Tuesday, March 22, 2022

Bill putting strict limits on Soil and Water Conservation District boards passes final Senate panel. (Florida Politics)

Our corrupt State Senator TRAVIS HUTSON's venality and vengeance knows no logical limits. 

Those who do the bidding of HUTSON and other devious developers will live to regret it.

The FBI is watching.

God is not mocked.

Those who plunder our environment are in for a rude awakening when We, the People are heard and heeded. 

From Florida Politics: 

Bill putting strict limits on Soil and Water Conservation District boards passes final Senate panel

Daniel Figueroa IVFebruary 28, 20226min
The bill limits membership to farmers or employees of farms that earn more than $500K annually.

The idea seemed so ludicrous to GOP Sen. Jeff Brandes that he was exasperated as he pleaded with his Senate Committee on Appropriation colleagues to vote down SB 1078.

“I mean, we’re not serious with this bill. I can’t believe that,” he said. “Let’s not do this. This is not a good bill. This isn’t ready for primetime. This isn’t ready for spring training. I’m not sure this thing’s even ready for t-ball.”

But the bill, put forth by fellow Republican Sen. Travis Hutson, cleared its final Senate committee stop. Hutson’s bill puts strict limitations on membership eligibility for Florida’s Soil and Water Conservation District boards. The bill would require candidates for the volunteer public office to be agriculture producers working or retired after at least 15 years of work or employed by an agriculture producer.

An amendment added Monday further limits membership to producers who make at least $500,000 in a year. 

Buck Carpenter is an agriculture producer from Madison County. He told senators all of his income comes from agricultural exports. But under the bill, even he wouldn’t be eligible to serve on the board and wants more inclusivity.

“I am nowhere close to half-a-million in revenue,” he said. “Farmers, we buy everything at retail, sell everything wholesale and pay for freight both ways. So we have absolutely nothing to gain.”

The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) said it worked with Hutson to craft the bill into something digestible, but still found it too restrictive.

FDACS Agricultural Water Policy Director Chris Pettit said those boards work in partnership with FDACS to not just implement best practices and policies from the department, but to also implement education and outreach components and engage in agricultural projects that require engineering. He said it would be “wholly appropriate” for experts in fields like environmental science, education and engineering that might not be a farmer or employed by one to serve on a board.

“The ability to have specific expertise in engineering, science, education and outreach are vital,” Pettit said. “Generalists can go as far as they can go. I would call myself a generalist in many areas. There’s just benefits to having the ability to draw from a broad pool of experts.”

Hutson expressed his offense with some mocking his bill and suggesting that agricultural experts aren’t also experts at engineering, education and environmental science.

“Farmers are not stupid. They can understand this. They can resolve these issues. They’ve got staff there,” he said. “So farmers aren’t stupid and I don’t think people should start minimizing the farming community or people that work for farmers.”

Hutson’s bill almost called for the abolition of the district boards. He said he was told the boards in his area didn’t have enough representation from the agricultural community. But when he received pushback from other boards, he changed the bill to amend board membership. But board members said they don’t want the bill either.

Nicole Crosby is chair of the board in St. Johns County, part of Hutson’s district. She said a public records request to find out about alleged complaints yielded no results. She challenged the constitutionality of the bill’s restrictions and said it could be a slippery slope.

“We have a 14th Amendment that says you can’t put unreasonable restrictions on a candidate for public office. Residency, age, mental competency, those are reasonable restrictions. But restrictions that rule out perhaps 95% of Floridians from running for an office are unreasonable and unconstitutional. What’s next, major restrictions on who can run for House or Senate?”

The next step for SB 1078 is a vote on the Senate floor and possible adoption.

Daniel Figueroa IV

Bronx, NY —> St. Pete, Fla. Just your friendly, neighborhood journo junkie with a penchant for motorcycles and Star Wars. Daniel has spent the last decade covering Tampa Bay and Florida for the Ledger of Lakeland, Tampa Bay Times, and WMNF. You can reach Daniel Figueroa IV at danuscripts@gmail.com.

No comments: