Sunday, February 05, 2017

BEACH FARMER'S MARKET UPDATE: County Administrator WANCHICK Dropped Bomb, then SABCA President JONES Dropped Ball On Farmer's Market


Last month, in a St. Augustine Record Guest Editorial and on this blog, I reported St. Johns County Administrator MICHAEL DAVID WANCHICK's December 1, 2016 letter to St. Augustine Beach Civic Association WILLIAM JONES, ukase purporting to the Wednesday morning St. Johns County Ocean Fishing Pier Farmer's Market this summer.
This decision was  kept secret for six weeks by the County and St. Augustine Beach Civic Association.
WANCHICK dropped the bomb.
JONES kept it secret.
For some six weeks.
Dumb kluck.
WANCHICK violated Due Process rights to notice and an opportunity to be heard of some 80 vendors and their families, who depend upon weekly earnings from the wonderful local gathering, which has become a popular tourist attraction.
Two dozen people spoke out against this outrage at the St. Johns County Commission meeting on January 17, 2017.  I was one of them.
The matter is on the agenda for the St. Augustine Beach City Commssion for Monday, February 6,  2017 at 6 PM.
It will also be on a future County Commission agenda.
Predictions:
1. St. Johns County Administrator MICHAEL DAVID WANCHICK won't get away with attempting to end the Wednesday Beach Farmer's Market at Pier Park -- no one supports him and he was nearly fired,  3-2 at the January 17, 2017 meeting..
2. St. Augustine Beach Civic Association President WILLIAM JONES won't get away with his twisted attempts to bully First Amendment protected activity and to euchre St. Augustine Beach City Commission to vote a "resolution" endorsing SABCA (as opposed to the vendors themselves), that would eliminate procedural safeguards for contracting like Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, audits, which SABCA seeks to avoid.
3. We in the "reality-based community" will not be misled.
4. Farmer's Market vendors will no longer be kept in the dark treated as strangers in the County's lease contract terms (currently there is a clause saying there are "no third party beneficiaries," depriving them of legal rights to notice and the right to rely upon contract terms.
5. Farmers' Market vendors and other tourism worker rights will be respected and not neglected.
6. Lease contracts will be enforced, utilities will be paid, cash-only, no-recept collection of weekly vendor fees will end and an audit and investigation will ensue -- we have a Right to Know.  It's our government and our county park.  SABCA may even stop charging vendors extra money for parking without contractual right to do so.  SABCA may also stop discouraging vendors from taking EBT.
7. Messrs. WANCHICK and JONES will bear near-equal responsibility for this cluster-kluck.  Will they be investigated by an outside agency?  Will they and their lawyers be hearing from the FBI Corruption Task Force?  Will we finally get an Inspector General and Ombuds in St. Johns County?

Background here:

http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/01/ed-slavin-guest-editorial-political.html
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/01/county-administrator-ends-pier-parking.html
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/01/future-undecided-for-st-augustine-beach.html
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/01/george-gardners-st-augustine-report.html
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/01/sabca-finally-organizes-to-save.html
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/01/sabca-president-attacks-first-amendment.html
http://cleanupcityofstaugustine.blogspot.com/2017/02/tortfeasor-william-jones-sabca-use.html


February 5, 1992: 25 years ago today in The New York Times

It was 25 years ago this morning that I woke up in Washington, D.C. and read The New York Times article by Matt Wald about my client, C.D. "Bud" Varnadore, who filed the first-ever environmental whistleblower case against Oak Ridge, Tennessee nuclear weapons plant operators.

Oak Ridge Natonal Laboratory and the Department of Energy operations in Oak Ridge, Tennessee would never be the same again.

Mr. Varnadore's protected activity, and that of other ethical employees, helped make conditions more humane.

As The New York Times obituary pointed out (August 5, 2013), Mr. Varnadore's courage helped transform the culture of nuclear weapons plants.

Pollution and bullying of ethical "whistleblower" employees was rampant. Environmental concern were treated disdainfully by a culture of corruption fostered by the Department of Energy and rapacious government contractors like Lockheed Martin, Martin Marietta and Union Carbide.

Bullies hide behind the skirts of tepid local newspapers in places like Oak Ridge, Tennessee, knowing that they cower to power and lack resources and skills for investigative reporting. They often hire newspaper reporters as PR misters.  Sometimes bullies threaten bribe or blackmail reporters and editors.

Thankfully, The New York Times' courageous reporters are still on the job, as demonstrated by its reporting on President DONALD JOHN TRUMP, still afflicting the comfortable nad comforting the affilcted. That's what unaccountable St. Johns County Sheriff DAVID B. SHOAR learned when he read The New York Times on November 24, 2013 ("Two Gunshots on a Summer Night," by Walt Bogdanich and Glenn Silber, also a PBS Frontline program, "A Death in St. Augustine, November 26, 2013).

Just as the nuclear weapons complex was transformed, so too are we transforming St. Augustine and St. Johns County today.

Yes we can!

"I GOT THIS": Three cheers for six federal courts on TRUMP's illegal orders.

Saturday, February 04, 2017

MARRIOTT & "PARTNER" KANTI PATEL: Produce data, not "warm fuzzies" on SAN MARCO HOTEL PUD

E-mail sent to MARRIOTT's Senior Design Director:


-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Slavin
To: Steve.Nelson
Cc: edward.ryan ; corporate.ethics ; architectureandconstruction ; john.casey ; jameswhitehouse ; dburnett ; sagresta ; jcblow ; gmisterly ; matthew.shaffer ; coacathy ; longdella24 ; dgalambos
Sent: Sat, Feb 4, 2017 2:07 pm
Subject: SAN MARCO HOTEL PUD: Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine, Florida -- Proposed Deletion of Underground Parking Would Create A Public Nuisance and Embarrass Marriott (San Marco Hotel)

Dear Mr. Nelson:
1. Since you never calledpursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, I referred to Marriott's General Counsel and its Board of Directors Audit Committee the issue of the developer's counsel's lack of candor with the Planning and Zoning Board on the San Marco Hotel PUD major modification.
2. The applicant KANTI PATEL's October 21, 2015 Development Plan Narrative states that the property in quo "does not have any constraints related to topography or soil conditions."  (page 4, emphases added).  No scientific evidence contradicts this legally binding admission.  
3. No, Mr. Nelson, "complete faith" in misstatements is neither desired nor required.  Vague assurances are meaningless.  Seeking to delete underground parking is unacceptable.  Have you viewed the PZB video yet?  www.cosatv.com ;
4. The developer demands to eviscerate our San Marco Hotel Planned Unit Development Ordinance, St. Augustine City Ordinance No. 2006-16, by deleting underground parking.  Underground parking is a legal commitment that the developer requested, sought and signed, and to which he agreed to be legally "bound."  Why does he want to delete underground parking?  Is Marriott aware of this major modification request?  Does Marriott -- and the Marriott family -- endorse it? Have Marriott Board members, including former presidential candidate Willard Mitt Romney, been informed of this indecent demand by the developer of the Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine?
5. Will you and a Marriott lawyer be here in St. Augustine at the PZB meeting on Tuesday, February 7, 2017 at 2 PM?
6. If so please bring data, not "warm fuzzies" (as professional engineers would call them).  Please note that responses to my records requests nos. 2017-30,31,32,33,34,35,36 & 42 will likely shed more light. Don't be surprised if there are more data gaps and credibility problems uncovered.
7. I look forward to meeting with you, Mr. Nelson, and to showing you our City of St. Augustine, of which we are all justly proud.
Thank you.
With kindest regards, I am,
Sincerely yours,
Ed Slavin
904-377-4998


-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Steve <Steve.Nelson@marriott.com>
To: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 1, 2017 3:30 pm
Subject: RE: Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine, Florida -- Proposed Deletion of Underground Parking Would Create A Public Nuisance and Embarrass Marriott

Mr. Slavin, I am in receipt of your advice from last Friday, and while I can appreciate your position, I would like you to know that Marriott International has complete (sic) faith (sic) in our partners to work through favorable resolution of matters such as this.
 
Owner-Operators like Jalaram Hotels Inc. and Greenwood Hospitality are amongst the best in the business, and in talking separately with both Mr. Patel and Mr. Conran, you can rest assured that any concerns you have now, are being addressed now or in the future.
 
Ownership has a promise to Marriott International, and I assure you that no one has anything to gain, and everything to lose, if your great city was to be harmfully impacted by this hotel in any way.
 
Regards,
Steve
 
From: Ed Slavin [mailto:easlavin@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 2:21 PM
To: Nelson, Steve
Cc: Casey, John
Subject: Re: Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine, Florida -- Proposed Deletion of Underground Parking Would Create A Public Nuisance and Embarrass Marriott
 
Dear Mr. Nelson:
Are you available to discuss this project, and objectionable deletion of underground parking, perhaps by telephone tomorrow?
Thank you.
With kindest regards, I am,
Sincerely yours,
Ed Slavin
904-377-4998
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Casey, John <John.Casey@marriott.com>
To: Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com>
Cc: Nelson, Steve <Steve.Nelson@marriott.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 27, 2017 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine, Florida -- Proposed Deletion of Underground Parking Would Create A Public Nuisance and Embarrass Marriott
Steve: the bellow is in regard to the St. Augustine RH. For you!

John D Casey, AIA 
Marriott International 
Director, Design and Project Management
Lifestyle brands
202-907-7453

On Jan 27, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Ed Slavin <easlavin@aol.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Casey:
1. Thank you for your assistance in referring me to your colleague who now supervises the Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine, Florida project.
2. Is Marriott aware of the implications of the proposed deletion of underground parking from the Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine?
3. It would require making deliveries and removing garbage with carts on our crowded city sidewalks, rather than moving them underground.  
4. It would clog our already narrow, overcrowded streets with automobiles seeking surface valet parking. 
5. Has Marriott attempted to simulate the narrow turning radius for the valet parking circle at the proposed redesigned hotel, without underground parking?  It appears that it would be impossible for normal sized automobiles to turn around without difficult in the space provided.
6. Constructing the Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine hotel without underground parking and inadequate surface parking would present a public nuisance, eviscerating our Nation's Oldest City's historic area, ruining HP-5 district as a "buffer" between residential and commercial uses.
7. While deleting underground parking might save Mr. Patel money, the costs are not worth it.  Deleting underground parking would reduce mobility in our Nation's Oldest City and hurt Marriott's brand.  Mobility is one of the most serious problems in our very small City, which is being addressed by consultants.
8. I look forward to Marriott opening this magnificent hotel, with underground parking, as legally required by the Planned Unit Development ordinance, which was drafted after two years of hearings before our City Planning and Zoning Board, our Historic Architectural Review Board, and our City Commission.
9. Please direct the  Marriott Renaissance St. Augustine developer, Mr. Kanti Patel, to stick with his legally binding commitment to underground parking, which has already proven a success at his Bayfront Hilton, surviving Hurricane Matthew without flooding.
10. Would Marriott kindly speak with Mr. Patel?   Perhaps one of your colleagues could attend our City of St. Augustine PZB on February 7, 2017.
Thank you.
With kindest regards, I am,
Sincerely yours,
Ed Slavin
904-377-4998
 

Will HP-5 District Be Devoured by KANTI PATEL and expanding Marriott Renaissance project?

By Capt. Lee Geanuleas, U.S.N. (Ret)., St. Augustine Residents Count:

"PUD-DING away" a historic preservation district? We may need our Vision tested. 
The picture below shows the boundaries of the Historic Preservation District 5 (HP-5) and the property currently owned by hotel developer Kanti Patel and property in HP-5 Mr. Patel has either made an offer to buy or in which he has expressed an interest. 
The scarlet colored block on the right end of the W. Castillo Dr. /Grove Ave block was taken out of HP-5 in 2006 when Mr. Patel was granted a planned unit development (PUD) for a four story hotel with underground parking. That decision reduced HP-5 by about 15%. 
Now, 11 years later, Mr. Patel tells the city that he just learned that "underground site issues" preclude the underground garage and since he recently bought the Barnacle Bill's restaurant next to the hotel PUD and its satellite parking lot (pink blocks), he would like to rezone those parcels out of HP-5 and into his hotel PUD for use as hotel valet parking lots.
Mr. Patel's request to rezone Barnacle Bill's will be considered by the Planning & Zoning Board this 2:00 PM Tuesday, Feb 7th at the Willie Galimore Center (399 Riberia St). If approved, that will remove about 6% from what's left of the HP-5 district. Yikes! 
Mr. Patel also owns the old Chamber of Commerce building lot at the west end of W. Castillo (brownish block) and made an offer (so far unsuccessful) to buy the 0.43 acre lot next door. He's a hotel developer, so it's unlikely he wants to own these lots just to own them. It's more likely he has a plan for those properties on the west end of W. Castillo. 
HP-5 contains 13 historic houses which are "Contributing Structures" to the North City National Register Historic District (NRHD). HP-5 was created to serve as protection for those lovely homes and as a buffer to the North City NRHD. 
If the city rips another 6% out of HP-5, then it will have reduced HP-5 by about 20%. At that point, is it still a viable and sustainable HP district? What do you think will happen to the rest of the district, particularly since that same developer owns another property in the same district? What happens to residential properties on Grove Ave and north of Grove in the North City NRHD? 
St Augustine is a city that CLAIMS it values its history and seeks authenticity (2014 City Vision Document). If the city dismantles an Historic Preservation District for the convenience and benefit of a developer, what does that say about that claim? What's our true vision? 
If you want the city to support its published vision, please come out and share your thoughts with the PZB next Tuesday at 2:00 PM (Willie Galimore Center).

Rising Tides Could Swamp President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago "Winter White House": Experts




Rising seas could swamp Trump’s ‘Winter White House’ at Mar-a-Lago, scientists say

By Skyler Swisher
Sun Sentinel

If scientists are right, rising seas will one day swamp the "Winter White House," part-time home to a president who has labeled climate change a hoax.

President Donald Trump has said he's "not a believer in man-made global warming." Less than an hour after he became president, most references to climate change disappeared from the official White House website.

But people like Palm Beach County Commissioner Steven Abrams, a Republican, say Trump should seriously consider the risks to his prized waterfront property, the Mar-a-Lago club and resort in Palm Beach, where he is spending this weekend.

"Even though he's president, Mar-a-Lago is not invulnerable to sea level rise," Abrams said.

Trump's views on global warming conflict with worst-case scenarios from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which projects sea levels rising by more than 6 feet by the end of the century. At that level, the sea would swallow up a portion of Mar-a-Lago, along with surrounding properties in Palm Beach.

Harold Wanless, chairman of the geological sciences department at the University of Miami, said he thinks that models underestimate sea level rise and that Trump's property could be threatened even sooner. The 20-acre estate is nestled between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean.

As the ocean rises, Mar-a-Lago will become more vulnerable to seasonal king tides, coastal erosion and storm surge. Wanless said he expects most of South Florida's barrier islands will become uninhabitable by the middle of the century as roads and sewage systems are swamped by the rising waters.

Trump golf club loses legal fight over memberships
Trump golf club loses legal fight over memberships
"The flooding will become so frequent on barrier islands it will become an unacceptable risk," he said.

Wanless and nine other Florida scientists sent a letter in December to Mar-a-Lago requesting a meeting with Trump on climate change.

"Many of Florida's waterfront properties (including yours) are vulnerable to even minor increases in sea level because of erosion and storm surge," they wrote. "This is not a distant threat. Climate change is making an impact today."

There are already areas where oceanfront homes and condominiums, particularly in lower-lying Miami-Dade and Broward counties, will become unlivable and unsellable within a 30-year period, the length of a common mortgage, because of sea level rise, Wanless said.

Trump has taken a different tone in his public statements. He famously tweeted in 2012 that the Chinese created global warming to hurt U.S. manufacturing.

But as a businessman, Trump also moved to protect a golf course in Ireland against the projected effects of climate change. In a meeting with reporters and editors at The New York Times after the election, Trump said there may be "some connectivity" between human activity and climate change.

He also said he would keep an "open mind" on keeping the United States in the Paris climate agreement, which has been signed by more than 174 countries and seeks to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit). The agreement requires countries present national plans on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While targets are not legally binding, participants must report their emissions and progress on meeting goals.

In South Florida, both Republicans and Democrats have acted on climate change, putting millions into improving drainage, elevating roads and hiring climate change planners.

Palm Beach County joined a regional compact on climate change in 2010 with Miami-Dade, Broward and Monroe counties. In 2015, Palm Beach County commissioners hired a climate change coordinator, a position that pays $86,000 a year.

While local efforts have not received large sums of federal dollars, Trump's stance could have an effect if federal agencies don't play as active of a role on researching climate change, said Jason Liechty, environmental projects coordinator for Broward County.

"We stand to lose the technical assistance, the support, the help that the federal government provided," he said.

The only references to climate change on the White House is a pledge in Trump's "America First Energy Plan" to eliminate "harmful and unnecessary policies such as the Climate Action Plan and the Waters of the U.S. rule."

Abrams, one of two Republicans on the seven-member Palm Beach County Commission, said his constituents in Boca Raton are worried that rising seas will inundate expensive oceanfront properties.

"At the local level," he said, "I don't have the luxury of engaging in these lofty debates that they do in Washington — when I am knee deep in flooding in my coastal communities."

sswisher@sunsentinel.com, 561-243-6634 or @SkylerSwisher

Trump on climate change

President Donald Trump has often taken a combative tone against climate change, dismissing it as a "hoax" and a concept "created by and for the Chinese."

"The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive." (Twitter, Nov. 6, 2012)

"Ice storm rolls from Texas to Tennessee — I'm in Los Angeles and it's freezing. Global warming is a total, and very expensive, hoax!" (Twitter, Dec. 6, 2013)

"I am not a believer in man-made global warming. ... Obama thinks it's the No. 1 problem of the world today. I think it's very low on the list." (Hugh Heweitt radio show, Sept. 21, 2015)

"We're going to cancel the Paris Climate Agreement and stop all payments of U.S. tax dollars to U.N. global warming programs." (America First Energy Plan, May 26, 2016)

On whether humans cause climate change: "I think there is some connectivity. There is some, something. It depends on how much. It also depends on how much it's going to cost our companies." (New York Times interview, Nov. 23, 2016)

FL House Speaker Threatens Records Lawsuit Against VISIT TAMPA

How cool is that! Speaker Corcoran is holding bed tax funded tourist agencies accountable for waste, fraud and abuse.


Speaker Corcoran threatens to sue Visit Tampa Bay over financial records
Steve ContornoSteve Contorno, Times Staff Writer
Friday, February 3, 2017 7:44pm

TAMPA — Florida House Speaker Richard Corcoran on Friday threatened to subpoena and even sue Hillsborough County's tourism marketing firm if the organization doesn't turn over detailed financial information related to its operations.

Last month, Corcoran, R-Land O'Lakes, requested from 13 local tourist development councils their fiscal year 2016 revenue and expense reports. In addition to advertising expenses and economic development projects, the demands included a list of employees and their salaries and every expenditure on food and travel down to the penny, according to a copy of the letter sent to localities obtained by the Tampa Bay Times.

Of the 13 jurisdictions, Hillsborough County was the only one that did not fully comply with the request, Corcoran said.

Hillsborough County Administrator Mike Merrill provided Corcoran some details. The county, however, contracts out its $10.7 million tourism marketing budget to Visit Tampa Bay, a nonprofit organization that considers much of that information private.

And so far, Visit Tampa Bay has said it doesn't have to share anything else — putting the agency at odds with Corcoran and in a precarious political position weeks before the start of the 2017 legislative session.

Santiago Corrada, president and CEO of Visit Tampa Bay, said the letter wasn't sent to his organization and he was not responsible for the response. But he said he saw the information Hills­borough County provided and thought it was "very detailed."

"I'm pretty certain all 13 counties responded and all responses were similar," Corrada said.

Hillsborough's response didn't satisfy Corcoran.

"Obviously, he's aware of the letter," Corcoran said. "If he wants to play a game, 'It wasn't addressed to me personally and I'm not complying,' we'll see him in court.

"We have a right to those documents, and if they don't want to give them then we'll subpoena them and we'll get those documents."

In a letter dated Thursday, the chairman of the House Tourism and Gaming Control Subcommittee, Rep. Mike La Rosa, R-St. Cloud, gave Corrada until Wednesday to comply.

The inquiry into county tourism spending signals Corcoran is setting his sights beyond axing Visit Florida to its local counterparts. Corcoran has turned a critical eye to the state's tourism marketing arm, forcing Visit Florida to unearth details about its contract with the pop singer Pitbull, and this week he introduced language to eliminate the agency.

Since taking over as House speaker in November, Corcoran has also demanded extensive records from university foundations and county economic development councils in a well-publicized campaign that he says is intended to rein in government spending.

But executing a subpoena would mean exercising a legislative power rarely used in Tallahassee.

"I don't think government should spend money on tourism and marketing at all," Corcoran told the Times on Friday. "Does Hillsborough County have the No. 1 education system? Is it No. 1 in taxation? Is it No. 1 in having the best infrastructure?

"Fix all those things first and, guess what, if they're fixed, business and visitors will want to move to your county."

Hillsborough provided Corcoran's office with quarterly reports from Visit Tampa Bay that included itemized expenses by category. However, not included were the names of employees paid by the organization or who was reimbursed for travel.

Visit St. Pete/Clearwater, meanwhile, sent Corcoran names of employees and more detailed information on spending. Unlike Hillsborough, Visit St. Pete/Clearwater is a Pinellas County government department.

Still, in the face of threats to its budget, Visit St. Pete/Clearwater president and CEO David Downing stressed to Corcoran that tourism marketing helps draw visitors to Pinellas County at no cost to residents.

Across the state, counties pay for tourism marketing with a tourist development tax, also know as a bed tax, which is collected on each night's stay at hotels, motels, RV parks and the like, and not property or sales taxes. State law has strict rules for how bed taxes can be spent, and tourism marketing is one such allowance.

"Our model is simple: tourists pay for tourism promotion," Downing wrote Corcoran.

Visit Tampa Bay has drawn criticism in the past for what some consider a lack of transparency. Corrada said the organization keeps secret certain details to remain competitive as its tries to lure conferences, sporting events and other high-tourism events to the region.

Corrada made $277,000 in 2014, according to Visit Tampa Bay's most recent federal tax filings. Six other individuals in the organization made well over six figures.

But if Corcoran wants to go to battle against Visit Tampa Bay, he will find many defenders of Corrada in Tampa and Hillsborough, even among conservatives.

Corrada, recognizable by his feathered mane and wide smile, is affable and outgoing. Local officials trip over themselves to heap him with praise, and the agency is often credited with boosting tourism to a county that doesn't have the luxury of beaches or world renowned theme parks.

Hillsborough hotels were projected to surpass $30 million in bed tax collections last year for the first time, which would make the county the state's ninth high- impact tourism district.

"If they believe visitors will come because of who we are, we need to learn from the mistakes of other states that eliminated tourism marketing," Corrada said. "We have to be very, very careful."

Hillsborough County Commissioner Victor Crist strongly defended Visit Tampa Bay's efforts as "extremely effective in marketing this region."

But Crist added: "Any government agency that's expensing taxpayer dollars should be transparent."

Times/Herald Tallahassee bureau chief Steve Bousquet contributed to this report. Contact Steve Contorno at scontorno@tampabay.com or (813) 226-3433. Follow @scontorno.

.FAST FACTS

Revisiting Florida's tourism dollars

Since taking over as Florida House Speaker, Richard Corcoran has taken a hard stand on how the state spends tourism dollars. On Thursday, the House filed a bill that would abolish Visit Florida, a state agency. He has also said that he wants to take a closer look at local tourism agencies, such as Visit Tampa Bay. Here's a summary of the state and Tampa Bay boards that might be affected.

Visit Florida — A statewide agency that markets Florida to tourists but operates much like a private organization. It's governed by a 31-member board of directors of tourism experts that oversees a budget of $78 million. It has a staff of about 130 full- and part-time employees that work in Canada, Europe, Latin America and even China and India. The agency was criticized for trying to keep confidential its $1 million contract with entertainer Pitbull to promote Florida.

Visit Tampa Bay — A nonprofit organization that promotes Hills­borough County tourism and books events at the Tampa Convention Center. It considers itself a private agency (and receives some private funding), but the lion's share of its funding came from the $10.7 million it got in tourist development taxes collected by county hotels and other short-term accommodations. In 2015, its expenses were $11.5 million.

Visit St. Pete/Clearwater — The official marketing tourism arm for Pinellas County that is funded by 57 percent of the county's tourist bed taxes. Unlike Visit Tampa Bay, however, it's a public agency that reports to the Tourist Development Council, a board of elected officials and tourism executives, and ultimately the Pinellas County Commission. It employs more than 40 people and in 2015 had a budget of about $25 million.

Speaker Corcoran threatens to sue Visit Tampa Bay over financial records 02/03/17 [Last modified: Friday, February 3, 2017 7:43pm]

Friday, February 03, 2017

Three cheers for U.S. District Judge James Louis Robart of Seattle



A Georgetown University law graduate, appointed to the federal bench by President George W. Bush, Judge Robart issued a nationwide order banning President Trump's unconstitutional Muslim travel ban affecting residents of seven nations (none of which have Trump investments or business deals). Our Founders' vision in enacting Article III lifetime independence is once again proven wise, as federal judges across America have struck down President Trump's illegal orders.


US judge temporarily blocks Trump’s travel ban nationwide

Trump's immigration order blocked by Seattle judge

 
Play Video1:04
Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson said a federal judge in Seattle has granted a nationwide temporary restraining order blocking President Trump's recent action barring nationals from seven countries from entering the United States. (Reuters)
 
SEATTLE — A U.S. judge on Friday temporarily blocked President Donald Trump’s ban on travelers and immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries after Washington state and Minnesota urged a nationwide hold on the executive order that has launched legal battles across the country.
U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle ruled that the states had standing to challenge Trump’s order, which government lawyers disputed, and said they showed their case was likely to succeed.
“The state has met its burden in demonstrating immediate and irreparable injury,” Robart said.
Trump’s order last week sparked protests nationwide and confusion at airports as some travelers were detained. The White House has argued that it will make the country safer.
Washington became the first state to sue over the order that temporarily bans travel for people from Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen and suspends the U.S. refugee program.

What Trump's immigration ban misses about terrorist attacks in the U.S.

 
Play Video1:23
The seven nations affected by President Trump's executive action on immigration are not actually countries where terrorists who have carried out fatal attacks the United States came from. (Daron Taylor/The Washington Post)
State Attorney General Bob Ferguson said this week that the travel ban significantly harms residents and effectively mandates discrimination. Minnesota joined the suit two days later.
After the ruling, Ferguson said people from the affected countries can now apply for entry to the U.S.
“Judge Robart’s decision, effective immediately ... puts a halt to President Trump’s unconstitutional and unlawful executive order,” Ferguson said. “The law is a powerful thing — it has the ability to hold everybody accountable to it, and that includes the president of the United States.”
Gillian M. Christensen, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, said the agency doesn’t comment on pending litigation.
Federal attorneys had argued that Congress gave the president authority to make decisions on national security and immigrant entry.
The two states won a temporary restraining order while the court considers the lawsuit, which aims to permanently block Trump’s order. Court challenges have been filed nationwide from states and advocacy groups.
Up to 60,000 foreigners from the seven majority-Muslim countries had their visas canceled because of the executive order, the State Department said Friday.
That figure contradicts a statement from a Justice Department lawyer on the same day during a court hearing in Virginia about the ban. The lawyer in that case said about 100,000 visas had been revoked.
The State Department clarified that the higher figure includes diplomatic and other visas that were actually exempted from the travel ban, as well as expired visas.
Washington and Minnesota’s lawsuit says Trump campaigned on a promise to ban Muslims from coming to the U.S. and kept up that rhetoric while defending the travel ban. Lawyers pointed to dozens of speeches and statements Trump has made.
“The executive order effectively mandates that the states engage in discrimination based on national origin and/or religion, thereby rescinding the states’ historic protection of civil rights and religious freedom,” the complaint says.
Ferguson said the order is harming Washington residents, businesses and its education system. It will reduce tax revenue and impose significant costs on state agencies, as well as make it impossible for some state employees and students to travel, he said.
Washington-based businesses Amazon, Expedia and Microsoft support the state’s efforts to stop the order. They say it’s hurting their operations, too.
Lawyers for Washington state said another hearing was expected in the next few weeks.

Fifteenth Amendment ratification anniversary

Today marks the anniversary of the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment, which states:




In 1989, I helped persuade the Justice Department to sue Memphis, ending racist annexations that violated the Fifteenth Amendment. In 2005, I helped halt unconstitutional residential annexations by the City of St. Augustine, Florida.

We SHALL overcome.

Sen. Marco Antonio Rubio Supports Importing Sand For Florida Beaches: TC Palm

Does this sound a trifle weird? What Republican campaign contributor asked for this? Does "Little Marco," as President Trump dubbed him in debate, have a clue as to why he's doing this?













Rubio bill: Bahamian sand could be imported to Treasure Coast


 435 1LINKEDIN 3COMMENTMORE
U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Florida, on Thursday introduced a bill which would allow the purchase of foreign sand to replenish eroded beaches in the United States.
Locally, Rubio's bill, the SAND Act, could provide a solution for rapidly eroding Florida beaches and could help protect the Treasure Coast’s sand, which has been eyed by Miami-Dade County, where sand reserves are depleted.
U.S. Rep. Lois Frankel, D-West Palm Beach, a longtime advocate for Treasure Coast beaches, is to introduce the bill in the House.
Current federal policy bars the purchase of foreign sand unless economic or environmental factors make using domestic sand impossible. The most likely sand source for southeast Florida would be the Bahamas.
In a news release Thursday, Rubio said the ability to purchase foreign sand is “desperately” needed.
“This bipartisan bill will modernize an outdated law to give the Army Corps of Engineers greater flexibility in acquiring the sand Florida beaches so desperately need," he said. "Beach renourishment protects our infrastructure and environment, and provides a vital buffer against hurricanes and storms. Our beautiful shores also bring visitors from across the world, and these coastlines are economic drivers for the surrounding communities."
Treasure Coast elected officials — including commissioners from Indian River, St. Lucie and Martin counties — applauded Rubio’s efforts..
“On behalf of St. Lucie County, we appreciate the interest of Sen. Rubio in trying to address our sand-resource concerns through the introduction of this legislation," St. Lucie County Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, chairwoman of the St. Lucie County Erosion Control District, said in the news release. "To be provided the option to explore other offshore sand resources is greatly appreciated."