SILVERLEAF, with 400 voters, gets its own precinct -- Developer is State Senator TRAVIS J. HUTSON -- Rotten or pocket borough?

Elected with developer financial support in 2020, St. Johns County Supervisor of Elections VICTORIA OAKES a/k/a "VICHY OAKES" wrongfully withheld documents from County Commissioners and citizens alike on her choosing what she called "my new voting precincts," effective 2022-2032, despite my Open Records request last month. 

St. Johns County Commissioners voted 4-0 to approve the new precincts at their May 3, 2022 SJC BoCC meeting. (Commissioner Paul Waldron's absence was excused.)

Before incurious Commissioners voted in lockstep, without legal advice, to approve our new precincts at their May 3, 2022 St. Johns County Commission meeting, Ms. OAKES sprung a plethora of explanations for "her" new precincts.

She said she desires to be creative and "visionary." 

That's a switch.  

I've found VICHY OAKES to be a proverbial cognitive miser, in the past, for years resisting adding an early voting precinct for St. Augustine and West Augustine until after I filed complaints with the Justice Department Civil Rights Division Voting Section, 2006-2020.

So now she's a "visionary?" Mutatis mutandis, she pulled a fast one and got Commissioners to approve "her' new precincts without providing documents on her selection process or outside assistance. 

She added an entire new voting precinct for State Senator TRAVIS HUTSON's SILVERLEAF development, which has only 400 registered voters.  HUTSON proposed=s a vastly expanded SILVERLEAF DEVELOPMENT, seeking to add 2300 acres and 5600 dwelling units.

• It costs $32,270 to open a new Election Day polling place.
• It's our money.
• There were no pertinent Commissioner questions.
• HUTSON COMPANIES, allied developers and their keiretsu generously support our County Commission campaigns.
• Some Commissioners appear to be bought and paid for, or at least rented.
• Developer puppet Commissioner CHRISTIAN WHITEHURST said, "I'm so glad you're my Supervisor" (stated oleaginously by the pie-faced Commissioner, ala Eddie Haskell from "Leave It to Beaver").
• SILVERLEAF expansion is on the agenda for the May 17, 2022 County Commission meeting. 
• The SILVERLEAF expansion might not take place until 2030 at the earliest.
• Its premature consideration was a Christmas gift to HUTSON December 21, 2021.
• SILVERLEAF expansion was approved by Commission then but rejected by state officials, who sent it back, as expected.
• Thus, is VICHY OAKES assuming massive expansion before the Commission and courts get to rule on the matter is a case of assuming facts not in evidence, wasting taxpayer money on an extra precinct when none may be needed?
• Is this SILVERLEAF 400 voter precinct a "Rotten or Pocket Borough," like the wealthy had in Great Britain until the 1800s? 
• Is this a case of Commissioners and TRAVIS HUTSON & Co. "counting their chickens before they hatch?" 
• Is this another example of what Senator J. William Fulbright called "The Arrogance of Power?"
• Is this yet another example of HUTSON's influence on one-party RINO rule by hick hack Tammany Hall huckster style local government officials? 
• Is St. Johns County -- even our Supervisor of Elections office -- now run for the benefit of rapacious land-raping developer billionaires (and half-baked half-billionaires like DAVID HUTSON & CO.), organized criminaloid personalities, whom sagacious former County Commission Chair Ben C. Rich Sr. once called "worse than any carpetbagger?"
• This subtle corruption of our government by the wealthy and their corporations is indefensible, and must be ended at once.  

-----------

Rotten and pocket boroughs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

hideThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification.  (April 2019) This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations.  (April 2019) Old Sarum in Wiltshire, an uninhabited hill which until 1832 elected two Members of Parliament. Painting by John Constable, 1829 A rotten or pocket borough, also known as a nomination borough or proprietorial borough, was a parliamentary boroughor constituency in England, Great Britain, or the United Kingdom before the Reform Act 1832, which had a very small electorate and could be used by a patron to gain unrepresentative influence within the unreformed House of Commons. The same terms were used for similar boroughs represented in the 18th-century Parliament of Ireland. The Reform Act 1832abolished the majority of these rotten and pocket boroughs. Contents 1Background 2Rotten boroughs 3Pocket boroughs 4Reform 5Contemporary defences 6Modern usage 6.1Fiction 7Quotations 8See also 9References 10Further reading Background[edit source] A parliamentary borough was a town or former town that had been incorporated under a royal charter, giving it the right to send two elected burgesses as Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons. It was not unusual for the physical boundary of the settlement to change as the town developed or contracted over time, for example due to changes in its trade and industry, so that the boundaries of the parliamentary borough and of the physical settlement were no longer the same. For centuries, constituencies electing members to the House of Commons did not change to reflect population shifts, and in some places the number of electors became so few that they could be bribed or otherwise influenced by a single wealthy patron. In the early 19th century, reformists scornfully called these boroughs "rotten boroughs" or "pocket boroughs", or more formally "nomination boroughs", because their democratic processes were rotten and their MPs were elected by the whim of the patron, thus "in his pocket"; the actual votes of the electors were a mere formality; all or most of them voted as the patron instructed them, with or without bribery. As voting was by show of hands at a single polling station at a single time, none dared to vote contrary to the instructions of the patron. Often only one candidate would be nominated (or two for a two-seat constituency), so that the election was uncontested. Thus an MP might represent only a few constituents, while at the same time many new towns, which had grown due to increased trade and industry, were entirely unrepresented, or inadequately represented. For example, before 1832 the town of Manchester, which expanded rapidly during the Industrial Revolution from a small settlement into a large city, was merely part of the larger county constituency of Lancashire and did not elect its own MPs. Many of these ancient boroughs elected two MPs. By the time of the 1831 general election, out of 406 elected members, 152 were chosen by fewer than 100 voters each, and 88 by fewer than fifty voters.[1] By the early 19th century moves were made towards reform, with eventual success when the Reform Act 1832 abolished the rotten boroughs and redistributed representation in Parliament to new major population centres. The Ballot Act 1872 introduced the secret ballot, which greatly hindered patrons from controlling elections by preventing them from knowing how an elector had voted. At the same time, the practice of paying or entertaining voters ("treating") was outlawed, and election expenses fell dramatically. Rotten boroughs[edit source] The term rotten borough came into use in the 18th century; it meant a parliamentary borough with a tiny electorate, so small that voters were susceptible to control in a variety of ways, as it had declined in population and importance since its early days. The word rotten had the connotation of corruption as well as long-term decline. In such boroughs most or all of the few electors could not vote as they pleased, due to the lack of a secret ballot and their dependency on the "owner" of the borough. Only rarely were the views or personal character of a candidate taken into consideration, except by the minority of voters who were not beholden to a particular interest. Typically, rotten boroughs had gained their representation in Parliament when they were more flourishing centres, but the borough's boundaries had never been updated, or else they had become depopulated or even deserted over the centuries. Some had once been important places or had played a major role in England's history, but had fallen into insignificance as for example when industry moved away. For example, in the 12th century Old Sarum had been a busy cathedral city, reliant on the wealth expended by its own Sarum Cathedral within its city precincts, but it was abandoned when the cathedral was moved to create the present Salisbury Cathedral, built on a new site nearby ("New Sarum"). The new site immediately attracted merchants and workers who built up a new town around it. Despite this dramatic loss of population, the constituency of Old Sarum retained its right to elect two MPs, effectively putting it in control of a single landowning family. Many such rotten boroughs were controlled by landowners and peers who might give the seats in Parliament to their like-minded friends or relations, or who went to Parliament themselves, if they were not already members of the House of Lords. They also commonly sold them for money or other favours; the peers who controlled such boroughs had a double influence in Parliament as they themselves held seats in the House of Lords. This patronage was based on property rights which could be inherited and passed on to heirs, or else sold, like any other form of property. Examples of rotten boroughs Borough County Houses Voters Notes Old Sarum Wiltshire 3 7 Gatton Surrey 23 7 Newtown Isle of Wight 14 23 East Looe Cornwall 167 38 Dunwich Suffolk 44 32 Most of this formerly prosperous town had fallen into the sea Plympton Erle Devon 182 40 One seat was controlled from the mid-17th century to 1832 by the Treby family of Plympton House Bramber West Sussex 35 20 Callington Cornwall 225 42 Controlled by the Rolle family of Heanton Satchville and Stevenstone in Devon Trim County Meath Parliament of Ireland Before being awarded a peerage, Arthur Wellesley, later Duke of Wellington, served in the Irish House of Commons as a Member for the rotten borough of Trim. Robert Stewart, Viscount Castlereagh served as a Member for the rotten borough of Plympton Erle. Pocket boroughs[edit source] Pocket boroughs were boroughs which could effectively be controlled by a single person who owned at least half of the "burgage tenements", the occupants of which had the right to vote in the borough's parliamentary elections. A wealthy patron therefore had merely to buy up these specially qualified houses and install in them his own tenants, selected for their willingness to do their landlord's bidding, or given such precarious forms of tenure that they dared not displease him. As there was no secret ballot until 1872, the landowner could evict electors who did not vote for the two men he wanted. A common expression referring to such a situation was that "Mr A had been elected on Lord B's interest". There were also boroughs which were controlled not by a particular patron but rather by the Crown, specifically by the departments of state of the Treasury or Admiralty, and which thus returned the candidates nominated by the ministers in charge of those departments.[2] Some rich individuals controlled several boroughs; for example, the Duke of Newcastle is said to have had seven boroughs "in his pocket". One of the representatives of a pocket borough was often the man who controlled it, and for this reason they were also referred to as proprietarial boroughs.[3]: 14  Pocket boroughs were seen by their 19th-century owners as a valuable method of ensuring the representation of the landed interest in the House of Commons.[citation needed] Significantly diminished by the Reform Act 1832, pocket boroughs were for all practical purposes abolished by the Reform Act of 1867. This considerably extended the borough franchise and established the principle that each parliamentary constituency should hold roughly the same number of electors. Boundary commissions were set up by subsequent Acts of Parliament to maintain this principle as population movements continued.[citation needed] Reform[edit source] In the late 18th century, many political societies, like the London Corresponding Society and the Society of the Friends of the People, called for parliamentary reform.[4]Specifically, they thought that the rotten borough system was unfair, and they called for a more equal distribution of representatives that reflected the population of Britain.[5] However, legislation enacted by William Pitt the Younger caused these societies to disband by enacting legislation that made it illegal for these societies to meet or publish information.[6] In the 19th century, there were moves towards Reform, which broadly meant ending the over-representation of boroughs with few electors. The issue which finally brought the Reform issue to a head was the arrival of Catholic Emancipation in 1829, and the Reform movement had a major success in the Reform Act 1832, which disfranchised the 56 boroughs listed below, most of them in the south and west of England, and redistributed representation in Parliament to new major population centres and to places with significant industries, which tended to be farther north. Cornwall Bossiney Callington Camelford East Looe Fowey Lostwithiel Mitchell, or St Michael's Newport Saltash St Germans St Mawes Tregony West Looe Wiltshire Downton Great Bedwyn Heytesbury Hindon Ludgershall Old Sarum Wootton Bassett Sussex Bramber East Grinstead Seaford Steyning Winchelsea Hampshire Newtown, Isle of Wight Stockbridge Whitchurch Yarmouth, Isle of Wight Other counties Aldborough, West Riding of Yorkshire Aldeburgh, Suffolk Amersham, Buckinghamshire Appleby, Westmorland Beeralston, Devon Bishop's Castle, Shropshire Bletchingley, Surrey Boroughbridge, North Riding of Yorkshire Brackley, Northamptonshire Castle Rising, Norfolk Corfe Castle, Dorset Dunwich, Suffolk Gatton, Surrey Haslemere, Surrey Hedon, East Riding of Yorkshire Higham Ferrers, Northamptonshire Ilchester, Somerset Milborne Port, Somerset Minehead, Somerset New Romney, Kent Newton, Lancashire Okehampton, Devon Orford, Suffolk Plympton Erle, Devon Queenborough, Kent Wendover, Buckinghamshire Weobley, Herefordshire Contemporary defences[edit source] A substantial number of Tory constituencies were rotten and pocket boroughs, and their right to representation was defended by the successive Tory governments in office between 1807 and 1830. During this period they came under criticism from prominent figures such as Thomas Paine and William Cobbett.[3] It was argued in defence of such boroughs that they provided stability and were also a means for promising young politicians to enter Parliament, with William Pitt the Elder being cited as a key example.[3]: 22  Some MPs claimed that the boroughs should be retained, as Britain had enjoyed periods of prosperity while they were part of the constitution of Parliament. Because British colonists in the West Indies and British North America, and those in the Indian subcontinent, had no representation of their own at Westminster, representatives of these groups often claimed that rotten boroughs provided opportunities for virtual representation in Parliament for colonial interest groups.[7] The Tory politician Spencer Perceval asked the nation to look at the system as a whole, saying that if pocket boroughs were disenfranchised, the whole system was liable to collapse.[8] Modern usage[edit source] The magazine Private Eye has a column entitled 'Rotten Boroughs', which lists stories of municipal wrongdoing;[9] borough is used here in its usual sense of a local-government district rather than a parliamentary constituency. In his book The Age of Consent (2003), George Monbiot compared small island states with one vote in the United Nations General Assembly to "rotten boroughs". The term "rotten borough" is sometimes used to disparage electorates used to gain political leverage. In Hong Kong and Macau, functional constituencies (with small voter-bases attached to special interests) are often referred to as "rotten boroughs" by long-time columnist Jake van der Kamp. In New Zealand, the term has been used to refer to electorates which – by dint of an agreement for a larger party – have been won by a minor party, enabling that party to gain more seats under the country's proportional representation system.[10] The Spectator has described the London Borough of Tower Hamlets as a "rotten borough",[11] and in 2015 The Independent reported that Tower Hamlets was to be the subject of an investigation into electoral fraud.[12] The Electoral Reform Society produced a list of "Rotten Boroughs" for the 2019 United Kingdom local elections, with Fenland District Council at the top.[13] Fiction[edit source] This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Rotten and pocket boroughs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR  (July 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In the satirical novel Melincourt, or Sir Oran Haut-Ton (1817) by Thomas Love Peacock, an orang-utan named Sir Oran Haut-Ton is elected to parliament by the "ancient and honourable borough of Onevote". The election of Sir Oran forms part of the hero's plan to persuade civilisation to share his belief that orang-utans are a race of human beings who merely lack the power of speech. "The borough of Onevote stood in the middle of a heath, and consisted of a solitary farm, of which the land was so poor and intractable, that it would not have been worth the while of any human being to cultivate it, had not the Duke of Rottenburgh found it very well worth his while to pay his tenant for living there, to keep the honourable borough in existence." The single voter of the borough, Mr Christopher Corporate, elects two MPs, each of whom "can only be considered as the representative of half of him". In the parliamentary novels of Anthony Trollope rotten boroughs are a recurring theme. John Grey, Phineas Finn, and Lord Silverbridge are all elected by rotten boroughs. In Chapter 7 of the novel 'Vanity Fair (published 1847-1848), author William Makepeace Thackeray introduces the fictitious borough of "Queen's Crawley", so named in honour of a stopover in the small Hampshire town of Crawley by Queen Elizabeth I, who, delighted by the quality of the local beer, instantly raised the small town of Crawley into a borough, giving it two members in Parliament. At the time of the story, set in the early-19th century, the place had lost population, so that it was "come down to that condition of borough which used to be denominated rotten". Queen's Crawley re-appears in Thackeray's The Virginians (published in 1857-1859). In Charles Dickens' novel Our Mutual Friend (1864-1865), a borough called "Pocket-Breaches" elects Mr. Veneering as its MP. Rotten Borough was a controversial story published by Oliver Anderson under the pen name Julian Pine in 1937, republished in 1989. In Diana Wynne Jones' 2003 book The Merlin Conspiracy, Old Sarum features as a character, with one line being "I'm a rotten borough, I am." In the Aubrey–Maturin series of sea-faring tales, the pocket borough of Milport (also known as Milford) is initially held by General Aubrey, the father of protagonist Jack Aubrey. In the twelfth novel in the series, The Letter of Marque (1988), Jack's father dies and the seat is offered to Jack himself by his cousin Edward Norton, the "owner" of the borough. The borough has just seventeen electors, all of whom are tenants of Mr Norton. In the 1969 first novel of George MacDonald Fraser's The Flashman Papers series, the eponymous antihero, Harry Flashman, mentions that his father, Sir Buckley Flashman, had been in Parliament, but "they did for him at Reform" - implying that the elder Flashman's seat was a rotten or pocket borough. In the episode "Dish and Dishonesty" of the BBC television comedy Blackadder the Third, Edmund Blackadder attempts to bolster support for the Prince Regent in Parliament by getting the incompetent Baldrick elected to the fictional rotten borough of "Dunny-on-the-Wold". He easily accomplished this with a result of 16,472 to nil, even though the constituency had only one voter (Blackadder himself).[14] The video game Assassin's Creed III briefly mentions pocket and rotten boroughs in a database entry entitled "Pocket Boroughs", with Old Sarum identified as one of the worst examples of a pocket borough. In the game, shortly before the Boston Massacre a non-player character (NPC) can be heard speaking to a group of people on the colonies' lack of representation in Parliament and listing several rotten boroughs, including Old Sarum. Quotations[edit source] "[Borough representation is] the rotten part of the constitution." — William Pitt the Elder "The county of Yorkshire, which contains near a million souls, sends two county members; and so does the county of Rutland which contains not a hundredth part of that number. The town of Old Sarum, which contains not three houses, sends two members; and the town of Manchester, which contains upwards of sixty thousand souls, is not admitted to send any. Is there any principle in these things?" Tom Paine, from Rights of Man, 1791 From H.M.S. Pinafore by Gilbert and Sullivan: Sir Joseph Porter: I grew so rich that I was sent By a pocket borough into Parliament. I always voted at my party's call, And I never thought of thinking for myself at all. Chorus: And he never thought of thinking for himself at all. Sir Joseph: I thought so little, they rewarded me By making me the Ruler of the Queen's Navee! From Iolanthe by Gilbert and Sullivan: Fairy Queen: Let me see. I've a borough or two at my disposal. Would you like to go into Parliament? From The Letter of Marque by Patrick O'Brian 'Could you not spend an afternoon at Milport, to meet the electors? There are not many of them, and those few are all my tenants, so it is no more than a formality; but there is a certain decency to be kept up. The writ will be issued very soon.' The Borough of Queen's Crawley in Thackeray's Vanity Fair is a rotten borough eliminated by the Reform Act of 1832: When Colonel Dobbin quitted the service, which he did immediately after his marriage, he rented a pretty country place in Hampshire, not far from Queen's Crawley, where, after the passing of the Reform Bill, Sir Pitt and his family constantly resided now. All idea of a peerage was out of the question, the baronet's two seats in Parliament being lost. He was both out of pocket and out of spirits by that catastrophe, failed in his health, and prophesied the speedy ruin of the Empire. See also[edit source] Apportionment (politics) Functional constituencies in Hong Kong and Macau Gerrymandering References[edit source] ^ Carpenter, William (1831). The People's Book; Comprising their Chartered Rights and Practical Wrongs. London: W. Strange. p. 406. ^ Namier, Lewis (1929). The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III. London: Macmillan. ^ Jump up to: a b c Pearce, Robert D.; Stearn, Roger (2000). Government and Reform: Britain, 1815-1918 (2nd ed.). London: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 9780340789476. ^ Hampsher-Monk, Iain (1979). "Civic Humanism and Parliamentary Reform: The Case of the Society of the Friends of the People". Journal of British Studies. 18 (2): 70–89. doi:10.1086/385738. JSTOR 175513. ^ England (1793). The State of the Representation of England and Wales, Delivered to the Society, the Friends of the People ... on ... the 9th of February, 1793. London. ^ Emsley, Clive (985). "Repression, 'Terror' and the Rule of Law in England During the Decade of the French Revolution". The English Historical Review. Oxford University Press. 100 (397): 801–825. JSTOR 572566. ^ Taylor, Miles (2003). "Empire and Parliamentary Reform: The 1832 Reform Act Revisited". In Burns, Arthur; Innes, Joanna (eds.). Rethinking the Age of Reform: Britain 1780-1850. Cambridge University Press. pp. 295–312. ISBN 9780521823944. ^ Evans, Eric J. (1990). Liberal Democracies. Joint Matriculation Board. p. 104. ^ "Rotten Boroughs". Private Eye. Retrieved 3 February 2020. ^ Murray, J. "Banksy's brew not so bewitching this time round", 3 News, 11 November 2011. Retrieved 1 February 2014. ^ "Tower Hamlets — London's rotten borough | Coffee House". Blogs.spectator.co.uk. 26 May 2014. Retrieved 13 September 2018. ^ Morris, Nigel (13 August 2015). "Eric Pickles to lead electoral fraud investigation into 'rotten boroughs' after Tower Hamlets scandal". The Independent. Retrieved 13 February 2020. ^ "Rotten Boroughs". www.cambstimes.co.uk. 20 April 2019. Retrieved 21 May2021. ^ "Black Adder - Episode Guide: Dish and Dishonesty". BBC. Retrieved 2 May2010. Further reading[edit source] Spielvogel, Western Civilization — Volume II: Since 1500 (2003) p. 493 Lewis Namier, The Structure of Politics at the Accession of George III, 1929. Categories:  Rotten boroughs show v t e Electoral reform in the United Kingdom