Wednesday, January 07, 2026

ANNALS OF TRUMPI$TAN: This Jan. 6 plaque was made to honor law enforcement. It's nowhere to be found at the Capitol. (NPR/AP)

From AP & NPR:

This Jan. 6 plaque was made to honor law enforcement. It's nowhere to be found at the Capitol

A replica plaque commemorating the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot hangs outside the office of Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2025, at the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Julia Demaree Nikhinson
/
AP
A replica plaque commemorating the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot hangs outside the office of Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2025, at the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Approaching the fifth anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, the official plaque honoring the police who defended democracy that day is nowhere to be found.

It's not on display at the Capitol, as is required by law. Its whereabouts aren't publicly known, though it's believed to be in storage.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has yet to formally unveil the plaque. And the Trump administration's Department of Justice is seeking to dismiss a police officers' lawsuit asking that it be displayed as intended. The Architect of the Capitol, which was responsible for obtaining and displaying the plaque, said in light of the federal litigation, it cannot comment.

Determined to preserve the nation's history, some 100 members of Congress, mostly Democrats, have taken it upon themselves to memorialize the moment. For months, they've mounted poster board-style replicas of the Jan. 6 plaque outside their office doors, resulting in a Capitol complex awash with makeshift remembrances.

"On behalf of a grateful Congress, this plaque honors the extraordinary individuals who bravely protected and defended this symbol of democracy on Jan. 6, 2021," reads the faux bronze stand-in for the real thing. "Their heroism will never be forgotten."

Jan. 6 void in the Capitol

In Washington, a capital city lined with monuments to the nation's history, the plaque was intended to become a simple but permanent marker, situated near the Capitol's west front, where some of the most violent fighting took place as rioters breached the building.

But in its absence, the missing plaque makes way for something else entirely — a culture of forgetting.

Visitors can pass through the Capitol without any formal reminder of what happened that day, when a mob of President Donald Trump's supporters stormed the building trying to overturn the Republican's 2020 reelection defeat to Democrat Joe Biden. With memory left unchecked, it allows new narratives to swirl and revised histories to take hold.

Five years ago, the jarring scene watched the world over was declared an "insurrection" by the then-GOP leader of the Senate, while the House GOP leader at the time called it his "saddest day" in Congress. But those condemnations have faded.

Trump calls it a "day of love." And Johnson, who was among those lawmakers challenging the 2020 election results, is now the House speaker.

"The question of January 6 remains – democracy was on the guillotine — how important is that event in the overall sweep of 21st century U.S. history," said Douglas Brinkley, a professor of history at Rice University and noted scholar.

"Will January 6 be seen as the seminal moment when democracy was in peril?" he asked. Or will it be remembered as "kind of a weird one-off?"

"There's not as much consensus on that as one would have thought on the fifth anniversary," he said.

Memories shift, but violent legacy lingers

At least five people died in the riot and its aftermath, including Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot by police while trying to climb through a window toward the House chamber. More than 140 law enforcement officers were wounded, some gravely, and several died later, some by suicide.

All told, some 1,500 people were charged in the Capitol attack, among the largest federal prosecutions in the nation's history. When Trump returned to power in January 2025, he pardoned all of them within hours of taking office.

Unlike the twin light beams that commemorated the Sept. 11, 2001, attack or the stand-alone chairs at the Oklahoma City bombing site memorial, the failure to recognize Jan. 6 has left a gap not only in memory but in helping to stitch the country back together.

"That's why you put up a plaque," said Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon, D-Pa. "You respect the memory and the service of the people involved."

Police sue over Jan. 6 plaque, DOJ seeks to dismiss

The speaker's office said in a statement late Monday the statute authorizing the plaque is "not implementable" and proposed alternatives also "do not comply." Johnson's spokesman said if Democrats are serious about commemorating the police, they're free to work with the appropriate committees to develop a framework for proper vetting and consideration.

A replica plaque commemorating the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot hangs outside the office of Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2025, at the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington.
Julia Demaree Nikhinson / AP
/
AP
A replica plaque commemorating the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot hangs outside the office of Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2025, at the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Lawmakers approved the plaque in March 2022 as part of a broader government funding package. The resolution said the U.S. "owes its deepest gratitude to those officers," and it set out instructions for an honorific plaque listing the names of officers "who responded to the violence that occurred." It gave a one-year deadline for installation at the Capitol.

This summer, two officers who fought the mob that day sued over the delay.

"By refusing to follow the law and honor officers as it is required to do, Congress encourages this rewriting of history," said the claim by officers Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges. "It suggests that the officers are not worthy of being recognized, because Congress refuses to recognize them."

The Justice Department is seeking to have the case dismissed. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro and others argued Congress "already has publicly recognized the service of law enforcement personnel" by approving the plaque and displaying it wouldn't alleviate the problems they claim to face from their work.

"It is implausible," the Justice Department attorneys wrote, to suggest installation of the plaque "would stop the alleged death threats they claim to have been receiving."

The department also said the plaque is required to include the names of "all law enforcement officers" involved in the response that day — some 3,600 people.

Makeshift memorials emerge

Lawmakers who've installed replicas of the plaque outside their offices said it's important for the public to know what happened.

"There are new generations of people who are just growing up now who don't understand how close we came to losing our democracy on Jan 6, 2021," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the Jan. 6 committee, which was opposed by GOP leadership but nevertheless issued a nearly 1,000-page report investigating the run-up to the attack and the attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

Raskin envisions the Capitol one day holding tours around what happened. "People need to study that as an essential part of American history," he said.

"Think about the dates in American history that we know only by the dates: There's the 4th of July. There's December 7th. There's 9/11. And there's January 6th," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-calif., who also served on the committee and has a plaque outside her office.

"They really saved my life, and they saved the democracy and they deserve to be thanked for it," she said.

But as time passes, there are no longer bipartisan memorial services for Jan. 6. On Tuesday, the Democrats will reconvene members from the Jan. 6 committee for a hearing to "examine ongoing threats to free and fair elections," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York announced. It's unlikely Republicans will participate.

The Republicans under Johnson have tapped Rep. Barry Loudermilk of Georgia to stand up their own special committee to uncover what the speaker calls the "full truth" of what happened. They're planning a hearing this month.

"We should stop this silliness of trying to whitewash history -- it's not going to happen," said Rep. Joe Morelle, D-N.Y., who helped lead the effort to display the replica plaques.

"I was here that day so I'll never forget," he said. "I think that Americans will not forget what happened."

The number of makeshift plaques that fill the halls is a testimony to that remembrance, he said.

Instead of one plaque, he said, they've "now got 100." 

Copyright 2026 NPR

Guest column: Robin Nadeau worked for a more sustainable world. (St. Augustine Record, February 5, 2012)

Guest column: Robin Nadeau worked for a more sustainable world


We moved to St. Augustine in 1999. I was first contacted, encouraged and empowered by Robin Nadeau in 2000, after Robin read my December 3, 2000 St. Augustine Record column, “Democracy under pressure,” about the strange case of Bush v. Gore (Florida election recount lawsuit). Below is my 600 word guest column about Robin Nadeau, from yesterday's St. Augustine Record (coincidentally, I saw my first butterfly of 2012 while walking that morning):


Guest column: Robin Nadeau worked for a more sustainable world
Posted: February 5, 2012 - 12:32am

By ED SLAVIN
St. Augustine

Hundreds of Robin Nadeau’s friends joined her family, celebrating her life on Jan. 23.

“Thinking globally, acting locally,” always young at heart, Robin knew “freedom is never free.” “Speaking truth to power,” she worked for positive change and a more sustainable world.

Citizen Robin Nadeau (1926-2012) was a zealous environmentalist, peace activist, government reformer and free speech defender. Robin won the Daughters of the American Revolution National Conservation Award for work planting/saving thousands of trees (where greed once endangered them all).

Robin supported “Medicare for All,” Solar/Wind energy, Progressive Taxation and Environmental Justice. She opposed polluters’ promiscuously weakening our environmental laws. She exposed the horrors of nuclear power plants, offshore oil, and dirty money in politics.

She succeeded in convincing governments to buy park land, including a now-threatened 6.1 acres at St. Augustine Beach.

Robin was kind, logical, thoughtful, winning progressive victories with information, research, diplomacy and tact. Robin had what Ambassador Andrew Young calls “soul force.”

Few said “no” to Robin Nadeau.

A faithful convert to Roman Catholicism, she supported Occupy St. Augustine, Grandmothers for Peace, NAACP, League of Women Voters and Sierra Club. She championed equality for gays and lesbians.

Robin encouraged and nurtured so many people.

Robin knew that “decisions are made by those who show up,” showing up for decades. Her work was a tale of two cities (St. Augustine and St. Augustine Beach) and St. Johns County, persuading all to adopt tree protections, serving for decades on city and county boards and as TREES VP for 13 years.

In December 2006, Robin persuaded me to help investigate our Mosquito Control District’s luxury jet helicopter purchase and organophosphate spraying. Together, we helped kill the $1.8 million, no-bid helicopter, winning a refund. It took us nine months, enduring AMCD’s then-chair’s insults and arrest threats. The people won. Robin wrote in her autobiographical note, “I contributed to an ultimately successful effort to replace use of organophosphates to control mosquitoes in St. Johns County with environmentally friendly techniques.”

In 2007-08, Robin and I sought ballot-petition signatures for Democratic Congressional candidate Faye Armitage in local parks. Someone threatened to have us arrested, exclaiming, “I know the law!” Gently, Robin and I stood our ground. First Amendment rights prevailed.

Robin believed in hope, forgiveness, democracy and Democrats: as precinct committeeperson, Robin worked hardest of all.

Robin Nadeau lived with joy, wit and style, getting things done (often working until 3 a.m.). Like Thomas Jefferson, she loved beauty and she designed her own home. She had an infectious laugh, threw wonderful Twelfth Night parties, and made the best orange marmalade.

The Record printed a cognitive miser’s 2004 letter, attacking “the Robin Nadeaus of the world.” I responded, “thanking the Robin Nadeaus of this world,” who bring us moral strength.

“Robin Nadeau family values” are based on love, reality and kindness — the opposite of “faux FOX-TV family values,” based on prejudice, ignorance and hatred.

With all of her beautiful heart, soul and “PBS mind,” Robin Nadeau avidly supported the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore since 2006. St. Augustine Beach Mayor Gary Snodgrass remembers Robin telephoning him about the proposal two months ago — he was in the shower, but took her call.

Robin’s inner strength showed on Nov. 1, as park supporters were called “Nazis” and “Communists” by angry, misguided “Tea Partiers,” who momentarily scared off our County Commissioners from supporting the Historical Park and Seashore. Enough. errant nonsense!

Give Robin Nadeau the last word. She wrote, “I think my greatest achievement lay in my contribution to enactment of the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore Act of 2012.” Let’s do it for Robin!  www.staugustgreen.com




Ed Slavin has a bachelor of science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University and a Juris Doctor from Memphis State University (now University of Memphis).

READ TRUMP "TREATY" WITH TERRORISTS -- FEBRUARY 29, 2020 TALIBAN "TREATY"

WHO WOULD SIGN A "TREATY" WITH TALIBAN TERRORISTS, AND ON WHAT THEORY? 

Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan

between the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States

as a state and is known as the Taliban and the United States of America

February 29, 2020

which corresponds to Rajab 5, 1441 on the Hijri Lunar calendar

and Hoot 10, 1398 on the Hijri Solar calendar

A comprehensive peace agreement is made of four parts:

1. Guarantees and enforcement mechanisms that will prevent the use of the soil of Afghanistan by

any group or individual against the security of the United States and its allies.

2. Guarantees, enforcement mechanisms, and announcement of a timeline for the withdrawal of

all foreign forces from Afghanistan.

3. After the announcement of guarantees for a complete withdrawal of foreign forces and timeline

in the presence of international witnesses, and guarantees and the announcement in the presence

of international witnesses that Afghan soil will not be used against the security of the United

States and its allies, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United

States as a state and is known as the Taliban will start intra-Afghan negotiations with Afghan

sides on March 10, 2020, which corresponds to Rajab 15, 1441 on the Hijri Lunar calendar and

Hoot 20, 1398 on the Hijri Solar calendar.

4. A permanent and comprehensive ceasefire will be an item on the agenda of the intra-Afghan

dialogue and negotiations. The participants of intra-Afghan negotiations will discuss the date

and modalities of a permanent and comprehensive ceasefire, including joint implementation

mechanisms, which will be announced along with the completion and agreement over the future

political roadmap of Afghanistan.

The four parts above are interrelated and each will be implemented in accordance with its own agreed

timeline and agreed terms. Agreement on the first two parts paves the way for the last two parts.

Following is the text of the agreement for the implementation of parts one and two of the above. Both

sides agree that these two parts are interconnected. The obligations of the Islamic Emirate of

Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban in this

agreement apply in areas under their control until the formation of the new post-settlement Afghan

Islamic government as determined by the intra-Afghan dialogue and negotiations.

PART ONE

The United States is committed to withdraw from Afghanistan all military forces of the United States,

its allies, and Coalition partners, including all non-diplomatic civilian personnel, private security

contractors, trainers, advisors, and supporting services personnel within fourteen (14) months following

announcement of this agreement, and will take the following measures in this regard:

. IA. B. C. The United States, its allies, and the Coalition will take the following measures in the first one

hundred thirty-five (135) days:

1) They will reduce the number of U.S. forces in Afghanistan to eight thousand six hundred

(8,600) and proportionally bring reduction in the number of its allies and Coalition

forces.

2) The United States, its allies, and the Coalition will withdraw all their forces from five

(5) military bases.

With the commitment and action on the obligations of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which

is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban in Part Two of this

agreement, the United States, its allies, and the Coalition will execute the following:

1) The United States, its allies, and the Coalition will complete withdrawal of all remaining

forces from Afghanistan within the remaining nine and a half (9.5) months.

2) The United States, its allies, and the Coalition will withdraw all their forces from

remaining bases.

The United States is committed to start immediately to work with all relevant sides on a plan

to expeditiously release combat and political prisoners as a confidence building measure with

the coordination and approval of all relevant sides. Up to five thousand (5,000) prisoners of

the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban and up to one thousand (1,000) prisoners of the other side will be

released by March 10, 2020, the first day of intra-Afghan negotiations, which corresponds to

Rajab 15, 1441 on the Hijri Lunar calendar and Hoot 20, 1398 on the Hijri Solar calendar.

The relevant sides have the goal of releasing all the remaining prisoners over the course of the

subsequent three months. The United States commits to completing this goal. The Islamic

Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known

as the Taliban commits that its released prisoners will be committed to the responsibilities

mentioned in this agreement so that they will not pose a threat to the security of the United

States and its allies.

D. With the start of intra-Afghan negotiations, the United States will initiate an administrative

review of current U.S. sanctions and the rewards list against members of the Islamic Emirate of

Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban

with the goal of removing these sanctions by August 27, 2020, which corresponds to Muharram

8, 1442 on the Hijri Lunar calendar and Saunbola 6, 1399 on the Hijri Solar calendar.

E. With the start of intra-Afghan negotiations, the United States will start diplomatic engagement

with other members of the United Nations Security Council and Afghanistan to remove

members of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as

a state and is known as the Taliban from the sanctions list with the aim of achieving this

objective by May 29, 2020, which corresponds to Shawwal 6, 1441 on the Hijri Lunar calendar

and Jawza 9, 1399 on the Hijri Solar calendar.

. IIF. The United States and its allies will refrain from the threat or the use of force against the

territorial integrity or political independence of Afghanistan or intervening in its domestic

affairs.

PART TWO

In conjunction with the announcement of this agreement, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is

not recognized by the United States as a state and is known as the Taliban will take the following steps

to prevent any group or individual, including al-Qa’ida, from using the soil of Afghanistan to threaten

the security of the United States and its allies:

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban will not allow any of its members, other individuals or groups, including

al-Qa’ida, to use the soil of Afghanistan to threaten the security of the United States and its

allies.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban will send a clear message that those who pose a threat to the security

of the United States and its allies have no place in Afghanistan, and will instruct members of

the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban not to cooperate with groups or individuals threatening the security of

the United States and its allies.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban will prevent any group or individual in Afghanistan from threatening

the security of the United States and its allies, and will prevent them from recruiting, training,

and fundraising and will not host them in accordance with the commitments in this agreement.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban is committed to deal with those seeking asylum or residence in

Afghanistan according to international migration law and the commitments of this agreement,

so that such persons do not pose a threat to the security of the United States and its allies.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United States as a state and

is known as the Taliban will not provide visas, passports, travel permits, or other legal

documents to those who pose a threat to the security of the United States and its allies to enter

Afghanistan.

1. PART THREE

The United States will request the recognition and endorsement of the United Nations Security

Council for this agreement.

. III2. The United States and the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan which is not recognized by the United

States as a state and is known as the Taliban seek positive relations with each other and expect

that the relations between the United States and the new post-settlement Afghan Islamic

government as determined by the intra-Afghan dialogue and negotiations will be positive.

3. The United States will seek economic cooperation for reconstruction with the new post-

settlement Afghan Islamic government as determined by the intra-Afghan dialogue and

negotiations, and will not intervene in its internal affairs.

Signed in Doha, Qatar on February 29, 2020, which corresponds to Rajab 5, 1441 on the Hijri Lunar

calendar and Hoot 10, 1398 on the Hijri Solar calendar, in duplicate, in Pashto, Dari, and English

languages, each text being equally authentic.