In secret, behind locked gates, our Nation's Oldest City dumped a landfill in a lake (Old City Reservoir), while emitting sewage in our rivers and salt marsh. Organized citizens exposed and defeated pollution, racism and cronyism. We elected a new Mayor. We're transforming our City -- advanced citizenship. Ask questions. Make disclosures. Demand answers. Be involved. Expect democracy. Report and expose corruption. Smile! Help enact a St. Augustine National Park and Seashore. We shall overcome!
TRUMP "can't help it -- he was born with a silver foot in his mouth!" (as the late Texas Gov. Ann Richards said of President George H.W. Bush).
Rules for WITCH HUNT!: The Board Game
By Teddy Wayne
Mr. Wayne is the author, most recently, of “Loner.”
Image
CreditAndrew Kolb
OBJECT OF THE GAME: Despite overwhelming evidence of obstruction of justice and collusion with a foreign power (or three!), you must prove that the charges the Special Counsel brings against you are just a politically motivated WITCH HUNT! Fun for the whole crime family!
PLAYERS: You, the primary player; your main opponent, the dishonest Special Counsel; your secondary opponents, the Fake News Media and the nefarious Deep State; your teammates, who profess ignorance by looking away from the board; and 325 million spectators, a majority of whom are rooting against you.
PLAYING TIME: It should wrap up by whenever the next major holiday is. For a speed round, play while consuming a gallon of Diet Coke.
GAME PIECES: In addition to tokens for all the players, you have: a phone with the numbers of your three remaining “friends” who can still tolerate your ranting for 45 uninterrupted minutes about the WITCH HUNT!; a battery of lawyers “straight out of Central Casting” (for playing ridiculous, over-the-hill bumblers); one substitute token labeled “David Dennison.”
ADVERTISEMENT
PREPARATION: Months before gameplay starts, place foreign government cutout tokens facedown on the board in secret locations, hiding under each one a Quid Pro Quo card. When the Fake News Media overturns the cutouts, you must repeatedly set down more-acceptable-sounding Quid Pro Quo cards. The game officially begins after you use the Quid Pro Quo card that says “Nothingburger,” an untranslatable German word meaning “feigned indignation over completely damning evidence.”
SPECIAL COUNSEL: The pesky Special Counsel follows your token around the oval board in an attempt to prove obstruction of justice and collusion, but in doing so also stumbles upon a few hundred other crimes, including a nonfiction book proposal from you titled “If I Laundered Money Internationally for Years and That, Along With a Deeply Warped and Power-Hungry Psyche Forged by a Horrible Father — I Mean, Really Bad, Just, Like, the Worst, Aside From Me — Made Me Run for President.”
Image
CreditAndrew Kolb
GAMEPLAY: Place your token on your bedroom square, just in front of the TV symbol. You won’t move it much from this spot aside from a five-minute briefing session at which your teammates tell you everything’s going great to prevent you from coming up with “ideas for deals” and “a Mars force.” During the game, you’ll choose from the following actions:
DRAW A CARD FROM THE TWEETDECK: Pull a random Unfounded Exclamatory Accusation! card from the TweetDeck. Bonus points for Arbitrary Capitalizations, superfluous “quotation marks” and spelling erors that everyone has stopped mocking because it’s now more sad than funny; penalty for drawing the Self-Incriminating Statement card, which forces your lawyers to devise absurd excuses for it when they land on morning talk show squares. To prove you’re not merely an unhinged tyrant but also a family man, spend some quality time @ your wife’s government-designated Twitter handle.
“SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE” BOARD MASSACRE: After you reach the “S.N.L.” square, threaten to flip over the board and scatter all the pieces, but don’t actually do it, because your incredibly tolerant teammates may finally decide you’re too childish to play with again and also you’re sort of afraid of confrontation.
ROLL THE DICE ON NUCLEAR WAR: If you roll a seven or higher, mock the physical appearance of an enemy nuclear power’s unstable leader; six or lower, coyly say, “We’ll see what happens,” as if you actually understand geopolitical statecraft. If you succeed in goading the enemy into launching a nuclear attack on the board, the WITCH HUNT! will be immediately over!
Image
CreditAndrew Kolb
COMMUNITY RALLY CHEST: Pick a card from the Community Rally Chest with the name of a red state, place your token on it during a public entertainment event tailored to liberals, and spend an hour invoking the hallowed number 306, making racist statements that aren’t even thinly veiled, and stalking a few feet from the lectern after each screamed punch line to say to your teammates, “Wasn’t that great?”
WHEEL OF PARDON: To distract the spectators and signal to your teammates that they can break the rules of the game so long as they evince sufficient fealty, spin the Wheel of Pardon, which will always end up pointing to the worst person in the room.
Image
CreditAndrew Kolb
BUILD A HOTEL: For every hotel that you build on an undeveloped foreign square, give the owner of that square one Back-Room Political Favor chip. The hotel piece thus attains Accepted Collusion in Plain Sight status, making it ineligible for the Special Counsel’s WITCH HUNT!
ADVERTISEMENT
DECLARE BANKRUPTCY: You can’t declare bankruptcy, since the game started precisely because you already were bankrupt (financially and morally).
Image
CreditAndrew Kolb
ENDGAME: There are two possible conclusions: 1) You do not convince anyone that this is a WITCH HUNT! and your teammates send your token directly to jail; or 2) You do not convince anyone that this is a WITCH HUNT!, but your teammates, making a cynically calculated political bet, do not send your token directly to jail. In that case, congratulations, you have won WITCH HUNT!, defeating not only the Special Counsel, but the 325 million spectators, whom you thought of as losers all along!
Teddy Wayne (teddywayne.com) is the author, most recently, of “Loner.”
Our heroic Mayor of St. Augustine, Nancy Shaver, has earned another term. She defeated the formidable forces of corruption, defeating Mayor JOE BOLES in 2014 and trouncing other-directed Hate Radio station owner KRIS PHILLIPS in 2016. She is the only elected official in St. Johns County who publicly supports Justice for Michelle O'Connell. In 2016, Sheriff DAVID SHOAR dropped a money bomb on her; it fizzled, SHOAR fumed
Florida Supreme Court Justice Peggy Quince swears in Mayor NANCY SHAVER December 1, 2014, as her daughter holds the 1820 family Bible.
In the August 28, 2018 primary, you have a choice of three (3) candidates so far:
Mayor NANCY SHAVER, who is qualified, competent, compassionate and knows the value of a dollar. Mayor NANCY SHAVER values making fact-based decisions, without fear or favor -- that includes being a leader to help our Nation's Oldest City to:
end corruption,
solve mobility problems,
represent residents with wise decisions,
halt offshore oil drilling and sonic testing,
preserve our history,
protect our environment, and
adapt to global ocean level rise.
BILL McCLURE (hereafter "BM"), former one-term County Commissioner. Carpetbagging BM does not live in St. Augustine. BM has rented a two-bedroom apartment in a $129/night Marine Street tourist home. BMtold me earlier this year that he was running for County Commission, this time from Ponte Vedra. At the podium, I raised ethical questions after he spoke at County Commission on March 9, 2018 and gave his Crescent Beach residence address; later in the meeting, he gave a Ponte Vedra address. (Bumptious bumpkin businessman BM was lobbying at the March 9 meeting yet another special interest zoning variance, this one for his mother's proposed too-big rental house, opposed by environmentalist Bill Hamilton and other neighbors.
As one-term St. Johns County Commissioner, BM pushed for "incentives" for corporations -- Corporate Welfare. If BM were Mayor, would developers get "incentives," like they had a key to the back door at St. Augustine City Hall? Key questions about carpetbagging BM:
Is BM just "whistlin' Dixie" in his quixotic campaign?
BM claims support of the Tea Party (TP). Does TP know BM is a Corporate Welfare supporter, who supports millions of dollars in tax holidays ("incentives")? It's our money.
JACQUELINE ROCK (hereafter "JR"), a member of the Anastasia Mosquito Control Commission District Board and elected 2016 Bernie Sanders delegate to the Democratic National Convention. As an AMCD member, JR has missed meetings, arrived late, accomplishing nothing. She's a huge disappointment to her former supporters, including me. Arrogant JR angrily demands removal of St. Augustine's 1871/1879 monument to Confederate veterans. The City rejected her demand and a seven-person committee is working on plans to add words and images beneath it to contextualize it. This promotes healing. Acting like heels with hauteur, petty juvenile JR, et al. disrupted the opening November 2018 Nights of Lights event, elbowing and stepping on toes and irritably inveighing against monuments to dead soldiers. How gauche and louche.
As required by state law, JR has finally resigned to run, resigning from AMCD effective December 2, 2018. JR is spending May 29 to August 24, 2018 in Europe. JR's candidacy creates an August 28, 2018 primary for Mayor. Key questions to ask about absentee angry amateur JR:
Is JR supported by anyone other than her mentor, racist Rev. RONALD RAWLS, JR.?
is JR wasting your tax money ? She plans on taking $2000 ($500/month) for three (3) months when she will not attend meetings (June, July, August) and one for which there is no meeting (November). JR refused AMCD Commissioner Jeanne Moeller's reasonable request that she resign NOW. Taking $2000 for a no-show job? It's our money. Character counts. JR: resign now. Let citizens apply for the job.
Political tourists? Amateur hobbyists? While JR is playing "political tourist" and "activist" in Europe May 29 to August 24, a second political tourist, BM, has rented a room at 105 Marine Street (he also owns some five (5) residences). Does BM think this is "residency?" We know that our St. Augustine is now an international tourist destination, but we're flattered to have peripatetic politicians --political tourists -- pretending to run for Mayor. Everyone needs a hobby, especially amusing rich guys like BM, who has no ideas and is, well, at least, amusing. JR has no sense of humor and told me she wants a "revolution" if elections don't work. Both JR and BM are extremists. Both political hobbyists invoke François VI, Duc de La Rochefoucauld, Prince de Marcillac: "Hypocrisy is the compliment that vice pays to virtue."
Why this matters: If Mayor NANCY SHAVER receives 50%+1 of the votes in the August 28, 2018 Primary election, she is re-elected. It's the 453rd anniversary of the naming of St. Augustine by Pedro Menendez de Aviles, the day he first sighted it and named it on the Feast of Saint Augustine, named for an African bishop and pillar of the Roman Catholic faith. BOTTOM LINE: I support Mayor NANCY SHAVER: the ONLY qualified, competent, compassionate candidate. She has earned our trust and respect. We don't always agree, but I know that she's working for the people, not against us. This brilliant woman has shown that she has the grace to make our City a better place.
Snookered: City of Hollywood, Florida gave $28 million to developers. Shows why we need honest elected officials who do their homework, not other-directed Commissioners who grant subsidies without knowing what their doing.
Margaritaville was a pivotal deal for Hollywood, but some who decided its fate now say they had no idea it required giving away millions in taxpayer money.
Critics are asking how they could be so clueless, but the commissioners say they weren’t given the whole story. And they may be partly right.
The documents that changed a $10 million loan into a more than $20 million grant used an obscure term that wasn’t clear — and the people charged with explaining the change were just as unclear, recordings of the meetings show.
“At the time, they were more worried about whether it would be built, and what it would take to get the project built,” Hollywood spokeswoman Raelin Storey said. “There was not a lot of discussion back then that this was a loan that would become a grant.”
Two different commissions approved different versions of the deal years ago, perhaps leading to the confusion.
At public presentations at City Hall where key votes were cast in September 2012 and May 2013, city leaders failed to publicly spell out the changes. And they didn’t spell it out behind the scenes either, Commissioner Peter Hernandez said.
“When I had meetings with them, no one said this is going to be a $28 million giveaway,” Hernandez said. “That was not clear.”
There’s even confusion over whether the grant was $23 million or $28 million.
The city’s original request for proposals stipulated that the developer pay for street improvements. But in the end, Hollywood paid the developer $5 million for making those improvements, saying the Community Redevelopment Agency would have made them on its own anyway.
Today, city administrators argue that the developer was given $23 million. Others, including Hernandez, say the true figure is $28 million.
Questions remain as to whether the commissioners read the contract they were voting on. Three of the seven commissioners who voted on the deal in 2012 said they read the whole agreement. Two said they don’t remember and two couldn’t be reached for comment.
Two of the seven commissioners who voted on the deal in 2013 said they read the entire agreement — and one said he did not. Three said they don’t remember. One couldn’t be reached for comment.
Hernandez, the only commissioner to vote against the entire contract, admits to not reading the entire 194-page document that cemented the deal.
“I read what I thought was important, and it didn’t make any financial sense to the city,” he said. “Some of the terms are legalese. And I’m not an attorney.”
In addition, city officials used a term that doesn’t exactly bring to mind the word “grant”: compensated funding.
“What is compensated funding?” Hernandez said. “What does that mean? I think they came up with a term like that to keep people in the dark. There’s no question in my mind that this was intentional.”
‘Duped’ by deal
Commissioner Traci Callari could not be reached for comment but said publicly that she felt duped.
Commissioner Linda Sherwood said she read the entire contract, but the word “grant” never came up.
“I did ask how we were getting the money back, and they told me about the increase in rent” — from $500,000 a year to $1 million, Sherwood said. “We were not aware at the time that it was going to be a grant. I thought it was going to be a loan. And it did not say ‘grant’ in the contract.”
Other commissioners said they were aware of the giveaway because they met individually with city administrators out of the public eye.
Jorge Camejo, executive director of the CRA, was one of the key players to negotiate the deal. He says it’s not fair to ask who knew and who didn’t after so many years have passed.
The issue came to light after the Margaritaville resort was sold to a private equity firm in mid-April. The property sold for $190 million.
Because the resort sits on city-owned land, Hollywood commissioners were required to approve the sale. At their meeting on April 18, Callari, Hernandez and Sherwood said they thought the millions dedicated to the project were a loan all along, not a grant.
City Hall has scheduled a workshop for 10 a.m. May 30 to explain the complicated deal. The public is welcome, but because it’s a workshop, they won’t be able to ask questions.
“The city/CRA is currently getting more than twice the amount of money in the first few years of this resort being opened than the city’s financial analyst estimated in the form of more tax revenue and more rent,” Storey said in an email on Saturday. “This is due to both the incredible profitability of the resort and the increased value of the property.”
‘Hard for me to remember’
The $10 million loan turned into a much larger grant on Sept. 5, 2012, when a former commission approved the change by a 5-2 vote.
At the meeting, then-City Manager Cathy Swanson-Rivenbark told the commissioners the original plan called for the city to kick in a $10 million loan plus $5 million for improvements to Johnson and Michigan streets. But the new proposal required an additional $13 million toward construction costs, bringing the total to $28 million.
The public investment would be repaid in 15 years through a compensated funding agreement, she told commissioners.
“Whether you call it a compensated funding agreement or you call it a grant, that pays you back much more than what you put in,” she said.
Later in the meeting, a slide did mention the word grant, asking, “Can the CRA afford the $23 million grant?” That slide was up for 40 seconds. It was not used during the May 2013 meeting.
Hollywood claims it could make an estimated $1.9 billion over the 99-year lease, including $498.5 million in base rent and $193.1 million in taxes.
Former commissioners Beam Furr and Fran Russo voted no on the deal.
Furr, now mayor of Broward County, doesn’t recall the $13 million construction grant but says he does remember reading the entire contract.
He also says he remembers the taxpayer money earmarked for Margaritaville switching from a loan to a grant. Furr says he was the one who suggested the developer pay double the rent so Hollywood could get its money back quicker.
“I think it was behind the scenes,” Furr said. “That was my suggestion to the city manager.”
Fran Russo and Heidi O’Sheehan, former commissioners who voted for the deal in 2012, could not be reached for comment.
Commissioner Dick Blattner, who voted for the deal in both 2012 and 2013, says he can’t recall whether he read the full document.
“That was five, six years ago,” he said.
Patty Asseff, who was also on the commission for both key votes, says she can’t remember whether she read the contract, either.
“It’s hard for me to remember back to 2013,” she said. “[The developer] came to the city to ask for a $10 million grant to buy the furniture. It was a grant that started out as a loan. And the other $5 million was to redo Johnson street and Michigan. I don’t remember the $13 million [construction grant]. It’s been a long time.”
Peter Bober, mayor at the time, defended the city administrators who negotiated the deal.
“Margaritaville is one of the best financial deals with the city in recent history,” he said. “I have always described it as a business deal. We get tax revenue. We get rent money. We participate in the success based on the profits.”
Bober says he was well aware of the grant aspect of the deal.
“I never understood this as a classic loan,” he said. “We were making an investment. We were putting money in to get money back. And it did that.”
Skipping over a key detail
A final vote came on May 29, 2013, several months after three new commissioners joined the seven-member board: Callari, Hernandez and Kevin Biederman.
At the meeting, Swanson-Rivenbark skipped past a Powerpoint slide about the compensated funding agreement, saying Camejo would explain it later. But he never did.
He says he can’t recall why.
“I certainly didn’t do it intentionally,” he said. “I don’t think there was any intentional effort to mislead anyone.”
Jeff Sheffel, the former city attorney who helped draft the contract, said commissioners should have known what they were voting on even though Swanson-Rivenbark and Camejo neglected to shine a spotlight on the grant aspect during those two key public meetings.
“We had one-on-one briefings with every single one of those commissioners, where we went through everything with them,” he said. “We were giving [the developer] this money and it was no longer a loan.”
Camejo argued that it doesn’t matter if the term used in place of “grant” was not clear.
“It doesn’t matter what you call it,” he said. “It’s silly to ask why [we] didn’t call it something else.”
Hernandez and Callari voted against the agreement that dedicated millions in taxpayer money to the project.
Hernandez alone voted against the lease and development agreement, saying it was a bad deal for the city.
“I definitely didn’t get the whole story,” Hernandez said. “None of us did. It was not being told to us and it was definitely not being told to the public.”
Hernandez said if it was such a good deal for the taxpayers, city leaders should have gone out of their way to make things clear to them.
“We’re giving away their money,” he said. “We are subsidizing 56 years of rent.”
Biederman sees the taxpayer money as an investment and dismissed concerns about the odd “compensated funding” phrasing.
“Twenty years ago, nobody knew what a tweet was either,” he said.
Biederman says he can’t recall whether he read the entire contract five years ago, but thinks he did.
“I understood completely we were not getting the [money] back directly,” he said. “We were getting it back through enhanced rent and [property taxes].”
Margaritaville timeline
July 30, 2009: Hollywood requests bids to build a hotel resort on the 5-acre city-owned parcel at Johnson Street and the Broadwalk
April 2010: Commission chooses Margaritaville proposal over Planet Hollywood.
July 2010: Hollywood outlines a finance plan for Margaritaville that includes a $10 million loan from the city's Community Redevelopment Agency to be repaid in 10 years at 5 percent interest.
January 2011: Hollywood commissioners approve 99-year lease with Margaritaville. The city will be paid $500,000 a year, with a 3 percent increase annually.
September 5, 2012: Commission approves an agreement with Margaritaville that effectively turns a $10 million loan into a $23 million grant, with another $5 million going toward street improvements. In return, the developer agrees to a 99-year lease, with yearly rent payments increasing from $500,000 to $1 million a year.
November 2012: Three new members are elected to the commission: Kevin Biederman, Traci Callari and Peter Hernandez. They join Mayor Peter Bober and Commissioners Patty Asseff, Dick Blattner and Linda Sherwood.
May 29, 2013: Commission approves an amended agreement that acknowledges Starwood Capital as a partner with developer Lon Tabatchnick and Margaritaville. Rent increases are built into the lease, with payments increasing by 15 percent every five years.
November 14, 2015: The Margaritaville Hollywood Beach Resort celebrates its grand opening with a concert by Jimmy Buffett
November 2016: The Hollywood commission changes again, with Josh Levy winning the mayor’s race and Debra Case elected to District 1 seat
April 12, 2018: The Margaritaville resort is sold to private equity firm KLS Capital Partners for $190 million
April 18, 2018: Hollywood commissioners approve sale of the resort 6-1, with Hernandez voting no.
June 12, 2018: Deadline for Hollywood to determine whether taxpayers are owed money on profits from Margaritaville sale.
