Thursday, December 01, 2016

Does JOE SAVIAK reflect Flagler College values on local government? (Historic City News)

Who gets the $5 cash per person that will be received to hear JOE SAVIAK's ukase?

Will there be protests?

Equal time for rebuttal?


Does Saviak reflect Flagler College view of local government


275-scott-saviakOn the heels of his failed efforts to overthrow the local mayor in the November General Election, Flagler College is publicizing an associate professor whose methods, at least in St Augustine local government, are highly suspect.
In addition to Flagler College distributing a “press release” earlier this year seeking unpaid publicity for a how-to guide being sold, for profit, that was co-authored by Joseph Saviak, the mammoth non-profit college is now selling tickets to hear Saviak lecture on “Reinventing Local Government for the 21st Century”.
Saviak teaches in Flagler’s Public Administration Program, working with students, many of whom are public sector employees serving in different local and state government agencies across the northeast and central Florida regions.
In the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew, whose damages St Johns County Administrator Michael Wanchick initially estimated may exceed $2 billion countywide, Saviak, acting as a self-appointed advocate for his Davis Shores neighborhood residents, sought immediate, priority relief from the City of St Augustine.
Saviak made false and misleading representations that St Augustine Mayor Nancy Shaver was “absent” during the hurricane and was therefore not doing her job as the chief elected official in local government. In fact, from before the time that Hurricane Matthew hit the beaches until after the nearly 10-foot storm surge rushed through the city streets taking everything in its path, Mayor Shaver was on 24-hour duty inside the St Johns County Emergency Management Center.
Saviak escalated his political rhetoric, claiming it was grounded in his years of experience and teachings at Flagler College, invoking the word of God to condemn the re-election of the local mayor. He wrote feverish endorsements for a virtually unknown contender, Kris Phillips. She had only built a home in the city limits this February, rarely if ever participated in city commission meetings, but was being supported by Davis Shores businessman and Seat 4 commissioner, Todd Neville, and others including the former mayor who was unseated by Shaver two years ago, and “dark money” from an anonymous out-of-town political action committee.
Saviak authored an anonymous Facebook page ostensibly to “discuss” holding the mayor accountable for her actions, but where he aggressively deleted public comments supporting the mayor’s actions and then blocked or banned further participation by those citizens who offered their support for Mayor Shaver.
It is not known if Joe Saviak is teaching the curriculum approved by Flagler College or if he has his own agenda. It is not clear if the College supports his false and deceptive campaign practices as part of the legitimate course of study for students interested in careers in public service.
However, after today’s announcement that Dr Joseph Joyner has been selected president of Flagler College, Saviak may be looking for new job – given his low opinion of Joyner’s suitability for the position.
In an e-mail received from Saviak wanting Historic City News to publish an investigative report trashing Joyner, which we did not do, Saviak said (in part):
  • Joyner resigned from the BOT so he would not be on the board picking him.
  • 3 people on the search committee have a clear conflict of interest
  • Frank Upchurch works for him
  • Mark Bailey’s firm is paid big $ as a vendor to the district
  • Tracy Upchurch’s wife works for him too
  • He has no higher Ed experience and no other college in America would pick a smaller county school superintendent.
  • When we refused to follow Saviak’s direction, he went to Folio Weekly, who published his story, unattributed, of course. But the words from Saviak’s e-mail to us are the same as those in the Folio article.
One thing is clear, Saviak is interjecting himself into the political process under color of credentials vested in him by Flagler College, and many readers have reported that they found that to be disturbing.
Last week, Sheriff-Elect Rick Staly in Flagler County named Saviak as the only resident of St Johns County to serve on Staly’s “transition team”.  Staley defeated Sheriff James Manfre in his bid for re-election. Many of the same questionable election tactics were employed in Staly’s election as were employed by Saviak in his failed campaign to defeat Mayor Shaver.
Saviak previously was chief of staff for Orange County Sheriff Kevin Beary, but he was fired after Beary aids say Saviak “snapped” when he failed to pass the Bar exam required to become an attorney in Florida.
Saviak challenged his failing grades by writing letters to the Florida Board of Bar Examiners and a Supreme Court justice on Sheriff’s Office stationery. In the letter to the Bar, Saviak told officials that they could be subject to “civil and criminal liability” if they did not act appropriately.

Lee Geanuleas · 
Sad that our local college is associated with and tarnished by Saviak's "unprofessorial" behavior. It's an unfortunate fact that our national elections are infected by the politics of personal destruction funded by dark money, but to have someone who is teaching students how our government works engage in such slimy vitriol is unhealthy for Flagler College and our local politics.
LikeReply28 minsEdited
Christopher McDermott
wonder why Flagler college has anything to do with this course?
LikeReply114 hrs
Historic City News
There is a ready source of tuition funding available to Florida residents applying for this B.S. degree program. So long as that remains the case, and they have angels like David Shoar who will send them dozens of new students every semester, then they can make money offering it.
LikeReply12 hrs
Thomas E. Cushman · 
Thanks for the insight.
LikeReply120 hrs
Historic City News
Our pleasure.
LikeReply12 hrs

HELP PROTECT OUR RETURNING RIGHT WHALES (SAR)

We need a St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore, which will help protect the winter calving grounds of our 350-500 North Atlantic Right Whales. Nothing says "NO" to offshore oil drilling louder than the words "protected area" in an Environmental Impact Statement -- the St. Augustine National Historical Park and National Seashore will protect from annihilation our endangered right whales (and other critters), as well as protecting and preserving our beaches, our history, our way of life, our jobs and tourist economy.


Posted November 29, 2016 06:18 am -
Updated November 29, 2016 06:47 am
By EMELIA HITCHNER emelia.hitchner@staugustine.com
Right whales face increasing risks, whale watchers needed



North Atlantic right whales will soon migrate to Northeast Florida for calving season, but with numbers hovering around the low 500s mark, sightings of the endangered species have become a rarity.

“They’re big animals, but there aren’t that many of them,” said Joy Hampp, program coordinator of the Marineland Right Whale Project. “It’s much harder to spot them than you think.”

Hampp said the monitoring and tracking of right whales relies almost entirely on reported sightings, making volunteer efforts a key component in the species’ survival.

“Because sightings are so few and the data is so important, the only way we are really going to be able to find the whales is to have as many eyes as possible on the ocean,” Hampp said.

Although the season won’t officially begin until the first week in January, Hampp said preparations to recruit and train volunteer whale watchers is already underway. Informational presentations aimed at new volunteers, surveyors and spotters begin next week, and a right whale survey training class will be held at the end of December.

This is the 17th season for the Marineland Right Whale Project, which now has about 200 volunteers spanning from St. Augustine Inlet to Ponce Inlet. Hampp said volunteers are usually required to patrol their sector once a week, with each patrol lasting a total of four hours across five designated points.

Sightings are immediately reported to the project, which then designates a trained team to photograph and identify the whales.

“We don’t have a good way at this point to physically attach satellite tags and track the whales like we can with other animals,” Hampp explained. “So we rely on mark recapture, which is photographing the whale and identifying their positions, that’s how we follow who is where and what’s going on.”

Northeast Florida is one of the only known calving grounds for the entire North Atlantic right whale population. The whales typically migrate into the area around December to give birth and then remain in Florida’s warm coastal waters as calves gain strength until February or March.

Hampp said conservation efforts have raised awareness in the general public, expanded critical habitat for right whales and placed enforcements on ship speeds. But despite those positive changes, right whale populations aren’t improving.

“Up until three years ago, the population was growing at two percent,” she said. “Now the habitat has changed and their migrations have changed. It’s getting harder to see where they’re going.”

Erin Handy, the Florida representative for Oceana, said right whales are facing increasing risks of ship strikes, entanglements and noise pollution, including from seismic testing. There are four seismic air gun blasting permits pending off the coast of Florida.

“If these permits are not denied, we will have seismic air gun ships in the water off our beaches in 2017,” Handy said. “The bottom line is that the sound from those blasts travels about 2,500 miles, so there’s no way for the whales to escape the sound.”

More immediate threats come in the form of ship strikes and entanglements. Handy said earlier this year, a calf was struck and killed by a ship before making it all the way north. According to research collected by a team of scientists for Oceana, 13 whales were struck by vessels from 2006 to 2010, resulting in five deaths and one serious injury.

Entanglements are even worse, Handy said.

From 2010 to 2015, entanglements in fishing nets or traps account for 85 percent of right whale deaths.

With so many dangers threatening to eliminate the species, Handy said volunteer involvement is critical in protecting the remaining right whales.

“It’s very expensive to do aerial monitoring, so when a citizen calls in a sighting, they’re able to help organizations use the limited funding they have to get crucial information,” Handy said. “They can know from the markings which whale it is, where it’s been and if it’s had a calf. That information is so important.”

Handy said she’s worried about the species’ survival, especially as the National Marine Fishery Service decides whether it will issue incidental harassment authorizations (IHA) to approve seismic testing permits.

“That means the company conducting the permits will have permission to disturb, injure or kill a certain number of marine mammals,” Handy said. “If they hit that number, they have to stop testing. The problem is, what’s the monitoring for that? If an animal is injured of killed, 9 times out of 10 they don’t wash ashore.”

Hampps agrees there’s a lot of speculation about the right whales’ future, but she’s still an optimist at heart.

“There are a lot more people looking and paying attention than there were 17 years ago,” she said.

She added that the more volunteers who participate, the more data gathering can occur for the small population.

“To participate in this is contributing to the conservation of this endangered species,” Hampp said. “That’s priceless.”

For more information on the right whale presentations or becoming a volunteer whale watcher, email Joy Hampp at marinelandrightwhale@gmail.com. To sign a petition against seismic testing or to learn about dangers to marine mammals, go to www.ocean.org.

BRAD KING: "Somebody's going to have to do something" on capital punishment (NSOF/Washington County News)




Article quotes longtime Florida Fifth Circuit State's Attorney BRAD KING, Michelle O'Connell special prosecutor.
BRADLEY KING was recently denied a Judicial Nominating Commission referral to Governor Scott for a soon-to-be-vacant Supreme Court seat.
The Supreme Court JNC questioned KING about the O'Connell case and capital punishment cases.
It is beyond peradventure or cavil that BRAD KING violated the O'Connell family's Article I, Section 21 right of access to a grand jury
His video response may be seen here: xxx
This article quotes KING on capital punishment in the 2017 Florida legislature:
"Somebody's going to have to do something," said Brad King, state attorney in the 5th Judicial Circuit."
How trite.
Most articulate words ever spoken by political special prosecutor who contends guns recoil forward?
BRAD KING was unable to give the precise number of death row inmates whose sentencing appeals post-Hurst decision will be before the Florida Supreme Court.
Perhaps 24-36?
BRAD KING won convictions and death sentences covering nearly 10% of all the 386 Florida death row inmates.
There are 381 men and five women on death row in Florida.
Are people in the Fifth Circuit that bad they must get death sentences relative to population?
Is BRAD KING just a mean-spirited energumen?

Lawmakers to again deal with death penalty sentencing


Friday
Posted Oct 21, 2016 at 11:40 AM
Updated Oct 21, 2016 at 11:40 AM

By Dara Kam | News Service of Florida
TALLAHASSEE, For the second year in a row, Florida lawmakers will attempt to fix the state's death-penalty sentencing scheme in response to court rulings finding that the process is unconstitutional.


Incoming Senate President Joe Negron, who will take over as head of the Senate after the November elections, told The News Service of Florida on Tuesday that lawmakers will have to redress the issue of jury unanimity, at the heart of rulings Friday by the Florida Supreme Court, when they reconvene next year.

"It's going to be a unanimous verdict requirement going forward," Negron, R-Stuart, said.

The court on Friday ruled that a statute, passed in March by lawmakers in response to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a case known as Hurst v. Florida, was unconstitutional "because it requires that only 10 jurors recommend death as opposed to the constitutionally required unanimous, twelve-member jury."

Last week's rulings left unanswered questions about the impact of the court decisions on Florida's 400 Death Row inmates. The state Supreme Court is expected to address the issue of retroactivity in other cases.

But Friday's decisions in two seminal cases --- the Hurst case, which had bounced back to the Florida court, and another involving convicted murderer Larry Darnell Perry --- made clear that the Florida justices believe a unanimous recommendation is required for the death penalty to be imposed.

Of 31 states that have the death penalty, Florida until Friday was one of just three --- along with Alabama and Delaware -- that did not require unanimous jury recommendations for sentences of death. Delaware's high court has put that state's death penalty on hold following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in January in the Hurst case.

There was "no ambiguity" in the Florida Supreme Court's ruling regarding the jury recommendation, Negron, a lawyer, said Tuesday.


"There's no gray area. There's no confusion. It's very clear. I think we should pass a constitutional statute," he said.

Florida's death penalty has essentially been on hold since January's 8-1 U.S. Supreme Court decision, which found that the state's system was an unconstitutional violation of the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury. That decision said Florida's system gave too much power to judges, instead of juries, in sentencing people to death.

The rulings Friday by the Florida Supreme Court dealt with an issue that the U.S. Supreme Court did not directly address --- the issue of jury unanimity in sentencing recommendations.

Negron said lawmakers do not need to rush to deal with the matter during a special session but could resolve it during the 2017 regular legislative session that begins in March.

But some lawyers were hoping that the Legislature would address the issue earlier.

In Ocala on Monday, Circuit Judge Robert Hodges put on hold the penalty portion of a murder trial, saying the court needed direction from the Legislature before proceeding.

"The effect of Perry is we have a bunch of cases that are now in limbo,” said 5th Judicial Circuit Public Defender Mike Graves, whose office represents Kelvin Lee Coleman and who argued Coleman's case Monday. A jury late last week found Coleman guilty of two counts of first-degree murder.


Attorney General Pam Bondi is expected to ask the Florida Supreme Court for a rehearing in either the Perry or Hurst cases. But court observers say it is highly unlikely the justices will grant a rare rehearing, especially given the 5-2 rulings in both cases.

If the court does not act, the Legislature must, lawyers on both sides agree.

"Somebody's going to have to do something," said Brad King, state attorney in the 5th Judicial Circuit.

Some judges are holding off on the sentencing phases of capital trials while proceeding with the portions of the trials to determine guilt or innocence.

But Friday's ruling on unanimity changes the landscape regarding jury selection because defense lawyers will now have to convince only a single juror to grant what is known as "mercy," a shift that could have a significant impact. Defense lawyers want the courts to pause until the unanimity issue is settled.

"While we don't know the final outcome of what the rules or laws will be, how are we expected to question a jury about it?" Graves, the public defender, said.

The issue of unanimity was a flashpoint during this year's legislative session as lawmakers grappled with changing the sentencing scheme after the U.S. Supreme Court decision. The Senate originally supported a proposal requiring unanimous recommendations for death to be imposed, but ceded to a House plan --- pushed by prosecutors, including Bondi --- favoring the 10-2 recommendations.

"Do we understand that we're responsible for that? Yes. We understand that. We understood that when we made that decision. But we thought that it was a position we should take in order to represent the victims' families and try to do the best we could for that group of people," said prosecutor King, whose circuit includes Citrus, Hernando, Marion, Lake and Sumter counties. "Yes. We're responsible for that. As much as anybody else is, it was us."

Abolish capital punishment -- moving outdoor evening service at Mission Nombre de Dios

Very moving service, with crime victims' families and friends opposing capital punishment.


Cities for Life event gives voice to those opposed to the death penalty






CHRISTINA.KELSO@STAUGUSTINE.COM People light 386 candles representing the lives of Florida’s 386 death-row inmates as they protest the use of the death penalty in a Cities for Life vigil held by the Diocese of St. Augustine at the Mission Nombre de Dios on Wednesday, November 30, 2016. 
More than 60 people shrugged off the threat of rain showers Wednesday night when they gathered outside at the Shrine at the Mission Nombre de Dios to say they wanted to see an end to the death penalty.
Those who came heard from a number of speakers, including Deacon Jason Roy who ministers daily to some of the 386 men and women currently sitting on Florida’s Death Row.
Others included Darlene Farah, who has been fighting with the 4th Judicial Circuit State Attorney’s Office, urging prosecutors there not to seek the death penalty in the case against the man accused of her daughter’s 2013 murder.
Herman Lindsey, who was sentenced to death in 2006 and exonerated in 2009, told his story, as did Deborah Jackson, whose husband, Kim Jackson, is currently sitting on Death Row.
Through the differing perspectives offered, a number of messages emerged including the assertion that the death penalty hurts far more people than it helps.
“The death penalty creates more victims,” Farah told those gathered in front of the podium.
She told a tale of the hurt and pain that her family has gone through after her daughter’s death and the realization that, if the death penalty is secured in the case against the man accused of her murder, they will be forced to relive it for decades to come as the case goes through the appeals process.
It was that appeals process that saved Lindsey, who called himself the Florida’s “23rd Death Row survivor.”
His case, he said, was the first in the state’s history to be thrown out with a unanimous decision from the Florida Supreme Court, who ruled that the evidence presented at his trial did not support a conviction.
After his conviction, Lindsey told those gathered that he “lost all faith,” but eventually came to the conclusion that, after his exoneration, he had to fight to end the death penalty.
“God takes us through things so he can use us in a certain way,” he said.
The one-hour event, co-hosted by the the Catholic Diocese of St. Augustine and Equal Justice USA, was called Cities for Life. It also featured music from the St. Augustine Chamber Singers, who sang during a candle lighting ceremony where those in attendance lit 386 candles representing each Death Row inmate.
Cities for Life is an effort that was started 15 years ago by the Rome-based Sant’Egidio Community as a movement to end the death penalty. Since it began, more than 2,000 cities throughout the world have declared themselves against executions, according to diocese spokeswoman Kathleen Bagg.
While local cities haven’t signed on, Bagg said parishioners started organizing the event locally last year. That first event was smaller than Wednesday evening’s, but, Bagg said, the anti-death penalty cause has grown in significance here since the Rev. Rene Robert, a local priest known for his opposition to the death penalty, was found shot to death in Georgia earlier this year.
Robert’s body was found in April in a remote area of Burke County, Georgia, days after he was reported missing by friends and family. Authorities say he was killed there by 28-year-old Steven James Murray, a man with an extensive criminal record, who, it is believed, met Robert through the priest’s active ministry devoted to serving the less fortunate, including those who had spent time in prison and jail.
Shortly after Murray was arrested and charged, Georgia district attorney Ashley Wright filed her intent to seek the death penalty in the case against him.
That troubled some who knew of Robert’s beliefs.
The issue was further compounded, at least for some, when a signed and notarized document was found in Robert’s file at the diocese that left virtually no doubt as to his wishes should he be killed. The Declaration of Life, as it is titled, said that if he were ever to fall victim to a violent crime, he would not want the death penalty sought against the person convicted of the crime.
That discovery prompted letters from the Most Rev. Felipe J. Estevez, bishop of St. Augustine, to the editor of The Record and to Wright herself, calling for an end to the “cycle of violence” perpetuated by the use of the death penalty.
Wright told The Record in a subsequent interview that such letters or even the decalration itself held no sway over her.
“My oath actually prohibits me from making decisions based on what the community demands or rejects,” she said.
The Rev. John Gillespie, pastor at San Sebastian Church, read a portion of his friend’s declaration Wednesday night.
As the ceremony drew to a close and the wind began extinguishing the candles behind him, Gillespie asked those who came to consider adding their signature to a petition asking Wright to revisit her decision to seek the death penalty in the case against Murray.
“I don’t think he wants it,” Gillespie said of Robert. “I do not want it. And I hope you agree.”
Posted December 1, 2016 06:46 am  

Welcoming New Flagler College President -- Dr. Joseph Joyner, Ed.D., SJC School Supt.

Flagler College needs a Mikhail Gorbachev.  I hope Dr. Joyner is a breath of fresh air in what Folio Weekly called "an ultra-conservative enclave of close-knit politicians and businessmen," lacking diversity, lacking tenure protection for faculty members and failing to honor and cherish academic freedom.

I hope Dr. Joyner becomes Flagler College's Gorbachev.

Let the Perestroika begin.

Posted December 1, 2016 12:01 am - Updated December 1, 2016 07:14 am
By EMELIA HITCHNER emelia.hitchner@staugustine.com
Change in leadership plan in place as Joyner is named next Flagler president

2 Comments


Joe Joyner might be the new face of leadership at Flagler College, but he’s certainly no stranger to the education realm.

The college’s board of trustees on Tuesday annointed Joyner — currently the superintendent of the St. Johns County School District — as the next president-to-be upon William Abare’s retirement in June. His name and that of one other were the finalists for the post from more than 170 national applicants.

“There were a lot of applicants with college president experience, so I certainly wasn’t expecting this,” Joyner said. “I already feel at home here, even after such a short period of time.”

Joyner will retire from his superintendent position after 13 years of service by the end of January. Under his tenure, the district has been at the top of the state for eight consecutive years and is one of only three A-rated school districts this year, along with Okaloosa and Sarasota counties.

He admitted it will be a change of pace, swapping the enormity of the school district’s 38,000 elementary, middle and high school students for a quaint 2,500 college students.

“But I love the idea of such a small college because you can get to know the students so much better,” he said.

Joyner will replace long-standing Abare, who will retire at the end of the 2016-2017 academic school year with 45 years of experience at Flagler, 15 of which he spent as president. Since the beginning of Abare’s presidency in 2001, Flagler has grown its student body and nearly doubled its number of full-time faculty members. Alumni increased from 6,000 to 16,000 and the college’s endowment and operating reserve funds, which serve as quasi-endowment, grew from $22 million to nearly $80 million.

Although he won’t officially begin his new role until the end of June, Joyner said he will begin building relationships around the college as he prepares to take the helm. He said his passion and energy for education did not end with his mandatory retirement from the school district and he’s eager to share those traits with Flagler.

For now, it’s all about observing.

“My first priority is to look, listen and learn,” Joyner said.

He added that he’s focused on providing a smooth transition for up-and-coming superintendent, Tim Forson, and that he will miss the close-knit community of district staff.

“I enjoyed every minute of my almost 14 years there. I will miss it dearly,” Joyner said. “But the good news is that I’m not moving away.”

As a former board of trustees member for the college, he feels confident the college’s strategic plan is similar to that of the school district. He said he feels well-prepared to fill the position, but he’s also open-minded about learning and gaining experience.

“I’m confident that I’m a quick learner and I will hit the ground running,” he said.

The details of Joyner’s contract with Flagler have not yet been discussed.

Comments
Blue Blood
http://www.flagler.edu/about-flagler/presidents-welcome/president/trustees.html

Transparency about as clear as a foggy London morning! Coincidentally, the school district's lawyer is the chairman of the Flagler College board of trustees? Conflict of interest, do your own research and decide. Here's the punch line, the newly appointed president is surprised - LOL.

45 minutes ago
Graham Martin
Are you saying that the man who ran the top rated school district in the state is somehow not qualified for his new position?

FPL gets undeserved rate increase


Posted November 30, 2016 05:05 am - Updated November 30, 2016 05:11 am
By Jim Saunders News Service of Florida
FPL customers to see higher electric bills

3 Comments
5 Share

TALLAHASSEE | State regulators Tuesday unanimously approved a settlement agreement that includes $811 million in base-rate increases for customers of Florida Power & Light — with $400 million slated to take effect Jan. 1.

FPL, which early this year proposed $1.3 billion in rate increases, negotiated the settlement with representatives of consumers and two business groups. The Florida Public Service Commission approved the agreement despite continuing objections from the senior-advocacy group AARP and the Sierra Club.

Commissioner Ronald Brise said the settlement addressed issues regulators heard from consumers during meetings across the areas served by FPL.

“One is that the quality of the [FPL] service is good. People were concerned about their pockets,’’ Brise said. “And I think ultimately, this settlement handles all of those things, and it allows for the service to continue in a way that people will continue to receive the satisfaction that they are looking for and that their pockets won’t be injured in the process, while allowing the growth that is necessary to occur.”

In addition to the $400 million increase slated to take effect Jan. 1, the agreement calls for a $211 million increase in January 2018 and a $200 million increase in mid-2019 when a new Okeechobee County power plant starts operating.

The settlement addresses numerous other issues, including potential solar-energy projects for FPL and a halt on a controversial financial practice known as “hedging” prices of natural gas. It also includes a target return on equity — a measure of profit — of 10.55 percent for FPL.

AARP argued in a filing last month that the utility’s rates should decrease by $300 million in 2017, not increase.

Earlier this year, the state Office of Public Counsel, which represents consumers, also argued that FPL’s rates should go down.

But the Office of Public Counsel ultimately reached the settlement with FPL, as did the Florida Retail Federation and the South Florida Hospital and Healthcare Association, which were parties in the rate case.

“In any given case, you have to evaluate the risks of you winning your positions and losing your positions,” state Public Counsel J.R. Kelly said after the vote Tuesday. “At the end of the day, we came together with the other signatories and Florida Power and Light, and we felt this was a reasonable resolution to all of the issues.”

Eric Silagy, president and chief executive officer of FPL, said the agreement will allow the utility to continue making “smart investments” that will help ensure relatively low bills for consumers and provide other benefits such as clean emissions from power plants. He said FPL has had the lowest electric bills in the state during the past several years and pointedly used that to address AARP’s objections.

But Jeff Johnson, AARP Florida’s state director, issued a statement calling the settlement approval “an early Christmas present for FPL.”

“Today’s decision demonstrates what observers of Florida utilities regulation have long believed — this system is simply not hearing the voices of residential consumers,” Johnson said. “Until this imbalance is addressed, the interests of Florida residential ratepayers will come last and those of out-of-state shareholders will come first.”

Base rates make up a major portion of electric customers’ monthly bills, with other portions involving costs such as power-plant fuel.

A common industry benchmark is a residential customer who uses 1,000 kilowatt hours of electricity a month. With the settlement approved Tuesday and other changes, such FPL customers will see their bills go from $91.56 to $99.02 in January, according to information from the utility. Those bills are estimated to go to $102.50 in January 2018 and $103.70 when the Okeechobee County plant starts operating, projected for June 2019.

The Public Service Commission spends months on base-rate cases, with staff members and commissioners wading through extensive financial and technical information and holding hearings — a process in the FPL case that Commissioner Jimmy Patronis likened to a “meat grinder.”

But the settlement agreement, announced in October, cut short some of the decisions regulators would have been forced to make about FPL’s original proposal for a larger rate increase.

Commission Chairwoman Julie Brown said the agreement will provide “predictability” for consumers.

“Taken as a whole, and given the amount of broad support across the customer groups that signed on, the settlement I do believe produces rates that are fair, just and reasonable and are clearly in the public interest,” Brown said.

Comments

Tom Reynolds
The state that could be the solar capitol of the world with the lowest prices in the world IS NOT !
ReplyShare+1

Jack (sponger) Harvell
Good thing everybody's employed according to the U-3 unemployment rate. No problem to absorb a 10% increase. Just ask your neighbors if they received a 10% wage increase this year, or in the last three years combined for that matter.
ReplyShare+1


nancy cross
this is terrible - of course it was unanimously approved - these utilities boards always rubber stamp increases. by the time they are through they will be hanging a 10 dollar amount increase on us per month. just terrible - so this jan our bills will be 5 dollars more at least. should not be allowed to do this.