St. Augustine Record photo taken Friday, September 16, 2016 -- what is the object that LOUIS JOHN ARBIZZANI placed on the second floor balcony? Is it going to harm the Victorian woodwork against which it is leaning?
Demolish or preserve? 32 Granada St., voted a local landmark, could still face wrecking ball
Posted: September 18, 2016 - 10:48pm | Updated: September 18, 2016 - 11:02pm
By SHELDON GARDNER
sheldon.gardner@staugustine.com
St. Augustine’s Historic Architectural Review Board voted last week to make a property a local landmark, but they still could decide to allow its demolition.
The property at 32 Granada St. was home to notable residents including artist Antonio Vedovelli, according to backup materials.
Vedovelli’s work was shown in New York in 1945, according to a previous St. Augustine Record report. Articles about Vedovelli, who died in 1953, ran in Newsweek and Art Digest, according to a book called “Reflections” by Garry Libby, which the city shows in its backup materials.
That history was part of the reason for the landmark status vote, as the board is still hashing out whether to allow its demolition.
Without designating the structure as a local landmark, the board would not have authority to deny the demolition, Jenny Wolfe, city historic preservation officer, said at the meeting.
“The board ... found that it was significant at least on three criteria, and that is for the people ... as well as its architectural style and the association with the local art community,” Wolfe told The Record.
Board member Antoinette Wallace said the architecture is significant. The city lists it as a Frame Vernacular that “reflects a Folk Victorian style.”
“Authenticity of our city is very important and one by one this fabric is disappearing,” said board member Wallace.
L. John Arbizzani applied to have the property, a house built around the turn of the 20th century, demolished so that he can build a single family home, according to the staff report.
The board is expected to vote on the demolition application on Oct. 20, which will give board members time to consider evidence presented on the economic hardship.
The costs of renovating and relocating the building have been cited as part of the hardship, Wolfe said. An extensive report has been filed by the applicant on the property and the hardship.
When considering applications for demolition, the board looks at the significance of the structure, Wolfe said. But the board with their action can’t “create an undue economic hardship.”
The old St. Augustine Record building and the old waterworks building are other landmarks. That’s about the same level of significance as local properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places, of which there are about 30.
But the local landmark designation is solely a HARB decision, said David Birchim, planning and building department director.
That said, the property owner can appeal the landmark designation to the City Commission, Birchim said. An application had not been filed as of Friday.
According to backup materials from the city, “Local ‘historical landmarks’ are defined as a building, object, site or structure of the highest historical, architectural, cultural or archaeological importance and whose demolition, removal, relocation, or alteration would constitute an irreplaceable loss to the character and quality of the city.”
No comments:
Post a Comment