Sunday, April 07, 2024

Increasingly chaotic’: Why House Republicans are heading for the exits (Marianna Sotomayor, WaPo)

Remember when there were good Republicans?  Congressmen who look to billionaires, or pretend billionaires, for funding and policy have reaped the whirlwind.  From The Washington Post: 

Increasingly chaotic’: Why House Republicans are heading for the exits 

The decision by 21 Republican lawmakers to depart is indicative of the broader morale problem within the GOP conference

April 7, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. EDT
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is managing an increasingly demoralized GOP conference as 21 of his members head for the exits. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post)
10 min
Add to your saved stories

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise thought he had a good argument for Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wis.).

The Wisconsin Republican had announced he was going to leave Congress, one of 21 Republicans who have said they are headed for the exits this year. But three Republicans who had previously announced their intention to leave had reconsidered and were now going to stay. Scalise (R-La.) wanted to emphasize that momentum to Gallagher, hoping the young rising star might reconsider.

The sell hasn’t worked yet. Gallagher, 40, is set to retire earlier than previously expected, leaving the House with just a one-vote majority when he departs April 19.

The tumultuous year in a slim majority hasn’t necessarily pushed departing Republicans to seek higher office or pursue other opportunities away from Capitol Hill. But it reaffirmed for most that they made the right call to leave, that because the House has become more partisan, it is now more difficult to pass legislation that makes an impact than when many were first elected.

The decisions to depart are yet another sign of the broader drop in morale within the GOP conference. Many Republican lawmakers have largely accepted that their inability to govern is a predicament of their own making. They acknowledge that overcoming their legislative impasse relies not only on keeping control of the House in November, but also on growing their ranks significantly enough to neutralize the handful of hard-liners who wield influence by taking advantage of the narrow margins. But many also continue to say privately what few have acknowledged publicly: Republicans believe they are likely to lose the majority.

And members are also worried that some lawmakers who have already decided to leave will consider resigning early, threatening Republicans’ current majority. Former congressman Ken Buck (R-Colo.), who resigned after condemning how unserious his party has become, has hinted that several additional colleagues are mulling leaving before the new year.

“This is a dysfunctional place, and I’m not making an observation that others haven’t made,” Buck said.

Forty-three lawmakers, almost evenly split between both parties, won’t return to the House next year. While the number of retirements is on par with previous years, examining exactly which Republicans are retiring and how soon tells a more complex story.

Five of 21 retiring Republicans will have resigned before the end of the term. Four GOP committee chairs are leaving, but Republicans were particularly shocked at the announced departures of Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) and Gallagher, who are not term-limited from continuing to oversee their committees. Eight lawmakers are retiring from the coveted Energy and Commerce Committee and eight subcommittee chairs are leaving. Four former members of a different GOP leadership era also have called it quits: former speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), his trusted deputy Rep. Patrick T. McHenry (R-N.C.), former deputy whip Drew Ferguson (R-Ga.), and McMorris Rodgers, who previously served as conference chair.

Following the historic ouster of McCarthy last year and the difficulty governing afterward, several lawmakers — who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to freely discuss personal plans — seriously considered retiring. But what motivated these more pragmatic Republicans to seek reelection was the possibility that their absence could open up the seat to a candidate more willing to stonewall than govern.

In an interview with conservative commentator Charlie Kirk last month, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) acknowledged that the “big challenge right now is keeping the team together” and that early resignations don’t help Republicans in their mission “to save the country.”

“Without a Republican majority, we have no hope in doing that,” Johnson said. “We’ve got to be ready to govern, and we’re going to turn this mess around 180 degrees, but we’ve got to get through this difficult valley to get to that other side.”

The deep animosity and personal disdain between members following McCarthy’s ouster played a role in the decision of Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) to leave. Lesko announced her retirement in the middle of the three-week fight to elect Johnson, citing a desire to spend more time with family. But she added in her statement what many Republicans have echoed: “Right now, Washington, D.C., is broken; it is hard to get anything done.”

Rep. Greg Pence (R-Ind.) pointed to the “chaotic schedules” getting in the way of working in his district bordering Indianapolis. Like many who are leaving, Pence announced in January that he wouldn’t seek reelection after spending the holidays weighing the decision with family members, who became the main incentive for him to leave. How his colleagues had behaved in the months prior “didn’t incentivize” him to stay, he said.

Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-N.D.), who was elected in 2018 and has decided to run for governor, stressed that he’s never known “what normal is in Congress” after experiencing two impeachments against President Donald Trump, the coronavirus pandemic, and the Jan. 6insurrection. Gallagher, who was elected two years before Armstrong, echoed that sentiment, saying that while “Congress is getting increasingly chaotic,” it has “been pretty steadily chaotic during my eight years.”

Gallagher said he had always thought about serving eight years, a threshold he was just shy of when he and his wife decided that his time would be best spent growing their family. In an interview, the Wisconsin Republican said he also weighed whether he would make a bigger impact on the issues he cares about by continuing on the Hill or working in the private sector.

“I’ve seen people stay too long and make this their career. I didn’t want that,” he said. “It was like the Ghost of Christmas Future for me.”

Gallagher had decided to retire long before joining Buck and Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) in voting against impeaching Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, warning that impeaching the first Cabinet secretary in 150 years would open “Pandora’s box.”

He had already informed leadership by then that he wanted to resign early, and worked out a departure date that would allow for a special election, but not before the November election. Gallagher said he liked “going out on the idea of a high note,” ending his career on the Hill by chairing the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and spearheading the effort to pass a bill limiting the social media platform TikTok’s influence in the United States.

Increased intraparty tensions influenced Buck’s decision to resign and subsequently retire early last month. Many of his colleagues, however, blame him for contributing to the instability. The five-term congressman voted to oust McCarthy, arguing that the former speaker “didn’t keep his word” on working to significantly curtail spending. Buck ran for office in the tea party era when conservatives were passionate about reining in spending, and he said he believes the GOP has turned away from realistically trying to achieve those goals to instead focus on defending Trump and scoring political points.

“I think that the populist wave has eroded the conservative values that I had when I came to this place,” Buck said. “Now, we’re impeaching people like it’s some kind of carnival, and the Constitution is just a thing of the past to the very same people who were tea party patriots 10 to 12 years ago.”

Unlike members of the House Freedom Caucus — which Buck belonged to until they voted to kick him out last month — the Coloradan argued that pushing for ideologically pure legislation thwarts Republicans’ ability to actually land conservative wins, because “you have to have consensus in this building.” Buck said he has been most successful passing bipartisan legislation to reform how corporations deal with sexual assault and harassment claims, and raising awareness on big-tech antitrust legislation, calling it “ironic” that he “got a lot more good work done with the Democrats in charge than House Republicans in charge.”

Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), a six-term congressman who decided last term to retire this Congress so he could spend more time with his two young children, was quick to point out that Republicans have been able to govern, though admittedly with the help of Democrats. He pointed to a tax bill the House passed in January, which received overwhelming bipartisan support in the Ways and Means Committee he serves on. When it passed the committee, he turned to colleagues and said, “You know what, today, I think we did what [President Ronald] Reagan talked about, which was if I can get 80 percent of what I want, I’ll keep fighting for the other 20 later.”

“I think that mentality is lost on a lot of people serving in Congress today,” he said.

That desire to work together, whether within a majority party or across the aisle, is what Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-Ind.) said contributes to Congress being “misunderstood” by voters from both parties. He and several others set to retire said that Congress was built to make incremental changes but that lawmakers often promise immediate, large-scale reforms to voters in an effort to get elected. Bucshon noted that the divisions among Americans are reflected in the members sent to serve but added that it’s incumbent on members to inform constituents about what Congress can do for them incrementally rather than rally the base by overpromising.

“What I tell my constituents is … the government is a marathon, not a sprint. If you follow Congress closely, you will see incremental change. But it takes time because we’re trying to build consensus,” he said in an interview. “I think ultimately, the American people are going to hurt to the point where people that don’t want to accomplish things are gonna get voted out.”

But members of the far-right flank consider some of those retiring as traitors abandoning the fight. At a recent reelection rally for Freedom Caucus Chair Bob Good (R-Va.) in Scottsville, Va., Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) told voters to stop sending establishment politicians who are only “looking for the next job in Washington, D.C.” when they’re elected — a jab at retiring lawmakers who may end up working at lobbying firms or other influential Washington mainstays.

Those retiring do not necessarily blame hard-liners for the inability to achieve all the goals they wanted, including Bucshon, who hoped to lower the cost of health care and further address maternal mortality rates, and Gallagher and Wenstrup, who both wish more could have been done to return power from the executive branch back to Congress and the states. All are looking forward to helping their successors establish themselves on the Hill, with Pence hoping his “stays in touch with their constituents — and not just promote themselves,” a dig athard-liners in the far-right flank.

While the retirees mull their future, former congressman Chris Stewart (R-Utah), who retired last year to care for his ailing wife, had some words to impart to them when he returned to address the Congressional Gold Medal recipients last month.

“I want you to know: There’s not been a single morning that I woke up and thought, ‘Man, I wish I was back in Congress,’” he said to laughter.

Theodoric Meyer contributed to this report.

Marianna Sotomayor covers the House of Representatives for The Washington Post. Sotomayor joined The Post in 2021 from NBC News. Twitter


Earl said...

And a million hogs lined up to take their spot and sing whatever vulgar song is available just to be in the spot light. Also a million people lined up to give up every penny they have to uphold a winner take all, zero sum game economic system. Eventually perhaps they'll play the housing grift to the bone and you'll have four families living in each house so some pig somewhere doesn't have to work. Or perhaps they should just go ahead and make whole counties in every state "homeless counties."

Tina said...

Alot of them don't want a public sector or to fund the federal government. Some of them have good reasons and some of them don't. If they could control some of the bad behavior in some of these federal agencies then they would have less excuses to behave that way. Some of them simply want to hand power back to grifters and authoritarian figures in the states. Nothing is getting done while all this is happening so the saboteurs and obstructionists are getting their way. People need to get tired of conservative empty suits and get them all out of government. Send them back to the county commissions and the law firms from where they came. They're just there to shovel money to the rich which does nothing for the average person.

Terry said...

Heading for the exits because Republicans are coming with "Don't tread on me" flags and leaving with swastika armbands. The Tea Party bullshit was a just ruse to user in theocracy, far right governance, and right wing police state.