It isn’t clear who created the image, but it fits Trump’s well-established style, dense with the basic icons of American patriotism and militarism, foregrounding the flag and the bald eagle, with the Statue of Liberty and the Lincoln Memorial in the background. There are jet planes and bombs bursting in air and soldiers marching magically, or celestially, through the firmament.
Like the paintings of Jon McNaughton, a pro-Trump artist who often paints mash-ups of patriotic and Christian imagery, the Trump-as-healer image is overstuffed with people, or rather, The People, a homogenized assembly reduced to the basic archetypes of awe, rapture, resilience and determination. And dependence. Like a famous Trump portrait by artist Julian Raven, it flatters the president in ways that conform to his well-known insecurities, filling in his thinning hair.
The graphic style has its roots in the picture-book illustrators of the 20th century. Whoever made this was crudely striving for the narrative clarity and emotional immediacy of artists such as N.C. Wyeth or Norman Rockwell. But it doesn’t even rise to the level of lesser figures, like Arnold Friberg, who created perhaps the closest analogue: A famous series of paintings to illustrate the Book of Mormon, full of drama and a similar mix of muscularity, vigor and saintliness.
Condensation is essential to narrative clarity, and that’s where this image, like so much AI slop, fails utterly. Trump often doubles or trebles when a single thing would be better, or sufficient. Thus, he erected not one but two giant flagpoles outside the White House. And here, the artist doubles the eagle and triples the planes. Less is usually more; in this case, more just reads as desperate.
Editing an image down to its essentials, however, requires the artist to make choices and set boundaries. In a famous painting of George Washington at Valley Forge, Friberg shows the nation’s leader kneeling beside his horse, praying. A shaft of light bathes the general and his steed in golden light, suggesting divine sanction to the American project. It’s patriotic glop, but it’s effective, and it stays within the bounds of acceptable democratic imagery by representing Washington’s faith, rather than any suggestion that he himself is a divine figure.
The inability to edit this picture, to clarify its message, should have offended even the most ardent Trump supporters who didn’t balk at the blasphemy. You can’t have an image of healing without somebody being sick, and this image embodies sickness in the form of a middle-aged White man with a haggard face and the rough hands of a workingman. Thus, it is Trump’s base — his core supporters — who the image implies are sick.
It also suggests that the bond between Trump and his base is one of mutual dependence, perhaps codependence. The light that emanates from his hand — which is often seen in photographs covered with bruises and makeup The inability to edit this picture, to clarify its message, should have offended even the most ardent Trump supporters who didn’t balk at the blasphemy. You can’t have an image of healing without somebody being sick, and this image embodies sickness in the form of a middle-aged White man with a haggard face and the rough hands of a workingman. Thus, it is Trump’s base — his core supporters — who the image implies are sick.
It also suggests that the bond between Trump and his base is one of mutual dependence, perhaps codependence. The light that emanates from his hand — which is often seen in photographs covered with bruises and makeup
No comments:
Post a Comment