuees were received and on two other occasions: when they helped distribute keys for room assignments and hand out colored ribbons for identification purposes.
In some instances, the teams were working alongside personnel from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in “full gown, gloves and hazmat attire,” the complaint said.
“We take all whistleblower complaints very seriously and are providing the complainant all appropriate protections under the Whistleblower Protection Act. We are evaluating the complaint and have nothing further to add at this time,” HHS spokeswoman Caitlin Oakley said.
The whistleblower, in her complaint, states that “appropriate steps were not taken to quarantine, monitor, or test [the workers] during their deployment and upon their return home.” The repatriated Americans were among those evacuated from Wuhan and quarantined on military bases in California and Texas because they were considered at high risk for contracting the flu-like illness.
About 14 personnel from the Administration for Children and Families, or ACF, were sent to March Air Force base in Riverside County, Calif., and another team of about 13 ACF personnel were sent to Travis Air Force in Solano County, Calif., according to the complaint and the whistleblower’s lawyer, Ari Wilkenfeld. In Solano County this week, the first U.S. patient was confirmed to be infected with coronavirus who did not travel to a region where it is spreading or have known contact with someone diagnosed with the disease.
Several people within HHS voiced objections to sending the ACF personnel to receive passengers, according to a person familiar with the conversations, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.
A second person familiar with the situation said the workers were not tested for coronavirus because none of them met the criteria, which was restricted at that time to people with symptoms and either a recent trip to China or close contact with a person confirmed to be infected with covid19. If the workers had exhibited symptoms, appropriate protocol would have been followed.
The deployments took place Jan. 28 to 31, around the time when the first planeload of evacuees arrived at March, and Feb. 2 to Feb. 7, during the time when additional flights were arriving at Travis. The planes each carried about 200 Americans who were repatriated from Wuhan.
After their deployments, the workers returned to their normal duties, some taking commercial airline flights to return to their offices around the country, the lawyers said.
“Our client was concerned that ACF staff — who were potentially exposed to the coronavirus — were allowed to leave quarantined areas and return to their communities, where they may have spread the coronavirus to others,” said Lauren Naylor, one of the whistleblower’s lawyers.
The whistleblower is also seeking assistance from the office of Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.), a member of the House Ways and Means committee and vice chair of the House Oversight Committee, according to a Gomez spokesman.
During a hearing Thursday, Gomez asked Azar whether any employees from ACF could have been sent to help with the repatriation of Americans from Wuhan without any training in emergency response. Azar replied that some ACF employees were involved.
Asked what sort of health and safety training the personnel received and whether any of them were exposed to high-risk evacuees from China, Azar said: “They never should have been without P.P.E,” referring to personal protective equipment.
Asked whether any protocols may have been broken, given the urgency on the ground, Azar replied urgency was never a reason for breaking safety protocols.
“I don’t believe that has taken place,” Azar said said, adding that health and safety protocols “should always be followed.” He said he did not personally know the names of the team, but other department officials did. Pressed by Gomez what the department would do if untrained employees were exposed to the virus, Azar said: “I’d want to know the full facts, and we’d take appropriate remedial efforts.”
The whistleblower said she received an email Jan. 25 about a potential deployment within ACF to support repatriation of the evacuated Americans, according to her lawyer. She initially supported the efforts because they had the “appearance that this was within ACF’s scope,” Naylor said. But later, she discovered the teams were dispatched without her knowledge by other senior officials at HHS. It was part of the agency’s “all-hands-on-deck” mission, Naylor said, but it broke agency protocol about what kinds of employees should respond to health emergencies. The whistleblower said she later found out about the deployment when she heard directly from some employees and other senior officials at HHS.
Some workers expressed concern about the lack of protective gear to the ACF team leader on the ground. That person joined ACF in September and had “no training or experience in any federal emergency management, public health emergency response, or safety or operational protocols to run the mission,” the complaint states.
ACF personnel typically deal with supporting people recovering from natural disasters, such as floods and fires, and helping victims apply for temporary assistance, all of which are under the category of human services, the whistleblower’s lawyers said. HHS officials broke established protocols for emergency support by sending ACF workers to a health emergency for which they have no training, Naylor said. ACF, which has about 1,300 employees, has been criticized in recent years because of its role in sheltering and taking custody of migrant children who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border and were separated from family members by the Department of Homeland Security.
The workers’ concerns about potential exposure to coronavirus were not addressed, the whistleblower’s lawyers said.
“She was involuntarily assigned to a position in a subject matter where she has no expertise,” Wilkenfeld, her lawyer, said in an interview Thursday. The agency said the reason for the reassignment was “necessary to meet the needs of the department,” according to a memo she received. “If I did not accept involuntary reassignment, I would be terminated from federal service through adverse personnel action,” according to her complaint.
Amy Goldstein contributed to this report.
Updated February 27, 2020
Coronavirus: What you need to read
The latest: California is monitoring 8,400 people who may have been exposed to the coronavirus after traveling to Asia. U.S. workers without protective gear assisted the first Americans coronavirus evacuees, according to a HHS whistleblower.
Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses whose effects range from causing the common cold to triggering much more serious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS. Here are the biggest questions surrounding the virus and what we know so far.
Mapping the spread of the new coronavirus: More than 30 countries have reported at least one case of novel coronavirus since it originated in Wuhan, China.
How does the coronavirus make people sick, and why does it kill some of them? It’s not just the virus that kills them — it’s their own immune system. Here’s how to prepare for coronavirus in the U.S. (Step 1: Don’t panic).
What do you want to know about coronavirus? Let us know here.